There Is No Climate Crisis: History Shows the Earth has Seen Far Worse, even when CO2 was 30% less than at present.

Whenever high temperatures are reported in the US, or Europe, the news is hyper-inflated into wild theories of climate Apocalypse by the media, but weather-history suggests the panic is fabricated rather than justified. 

In fact, any hot weather event you can pick out in recent years is likely overshadowed by a much worse event decades or centuries before “man-made carbon pollution” was ever "on the radar". 

For example, the media is frantic over the current drought and “record temps” in Europe this summer, warning that it could become the “worst drought” in 500 years.  Of course, this claim opens the door to a question that climate scientists and propagandists don't want to answer:  What happened 500 years ago? 

A similar level of global warming hysteria was present during a heat wave in Europe in 2003, as well as in 2018. 

Mega-drought of 1540

The few climate scientists net yet bought and paid for by governments and the UN have had to point out that these droughts are nothing compared to the living hell that was the drought of 1540. 

This event is often termed a “mega-drought” because the region suffered historically hot temps while receiving almost no rain for a year.

Temperatures that year averaged 5°C to 7° C  above average temperatures in Europe at present.   In US terms, that means daily summer temps of around 104° F. 

Hundreds of historic accounts written at the time describe around half a million deaths (Europe's population was much smaller), along with vast wildfires and a winter in Italy that “felt like July.” 

Keep in mind carbon levels in Europe in 1540 were 30% LOWER than they are at present, yet, the region suffered perhaps the worst warming event in its recorded history. 

Today's climate data is based on records held by the NOAA and other institutions, and these sparse, inaccurate records only go back to 1880.

Vast land, sea and ice-covered areas of the world had no measurement stations. Using such data "as a starting point" is pure conjecture, has nothing to due with being science/fact-based

So, whenever you hear the mainstream media rant about record temperatures, they are using a tiny sliver of global weather history going back a little over a century. 

Any honest scientist in this field will tell you that the Earth's climate record is vast compared to the limited data used by global warming ideologues, and the majority of destructive weather crises have occurred well before man-made carbon emissions. 

It certainly wasn't carbon pollution from cars, farming and industry that caused the crisis in 1540.

Try doing any research on the 1540 event and you will be buried in a pile of mainstream articles that acknowledge the disaster.

But climate agitators are using that example to show why we must comply with carbon restrictions and climate authoritarianism in 2022. 

They say “Look at what happened to Europe in 1540.  You don't want that to happen again, do you?”

Of course, humanity had no say or control over the weather in 1540, just as we have no say or control over the weather today. 

There was no carbon based global warming back then, and there is no carbon based global warming now.

Scientists still have no idea what caused many of the warming events of the past including the crisis of 1540, so why should we have blind faith in their claims that carbon is the cause of warming in recent years? 

In fact, the NOAA and other climate research institutions still offer no concrete proof of a relationship between carbon emissions and rising temperatures. 

Their argument is they have excluded all other possible causes, leaving only carbon as the remainder. 

This is not science, this is haphazard guesswork.  

If there was ever a field that defies the logic, reason and analysis commonly associated with the scientific method, it is climate science. 

Set aside the fact billions of dollars in funding are paid out to climate scientists every year, but only to those scientists that operate from the assumption that climate change is caused by human beings. 

That is to say, there are numerous incentives for scientists to discount other causes for global warming.  They are not scientists, they are paid political activists. 

Luckily, temperatures are not that high.  NOAA's own data shows that the average temperature of the Earth has risen less than 1°C in the past century.  This is nothing, so why all the panic?

Plus the 1 C is based on a dubious starting point, as noted above.

Let's just say carbon controls are a powerful tool for micromanaging the population and justifying authoritarianism in the name of the “greater good.” 

If the public is convinced to accept false climate change narratives, then government would have the ability to control every aspect of daily life, from the amount of electricity we use, to the food we eat, to the businesses we can run, to the level of production and the size of the population. 

This is not fiction, this is reality, and it is happening much faster than many people realize, all in the name of saving the planet from a CO2 threat that doesn't exist.  

NEW ENGLAND

By the way, all of this, including rolling blackouts at ZUB-ZERO temperatures, and a lack of gas and oil for  space heating, applies to New England, if:

1) New York State keeps obstructing new gas pipelines from Pennsylvania to New England; THIS SHOULD BE LEGALLY FORBIDDEN AS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL INTERFERENCE OF INTER-STATE COMMERCE, and

2) The New England oil, gas and coal storage capacities near power plants are not increased by at least 100% to ensure RELIABLE ELECTRICAL SERVICE IN WINTER, WHICH WOULD BE ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT, IF UNCERTAIN, MOTHER-NATURE, WEATHER-DEPENDENT WIND AND SOLAR WERE FURTHER EXPANDED, AS THE US AIMS TO BLINDLY COPY THAT DISASTROUS EUROPEAN SCENARIO

These articles and image are provided for reference.