Coal’s Importance For Solar Panel Manufacturing

Coal’s Importance For Solar Panel Manufacturing

Dr. Lars Schernikau



  1. Metallurgical-grade silicon making
  2. Carbon sources for silicon making: Coal, petcoke, hardwood
  3. Solar-grade silicon (SoG-Si) making and wafering
  4. Finalizing solar panel manufacturing
  5. Coal and China
  6. Summary


Coal is not the favorite “child” these days. Almost the entire western political world has sworn to send coal to its grave.

Not only have the United Nations and the IEA literally declared “war” on coal, but countless political, activist organizations and leading financial institutions have pledged, if it had to be in their power, to immediately stop the usage of coal.


The reason for all of this is of course this “terrible” chemical element called carbon (number 6 on the periodic table).

The same carbon is the 2nd most abundant element in the human body and it is a key building block for all life on Earth.

By the way, carbon is not only essential, because CO2 is plant food and plants grow best at 1.500 ppm of CO2 in the air (current atmospheric content is 420 ppm),

CO2 is also a greenhouse gas, contributing to keeping our Earth temperature livable and temperate.

The prize for keeping Earth livable has to go to water and water vapor, the most important and most abundant greenhouse gas.

We all understand, increased greenhouse gas concentrations will contribute to slight warming, though only a few of us have learnt – including I after studying it – there are so-called saturation levels to consider, which means that higher concentrations of any greenhouse gas have less and less impact on temperature changes (the warming impact logarithmically declines).


Today’s blog is about coal and solar

Why are coal and solar so closely interlinked?

Why is solar panel manufacturing impossible without coal?

I always thought coal is “only” important for electricity, contributing about 36% of global electricity generation, I always thought coal is “only” required to produce steel. 

Let us have a look at solar panel manufacturing, which is really about silicon production.

The vast majority of all energy required to make solar panels is consumed during silicon production, purification, and wafering.

Firstly, let’s talk about purity. 6 nines, 6N pure means 99.9999% purity level, 11N means 99.999999999% purity level, you get the point.


You may now have a first glimpse of the chemical and mechanical difficulty of making such a pure metal from a natural product.

In this blog post, you will see how important uninterrupted power supply is, especial for industrial processes such as silicon smelting.

Obviously, this power comes from coal in China, and cannot come from weather-dependent, unreliable, costly, grid-disturbing wind or solar. Let’s dig deeper.

Elemental silicon (Si) is not a naturally available element. Silicon (Si) is produced by chemically reducing mined, high-purity quartz (SiO2) using carbon (C) in submerged-arc furnaces.

Each arc furnace requires up to 45 MW of power, to provide electric heat for the silicon processes.

As the mix of quartz stone and carbon heats, the carbon reacts with the oxygen in the quartz and forms CO gas, this is called silicon smelting.

Similar to iron ore (Fe2O3) being reduced using coke from coking coal (C) to make iron (Fe).

All simplified

iron: 2Fe₂O₃ + 3C → 4Fe + 3CO₂

silicon: SiO₂ + C → Si + CO₂

Each ton of Si (28.09 g/mol) yields 1.57 tons of CO₂ (44 g/mol) ,assuming perfect efficiency, in this Si smelting process alone.


High purity quartz sand (HPQ) is the feedstock for metallurgical-grade silicon.

The starting quality of feedstock for solar panels and semi-conductors is 99.95% silicon oxide (SiO2), with less than 500 ppm of total impurities.

Such HPQ is scarce and needs to be mined, processed, and transported, before it is ready to be used for smelting (Chemical Research 2023 and Troszak).

The typical processing sequence for HPQ includes: 

  • (a) pre-treatment, which involves crushing, scrubbing, desliming, screening, and grinding; 
  • (b) physical separation methods, including radiometric sorting, dense media separation, gravity separation, magnetic–electric separation, and flotation; 
  • (c) chemical treatments, such as calcination-water quenching and leaching; and
  • (d) advanced treatments, encompassing chlorination, roasting and vacuum refining (Zhang et al 2023).


Estimates of the energy and CO2 footprint of silicon manufacturing diverge widely in the literature or “scientific community”.

Global silicon purification and solar panel manufacturing is dominated by China (Figure 1).

NOTE: If you are interested to learn more about the physical and chemical characteristics of coal, please read the author’s newly published Coal Handbook available at your favourite book store.


