Reality Deniers , Climate Cultists, Sea Levels and Fossil Fuels

Climate alarmists/cultists actually deny reality. You could call them “Reality Deniers” which has a nice ring to it. Spread it around.

The Truth About Sea Levels and Fossil Fuels

H. Sterling Burnett
H. Sterling Burnett
May 6, 2021


Environmental activists, mainstream media outlets, and many scientists routinely claim governments must take drastic action to prevent rapidly rising seas. They claim unless humans are forced to stop using fossil fuels, low-lying islands and coastal areas will soon be swamped beneath the waves.

To back up their claims, they cite statements (pdf) from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) asserting it is “very likely” sea level rise has accelerated since the middle of the 20th century in response to warming caused by rising greenhouse gas emissions. The IPCC, however, bases its claim on computer model projections instead of measured, real-life data.

Data lend little support to the claim seas are rising at a historically unusual or increasingly rapid rate. Global sea levels have risen by approximately 400 feet since the beginning of the end of the most recent ice age (approximately 20,000 years ago). Historically, sea levels have fluctuated over hundreds of thousands of years, having nothing whatsoever to do with fossil fuel emissions.

Research shows most of the islands making up nations such as Tuvalu and the Maldives are gaining, not losing, landmass. A peer-reviewed study that examined 600 coral reef islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans reported approximately 40 percent of those islands remained stable and 40 percent grew. More evidence can be inferred from the fact that the populations on these island nations and the coastal United States are increasing instead of fleeing. Moreover, in those places, they’re putting up new, expensive buildings and associated infrastructure daily.

A 2019 report (pdf) by Craig Idso, David Legates, and the late S. Fred Singer confirms sea levels have not been rising at an unusual rate in recent years. After examining long-term data from tidal gauges and other sources, Idso, Legates, and Singer write, “the highest quality coastal tide gauges from around the world show no evidence of acceleration since the 1920s.”

The difference between data recorded by the global tidal gauge system and projections made by supposed climate authorities is because “[l]ike ice melting, sea-level rise is a research area that has recently come to be dominated by computer models,” the authors write. “Whereas researchers working with datasets built from long-term coastal tide gauges typically report a slow linear rate of sea-level rise, computer modelers assume a significant anthropogenic forcing and tune their models to find or predict an acceleration of the rate of rise.”

Human actions, such as the construction of barriers, channeling of rivers, conversion of coastal wetlands into densely populated metropolitan areas, and draining of coastal aquifers for human consumption (which causes land subsidence) have undoubtedly made some coastal regions and populations more vulnerable to rising seas. Nonetheless, there is little evidence increased greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to ocean rise.

In a 2017 Heartland Institute study, geophysicist Dennis Hedke analyzed data from 10 coastal cities with relatively long and reliable sea-level records. He found there was no correlation between changes in sea levels at these locations and rising carbon dioxide levels.

For some cities, the rate of sea level rise has remained virtually constant, neither increasing nor declining appreciably from the rates experienced before humans began adding substantial amounts of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Other cities, such as Ceuta, Spain, have experienced very little sea level rise over the past century, exhibiting almost a flat trend line well below the historic rate of global sea level rise of approximately seven inches per century. Other cities, such as Sitka, Alaska, have experienced falling sea levels. Still others, such as Atlantic City, New Jersey, have experienced a large, rapid increase in sea levels.

The point is different areas around the world are having different experiences with sea levels, with differences in the rate of sea level rise being largely the result of localized conditions, not global climate change.

Our knowledge of previous interglacial cycles indicates seas will continue rising unless and until the next ice age comes. Like the apocryphal King Canute knew, human efforts to try to stop the rising tides are bound to fail; nature, not humanity, rules the seas.

It makes sense to prepare for rising seas by hardening coastal areas, discouraging ill-advised coastal development, and making people living along coasts aware investments made there could be swallowed by rising water. Ending the use of fossil fuels and giving ever-larger governments increasing power over people’s lives will not stop the seas from rising; it will only make people poorer and less free.

Views: 175


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Robert Powers on May 9, 2021 at 8:14pm
Comment by Robert Powers on May 9, 2021 at 8:13pm

Sea level changes are NOT related to recent "man made" climate change!


Comment by Robert Powers on May 9, 2021 at 6:42pm

People need to be reminded, that the continental shelf was dry land thousands of years ago...the sea level has risen for eons.  Maine fishermen have dragged bottom and recovered man-made artifacts, antlers etc from the deeps of the continental shelf!  Of course, the Greens/global climate change people do not want to pay attention to the real facts!

Comment by Kenneth Capron on May 9, 2021 at 6:36pm

At the ENR Committee last week, they supported LD 1572 Resolve, To Analyze the Impact of Sea Level Rise. It has no actionable items in it. The plan as best as I can tell is to establish as fact, without evidence, that sea level is expected to rise 1.5 feet by 2050 and 3.9 feet by 2050. This was despite one expert who pointed out that SLR was only .8 feet for the last century. No one explained how we get from .8 to 3.9 feet. It just is, I guess.

I offered the viewpoint that since the bill does nothing, why was it necessary. Better yet, even if passed, this bill, any bill, will do nothing to change the predicted outcome. So are we planning to build some of the huge mechanical dikes and gates like Holland and other Scandinavian countries are doing. Will we close up Casco Bay every day as the tide comes in and open it back up as the tide lowers? What about "floating houses"?

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on May 9, 2021 at 4:33pm

Newt Gingrich: In My Mind “There Was No Question” all of the Close Battleground States Were Stolen in 2020 Election (VIDEO)

The tide truly is turning when Newt can go on FOX News and not be lectured for making such a bold and honest statement. Of course, Maria Bartiromo is not your average FOX News host.

Newt Gingrich: In My Mind "There Was No Question" all of the Close ...


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.”

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service