China coming on Mayflower to New England

Mayflower is a joint venture of Shell New Energies and EDP Renewables....and EDPR is owned by Energias de Portugal whose largest stock holder by far is China Three Gorges, aka, the government of Communist China.

https://www.edp.com/sites/default/files/portal.com/documents/rc_201...

Mass. picks lowest-price offshore wind option

Bruce Mohl Oct 30, 2019

THE BAKER ADMINISTRATION announced Mayflower Wind as the winner of the state’s second offshore wind farm procurement, praising a proposal that the company said offered the lowest price and the least onshore investment of its three major offerings.

Few details about the price or the onshore investment were revealed, but Mayflower said in its original bid that the price would be “the lowest cost offshore wind energy ever in the US.” Mayflower is a joint venture of Shell New Energies and EDP Renewables.

he choice of the lowest-cost option is controversial because it touches on a sensitive policy issue. Officials on the South Coast have been pressing the Baker administration to focus more on onshore investment so that the state could begin to supply more and more of the supply chain for wind farms springing up along the coast. Gov. Charlie Baker is eager to see an onshore wind farm industry develop, but he is wary of doing so at the cost of higher prices for power, which negatively affects customers and businesses across the state.

Mayflower laid out three options for a wind farm with a capacity of 804 megawatts. The first proposal, called “low cost energy,” offered the lowest price and some onshore investment. The second proposal, called “infrastructure and innovation,” offered a slightly higher price but promised more investment onshore. The third option, called “Massachusetts manufacturing,” offered the highest price but more onshore investment.

“Each of these proposals would provide the Commonwealth with the lowest price yet for US offshore wind,” Mayflower said in its bid. “Our projects are cost-effective and bring substantial economic development benefits, and the ability to enhance those benefits depending on the proposal selected.”

A press release issued by Mayflower on Wednesday said its low cost energy proposal will come in below the price of 8.4 cents a kilowatt hour, which was the winning bid on the state’s first offshore wind procurement. The press release said the proposal will also yield $3.7 billion in rate savings and lead to the creation of up to 10,000 offshore and onshore jobs in Massachusetts.

“Development of the Mayflower Wind project will contribute to the building of an offshore supply chain on the South Coast and across the Commonwealth, helping to launch a new, clean, safe, and innovative sector of our economy,” said John Hartnett, Mayflower’s president, in a statement.

Mayflower’s low price is another sign the offshore wind industry in the US is picking up steam. Many believed the price would go higher than the first procurement because a key federal investment tax credit is disappearing, but Mayflower officials said they are pursuing a strategy to tap the tax credit. They provided no details.

State officials declined to go into detail as to why the lowest price proposal was chosen over what appeared to be proposals with a low price with more onshore investment. But they said the winning proposal and its onshore economic benefits were scrutinized closely and was determined to have the best overall value. The actual choice of Mayflower was made by the state’s three major utilities, Eversource Energy, National Grid, and Unitil, while Baker administration officials participated in the evaluation process of the three companies’ proposals. [CORRECTION: This story has been changed, at the request of the Baker administration, to make clear that the administration did not directly select Mayflower Wind.]

“This was an extremely strong bid,” said Kathleen Theoharides, the governor’s secretary of energy and environmental affairs.

It appears Mayflower was far and away the easy choice. The state’s press release said the company offered a lower price and greater economic development opportunities than the other two bidders – Vineyard Wind, the company that won the first offshore wind procurement, and Bay State Energy, which lost for the second time.

The three utilities that ran the procurement process voted unanimously for the Mayflower proposal, the first time that has happened on the state’s clean energy procurements. With unanimous support from the utilities, the administration did not have to take a role in the actual selection. The utilities are now charged with negotiating power purchase contracts with Mayflower Wind, which are expected to go to the Department of Public Utilities for approval in January.

In a statement, Baker hailed the procurement. “Offshore wind is an important component of our administration’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide affordable energy options and we look forward to continuing to develop the Commonwealth’s emerging offshore wind industry in a sustainable manner that benefits all residents,” he said.

Continue reading here:

https://commonwealthmagazine.org/energy/baker-picks-lowest-price-of...

also:

https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2019/10/31/state-taps-mayflower-for...

RELATED:

Analysts have questioned China Three Gorges' likelihood of moving ahead with the bid because of the long delay to formally launch it and opposition from U.S. authorities to Chinese control of EDP’s sizeable wind energy business in the United States.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-edp-m-a-china/energias-de-portug...

************************************* 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views: 168

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Willem Post on October 31, 2019 at 10:17am

The Euros must be gnashing their teeth.

Let the behind the scenes China bashing and scare-mongering begin to wrest the project away from Mayflower, a Chinese company.

It would be much better for China to bid on NEW nuclear plants to replace existing plants.

The nuclear plants would be good for 60 to 80 years and run at a capacity factor of about 0.9 and produce electricity at about 5 c/kWh.

Mayflower offshore would be good for 20 to 25 years and run at a capacity factor of about 0.45 and produce electricity at about 8.4 c/kWh,

PLUS THAT WIND ELECTRICITY COULD NOT EVEN EXIST ON THE GRID WITHOUT THE OTHER GENERATORS PERFORMING THE PEAKING, FILLING IN AND BALANCING 24/7/365.

In year 25 and year 50 replacement units would be required; a lot of land fill all over the US northeast.

ALSO NEW ENGLAND HAD 5 TO 7 DAY WIND/SUN LULL PERIODS DURING WHICH ALMOST NO WIND AND SOLAR ELECTRICITY IS GENERATED.

THOSE LULL PERIODS DO OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.

THAT MEANS THE OTHER GENERATORS HAVE TO PERFORM ALMOST ALL OF THE GENERATING TO MEET DEMAND.

THE COST OF FUELING, STAFFING AND HAVING THESE UNITS IN GOOD REPAIR READY TO SERVE AT A MOMENT'S NOTICE, 24/7/365, IS CONVENIENTLY IGNORED BY THE RAH, RAH FOLKS.

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/cost-shifting-is-the-na...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/the-more-wind-and-solar...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/high-demand-and-low-win...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/analysis-of-a-6-day-lul...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/wind-and-solar-conditio...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/new-england-will-need-t...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/wind-and-solar-hype-ver...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/electricity-storage-to-...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/wind-plus-solar-plus-st...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/wind-and-solar-energy-l...

 

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service