UMaine Revisits Offshore Wind Approach - Follows Feds Telling Industry to Go Back to Square One

Bowling for subsidies continued. So long as there is an endless supply of ratepayers who have been hoodwinked by the media to believe wind power is a viable and necessary electricity source, there will be an endless supply of hucksters looking to take advantage. Why is nuclear power almost never mentioned by the media? Why are the true costs of wind power almost never mentioned by the media? Did a university ever see an opportunity for grant money it didn't like?

Note that the developments reported on in this PPH article follow the U.S. DOE's condemnation in February of current approaches to floating wind turbines. That condemnation stated ".....the current state of the art for Floating Offshore Wind Turbines (FOWT) is too massive and expensive for practical deployment.......FOWTs are currently designed to be large and heavy to replicate more familiar onshore wind turbine dynamics, maintain stability, and survive storms. However, this approach fundamentally limits how inexpensive FOWTs can ever become. For that, see:http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/u-s-doe-seemingly-scrap...

The Press Herald article today talks about larger turbines yet the DOE's remarks in February suggested current turbines are too big. Perhaps someone can reconcile these seemingly different directions.

10/31/19

By Tux TurkelStaff Writer

PPH - Competition makes UMaine think bigger about its offshore wind project

A pending $5 million federal energy grant to help the University of Maine design larger platforms for a coming generation of floating offshore wind farms reflects a new reality in the wind power industry: turbine sizes that seemed unimaginable only 10 years ago................The current challenge is to design turbine-support platforms that can be anchored in deep water 10-20 miles offshore, out of sight of land and in areas where winds are stronger and steadier.......................Now Equinor is building an 88-megawatt floating farm off Norway, Hywind Tampen, using 8-megawatt turbines. They will stand on a floating steel “spar buoys,” cylinders filled with ballast consisting of water and thousands of tons of iron ore...........................This industry scale up in turbine size is based on physics. Wind energy increases with the cube of the wind speed, meaning that doubling the wind speed creates eight times the energy. That’s why developers are looking at places, such as the Gulf of Maine, that are both near population centers and feature high, sustained winds that can be captured by massive turbines.....................................The proposed long-term contract would cost Central Maine Power customers an extra 73 cents per month on their bills. Supporters said it’s a small price to help kick start a new industry in Maine.................................. (Meanwhile, Social Security's 2020 1.6% cost of living adjustment amounts to a mere $23 a month for someone receiving the average retirement benefit of $1,460; but just keep telling us that 73 cents here and 73 cents there do not matter)

Read the entire article at:

https://www.pressherald.com/2019/10/31/competition-prompts-umaine-t...

EARLIER:

Oct 22, 2019 - UMaine to develop alternative floating wind in place of Monhegan planned two 6-MW turbine project

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/oct-22-2019-umaine-to-d...

Feb 5, 2019 - DOE to Floating Wind Turbine Technology: Go Back To Square One

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/u-s-doe-seemingly-scrap...

************************************* 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views: 143

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on October 31, 2019 at 11:46am

What of the costs not mentioned in the above shill piece?

(1) Transmission costs are much higher than those of other types of electricity, but they are not charged back to wind and solar in most studies.

(2) With increased long distance electricity transmission, there is a need for increased maintenance of transmission lines. If this is not performed adequately, fires are likely, especially in dry, windy areas.

(3) A huge investment in charging stations will be needed, if anyone other than the very wealthy are to use electric vehicles.

(4) Intermittency adds a very substantial layer of costs. 

(5) The cost of recycling wind turbines, solar panels, and batteries needs to be reflected in cost estimates. 

(6) Renewables don’t directly substitute for many of the devices/processes we have today. This could lead to a major step-down in how the economy operates and a much longer transition. 

See the full article including information backing up the above bullet points at the following weblink:

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/renewable-energys-inconvenient-truth

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service