I have finally found some information on Maine wind power production - on the FERC website, which has quarterly reports on industrial wind farms: First Wind's Stetson I& II (capacity 82.5MW …Continue
Started this discussion. Last reply by Willem Post Dec 5, 2011.
Interested citizens: In the March 4, 2009 LURC hearing in Bangor, staff remarked that the proposed permit for Stetson II there is a clause that requires First Wind to submit to LURC a PROTOCOL FOR…Continue
Tags: II, -???, Stetson, at, testing
Started this discussion. Last reply by Joanne Moore Apr 8, 2010.
The University of Maine at Presque Isle is very proud of its windmill, and has been long on promises to share what has been learned from it. After monitering it for months, I see the website has a…Continue
Started this discussion. Last reply by Charlie Mar 13, 2010.
Harrison Roper has not received any gifts yet
On Friday 12/17/10 the third quarter FERC power output summary data on Stetson and Mars Hill were finally posted on the internet. Stetson produced approx. 15% of its installed capacity; Mars Hill produced approx. 32.75 of its installed capacity. The "approximate" is because the summary data are reported rounded to thousands of mWh.
Mars Hill sells all of its power output to the grid at a set price, $49/mWh. Stetson sells in a complex auction market, and prices have varied from time to time from zero to hundreds of dollars per mWh.
UMPI's turbine production averaged 1941.5 kWh per day 12/2 thru 12/11, which was 15.6% of installed capacity.
December is supposed to be a windy month.
Harry Roper - Houlton/Danforth
After a couple of attempts, the FERC website downloaded power production figures for October, November, and December of 2011 for Lincoln Lakes (Rollins), which FERC calls "Evergreen Wind Power III, LLC." I dont know why it didn't work the first time, I will post this information in a day or so.
H. Roper Houlton/Danforth
Posted on February 1, 2012 at 9:13pm
The FERC website seems to have been changed. I see no "Download" place, and I can't get the big list of producers to come up. Help!?
Harrisdson Roper Houlton/Dnforth
Posted on February 1, 2012 at 6:05pm
I have learned a bit more about the FERC website.
If you go to: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing-/eqr/data/spreadsheet.asp you get a webpage that has quarterly/monthly (?) data on power sales by all of the large power plants in the USA, for the past ten years or so. All large power producers are required to report this information to FERC, and it is public.
After selecting a producer (see below),…
ContinuePosted on January 24, 2012 at 5:33pm — 2 Comments
On a visit to the UMPI campus today (Jan. 22) the turbine was not moving at 1:00 PM. It was turning at apparant full speed at 4:30 when we left. Whether it was producing power or not is a mystery. The turbine website does not have any recent information on it at all; the latest was the report of 94,620 KWH produced as of December 29.
Harry Roper Houlton/Danforth
Posted on January 22, 2012 at 6:19pm
I just checked the UMPI website and the sad story continues. Still no real data reporting. When will they tell us of the real learning -- that their wind turbine demonstrates that Maine has a very substandard wind resource?
Source:
November 12, 2011
From the UMPI website. When will the University do its job and report on the undebelly of the slick wind hype machine and help save Maine and Mainers from this Enron-inspired scam? When the University research is not fairly assessed and broadcasted, it is essentially scandalous.
Time to declare this sole state experiment into onshore wind power the outright failure it is and pronounce all wind industry claims going forward guilty before proven innocent.
For university personnel to simply look the other way is very, very wrong.
It's now 50 days since the wind turbine produced power. Other than the note on the website advising "the turbine is down for repairs", nothing else is known. Turbines break down all the time in commercial wind complexes, but this goes largely unnoticed as others continue to turn. But over time, the percentage of potential power lost is the same, i.e., a 40 turbine complex will experience breakdowns 40 times as often as a single turbine.
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT (excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 http://pinetreewatchdog.org/2010/08/09/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/ From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" http://pinetreewatchdog.org/2010/08/11/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/ From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” http://pinetreewatchdog.org/2010/08/12/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
© 2012 Created by Eben Thurston.
Powered by
.