Latest Science Exposes Lies About Rising Sea Level

Latest Science Exposes Lies About Rising Sea Level

https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/latest-science-exposes...

By Vijay Jayaraj

.

A jet-setting celebrity or politician ceremoniously eases into hip-deep surf for a carefully choreographed photo op, while proclaiming, human-driven, sea-level rise will soon swallow an island nation.

.
The scientific truth is simple:

Sea levels are rising, but the rate of rise has not accelerated.

A new peer-reviewed study confirms what many other studies have already shown – the steady rise of oceans is a centuries-long process, not a runaway crisis, triggered by modern emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2).

SOME HISTORY

For the past 12,000 years, during our current warm epoch known as the Holocene, sea levels have risen and fallen dramatically.

.



.

For instance, during the 600-year Little Ice Age, which ended in the the 1850s, sea levels dropped quite significantly.

The natural warming, that began about 1690 got to a point, where loss of land-based ice in the summers of the 1800s began to exceed the winter gain.

As a result, the glaciers began to recede and shrink and sea levels rose.

By 1850, full-on glacial retreat was underway.

.

Thus, the current period of gradual sea-level increase began between 1800-1860.

That PRECEDED any significant human CO2emissions by many decades.

The U.S. Department of Energy’s 2025 critical review on CO2 and climate change confirms this historical perspective.

.

“There is no good, sufficient or convincing evidence, global sea level rise is accelerating –there is only hypothesis and speculation.

"Computation is not evidence and unless the results can be practically viewed and measured in the physical world, such results must not be presented as such,” notes Kip Hansen, researcher and former U.S. Coast Guard captain.

.

New Study Confirms No Crisis

While activists speak of “global sea-level rise,” the ocean’s surface does not behave like water in a bathtub. Regional currents, land movements (up/down/sideways), and local hydrology all influence relative sea level. .

This is why local tide gauge data is important. As Hansen warns, “Only actually measured, validated raw data can be trusted. … You have to understand exactly what’s been measured and how.”

.

In addition, local tide-gauge data cannot be extrapolated to represent global sea level. This is because the geographic coverage of suitable locations for gauges is often poor, with the majority concentrated in the Northern Hemisphere.

Latin America and Africa are severely under-represented in the global dataset.  

Hansen says, “The global tide gauge record is quantitatively problematic, but individual records can be shown as qualitative evidence for a lack of sea-level rise acceleration.”

.

A new 2025 study provides confirmation

Published in the Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, the study systematically dismantles the narrative of accelerating sea-level rise.

It analyzed empirically derived long-term rates from datasets of sufficient length – at least 60 years – and incorporated long-term tide signals from suitable locations.

The startling conclusion: Approximately 95% of monitoring locations show no statistically significant acceleration of sea-level rise.

It was found that the steady rate of sea-level rise – averaging around 1 to 2 millimeters per year globally – mirrors patterns observed over the past 150 years.

.

The study suggests, projections by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which often predicts rates as high as 3 to 4 millimeters per year by 2100, overestimate the annual rise by approximately 2 millimeters, at least 100%.

.

This discrepancy is not trivial.

It translates into billions of dollars in misguided infrastructure investments and adaptation policies, which assume a far worse scenario than what the data support.

Because we now know that local, non-climatic phenomena are a plausible cause of the accelerated sea level rise measured locally.

Rather than pursuing economically destructive initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on the basis of questionable projections and erroneous climate science, money and time should be invested in supporting coastal communities with accurate data for practical planning to adapt to local sea level rise.

Successful adaptation strategies have existed for centuries in regions prone to flooding and sea-level variations.

The Netherlands is an excellent example of how engineering solutions can protect 12 million coastal populations even living up to 6 meter below sea level, such as Rotterdam, with more than a million people.

.

Slowly rising sea levels are real but not a crisis.

What we have is a manageable, predictable phenomenon to which societies have adapted for centuries.

To inflate it into an existential threat is to mislead, misallocate, and ultimately harm the communities that policymakers claim to protect.

.


Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.

Views: 7

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2025   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service