This terrible industry rigs nearly everything

It is not freedom of speech when hundreds of my fact filled comments are being deleted from wind energy articles. It is not freedom of speech when my internet activity is being monitored and important information disappears from the internet.  

It is also not science or ethical when Scientific American a company affiliated with the textbook publishing (Nature Publishing Group NPG), deletes dozens of my comments with scientific facts for readers pertaining to the wind industry's fraudulent research.

Scientific American articles with my missing comments:                                                                                                                                                                                           3 Ways to Keep Bats Away from Wind Turbines

Are Wind Turbines Getting More Bird and Bat-Friendly?

Plight of the Condors

Solar Farms Threaten Birds

Besides the comments of industry shills a few residual comments like this one have been left behind................... "Jim, excellent comments and good material, continue your heroic efforts against overwhelming political coverups of the HORRENDOUS FAILURE OF WIND ENERGY. I'm more knowledgeable on the Energy Issue, for which Wind is probably the biggest waste of Energy Dollars in the history of human civilization. An incredibly stupid source of Energy. And the EIA is lying about numbers regarding Wind Energy, trying to make their dismal performance look better than it actually is."

The truth is that this terrible industry rigs nearly everything. For decades they have been hiring fake experts, and throwing money at organizations, media outlets and politicians. But the most insidious aspect of this turbine invasion is that this industry is knowingly selling a non-solution for society’s energy needs and marketing their nonsense with smoke up everybody’s a** about how these green monsters can magically fix climate.

Since 1985 this industry has not conducted a single scientifically sound turbine mortality study. About a year and a half ago in a response to one of my article comments I asked John M. Anderson, Senior Director of Siting Policy for the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) to produce just one honest wind turbine mortality study. He never answered me because he could not produce any.

If Mr. Anderson ever produces one I will show everyone how it was rigged with methodology to hide carcasses. If he or anyone else claims they are all scientific or honest I can point out multiple flaws and point out the methodology used to hide carcasses in every one of them. In other words they are not telling the truth.

It is also impossible to fairly mitigate turbine impacts when this industry is rigging their studies. Yet this fraud has been going on with every wind project. If an honest court case were ever presented this entire industry would topple like a house of cards because it was all built using their rigged research.

On a similar note, people across America are outraged that nuclear inspectors must wait 24 days before visiting any place in Iran that is suspected of being an Iranian nuclear site because this time frame allows Iran to rig everything before inspectors arrive. Well folks, why do you think search intervals with the wind industry's mortality studies extend out to as many as 90 days and employees are allowed to pick up bodies during studies? Like this bogus nuclear deal, it is being done so the evidence (like my comments) will disappear.

Not one person or any government agency should believe a single word coming from the mouths of this industry.