Figure 1: China’s share in global solar panel manufacturing and its process step.  Source: BloombergNEF, April 2024, 

Various sources of carbon are used for the silicon smelting process. These carbon sources are derived largely from coal, petcoke (a byproduct of oil refining) and hardwood.

Coal, to make coke, is the most important, but this coal must be of special quality, very low ash, high fixed carbon, with specific reactivity (tested using SINTEF tests), and of a specific size.

This coal is rather scarce globally, with Colombia playing an important role.

For more detail on silicon smelting, see Troszak’s 2019, Burning coal and trees to make solar panels.


The mining of such coal is not only expensive, because it is scarce and requires large overburden removal, but also the coal processing (washing) requires energy and “wastes” resources.

Once washed and ready, only a fraction of the coal consisting of specific sizing, usually 3-12 mm, can be used in the furnaces used for silicon smelting.

The finer material has to be sold at lower prices/kg.

Furthermore, to maintain the sizing, the coal is shipped in bulker-bags or sea-containers, so the sizing does not degrade with handling and transportation.


You can see why such special coal demands a large premium and a significant amount of energy for mining, processing/upgrading/sizing, and then of course transportation to the smelters (thanks also to Rob Boyd from New Zealand for his valuable input).


Shredded hardwood must be mixed into the silicon smelter “pot” to allow the reactive gasses to circulate, so that the liquid silicon that forms, can settle to the bottom for tapping, and to allow the resulting CO (and other gasses) to escape the smelter “charge” safely (Troszak 2019).

Wood chips provide a large surface area for the chemical reaction to take place more completely and at improved rates. 

Hardwood helps to maintain a porous charge, thereby promoting gentle and uniform – instead of violent – gas venting.

Wood chips help regulate smelting temperatures to keep the furnace burning smoothly on top, reducing conductivity, promoting deep electrode penetration, reducing dust, and help in preventing bridging, crusting, and agglomeration of the mix (Wartluft 1971).

Of course, aged hardwood trees are required to be burned to make wood chips.

Hardwood is biomass that is extracted from nature, but those trees, i.e. in the Brazilian Amazon, you may not be surprised, take about 50 years to grow.


The production of charcoal in a traditional manner in the forest Figure 2: The production of charcoal in a traditional manner in the forest

For solar panel manufacturing to be complete, more is required.

Metallurgical grade silicon (MG-Si) from the smelter, usually of 98% purity, does not meet the purity requirements of the solar industry, it must undergo two more energy-intensive processes before it can be made into solar cells and then into panels.


Firstly, the Siemens Process converts metallurgical grade silicon (MG-Si) from the smelter into polycrystalline silicon (called polysilicon) by using an extremely energy intensive process, a high-temperature vapor deposition process (Troszak 2019).

The purity requirement for solar grade silicon (SoG-Si) is currently 9-11N (99.999999999%), a factor of 10.000 to 100.000 more pure compared to the 5-6N purity required for solar PV a decade ago. Most existing PV panels have such lower purity.


In the Siemens process, silicon is crushed and mixed with hydrochlorous acid (HCl) to create Trichlorosilane gas (SiHCl3). This gas is heated and deposited onto very hot rods of polysilicon (1150 C) while the reaction chambers walls are cooled.

Each batch of polysilicon “rods” takes several days to grow, and a continuous, 24/7 supply of electricity to each reactor is essential to prevent a costly “run abort.” 

Polysilicon refineries depend on highly reliable conventional power grids, and usually have two incoming high-voltage supply feeds. (Sources Mariutti and Schernikau 2024, unpublished academic paper, Troszak 2019).


Secondly, the Czochralski Process turns the liquid silicon metal from the smelter and doping materials (gallium or phosphorous) into the silicon ingot, a large monocrystal, 20-30 cm diameter and 1-2 m long.

Next, the ingot is sawed into rectangular bricks, which are sliced into wafers using a diamond wire sawing process (Figures 3 and 4).

This process requires several days, and uninterrupted 24/7 power supply.

An ingot/wafer/cell plant can use more than 100 MWh of additional energy per ton of incoming polysilicon, which is about 6 times as much as the original smelting of the silicon from ore.


Estimates of the energy and CO2 footprint of silicon purification and wafering diverge widely in the academic literature, mainly due to two reasons.

On the one hand, there is no agreement on the estimated energy demand for these core processes. For example, solar grade silicon (SoG-Si) is the most energy-intensive step in the silicon purification process and should best be understood.

Yet, SoG-Si inventories report an electricity demand ranging from 50 - 110 MWh/ton, which appears quite low. 

On the other hand, secondary and pre-smelting processes are rarely included when considering the definition of an energy footprint, applicable to the average Chinese silicon industry.

Currently, reporting used by governments for decision making, tend to be based on best-in-class plants, like in Europe or North America, which is far removed from reality.


Once wafers are produced, a few more steps are required before we have a ready-made solar panel.

All of these steps require a significant amount of energy in addition to the raw materials required to build the factories and machines, the running of processes and operations, and the supplying of electricity and heat required to perform these processes.

  • Wafer sawing: Silicon “bricks” are sliced into thin wafers for later manufacturing of solar cells
  • Solar cell and module production: requiring aluminum, glass, copper, plastic, rare earths, acids, and over 400 chemicals
  • Mounting structure supply: requiring aluminum or steel frames, cement foundation, etc.
  • Transportation: everything needs to be transported to the point of use i.e. in the US or Germany consuming at least oil products 


I am not covering decommissioning and disposal of solar panels here.

But it will suffice to mention that the average operational lifespan of the newest utility scale solar panels, is a fraction of the 20-25 years marketed in the media, proving to be more like less than 15 years.

While older solar panels used to “live” longer, newer ones are optimized for the lowest raw materials and energy use, negatively impacting lifespan.

Libra et al 2023 details that after about 10 years, serious failures of 1st tier (bankable) PV panels occur at an increasing rate.

It is obvious that decommissioning and disposal, and certainly any recycling, require energy and infrastructures made out of raw materials.


Figure 4: Czochralski process whole ingot (left), and brick and chords after sawing (right), crown and tail (upper right)  Source: SVM from Troszak 2019

From this blog, you can now better see how important uninterrupted power and heat supply is especially for industrial processes, such as silicon smelting.

Obviously, this power comes from coal in China, and cannot come from wind or solar.

Figure 5 illustrates how China increased its power consumption more than 5 times in 20 years and how coal-fired power generation continues to grow with the economy.

The large wind and solar installations can be seen as additions to fossil rather than a transition away from fossil.

For comparison, I added lines to illustrate the approximate electricity consumption of the US and Germany respectively.


Figure 5: Chinese electricity generation by sources compared to US and Germany.  Source: Schernikau based on Ember, details here


Global electricity generation is dominated by thermal power.

Coal and gas alone account for about 60% (Figure 6).

We understand that the world, and especially China (Figure 7), continues to build large coal power plants to provide reliable uninterrupted power and domestic and industrial heat.

Wind and solar enthusiasts often underestimate the importance of inertia of rotational mass for the stability of our grids. 


Coal consumption hit another record in 2023; Global, 8.6 billion metric ton; China 4.6 BMT.

At the same time, China also led the global installation of new solar plants within China, in addition to selling its solar panels globally.

2023 and 2024 show another upswing of new coal power plant installations amounting to numbers surpassing 2018 levels (Figure 7).

World installed capacity for electricity generation is about 8,600,000 MW (including coal, gas, nuclear, hydro, wind, solar, etc.), of which coal is about 2,1 TW.

Thus, 25% of installed capacity provides for 36% for power generation.

Utilization and efficiency of coal plants will continue decreasing as more wind and solar is added to the grids. .


However, the installed coal capacity growth has to keep pace with the increasing requirements for uninterruptible power supplying process heating.


Figure 6: Global electricity generation by source.  Source: Schernikau based on Our World in Data and Global Electricity Review

Figure 7: China coal power capacity additions.  Source: BNEF, details here

Solar power and coal are closely interlinked.

Today, there is not a single solar panel that can be produced without coal (or even oil and gas).

The coal is required as a reducing agent for silicon making and as source for heat and electricity for the industrial process required to manufacture solar panels, not only in China.

As unpopular as it may be, the world requires coal, even for the so called “energy transition”.


That is why I support investment in, not divestment from, coal technologies to make the production and utilization of coal as efficient as possible, not only to minimize its environmental impact, but also to keep costs low, which supports economic development.

I hope this post helps you to understand the need for coal, and gives you a new insight into the “clean” world of solar power.

To learn more about how wind and solar work in our modern energy systems, please read our recent book The Unpopular Truth… about Electricity and the Future of Energy  available at your favorite book store.

Views: 15


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.”

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service