Lawmakers Vote to Keep 100-Megawatt Limit on Hydro, Protect Wind Power

By
Steve Robinson -

Advocates for wind and solar claim that these renewable sources will be able to replace power generated through fossil fuels, but they have yet to come up with an answer for how Mainers will get electricity at night or when the wind isn’t blowing.

May 3, 2023

The State Senate voted 19-14 Tuesday to kill a proposal that would have lifted the 100-megawatt cap on electricity generated from hydroelectric dams and other renewable sources.

The House had last week voted 75-67 against the bill, LD 622.

The move will protect an artificial monopoly held over Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) by the wind power and solar power industries while ensuring that Canadian hydroelectric power cannot compete in Maine’s energy market anytime soon.

Maine’s Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) law, passed in 1999, created a mechanism that requires a certain percentage of Maine’s electricity originate from sources the state designates as renewable. Under Maine’s current RPS, 80 percent of retail electricity must come from renewable resources by 2030 and 100 percent by 2050.

However, the law doesn’t take an “all of the above” approach to renewable energy.

Instead, lawmakers set rules to determine which sources of renewable energy will qualify as “renewable energy” for the purposes of RPS.

This includes a size limit of 100-megawatts for power generators to be classified as renewable.

In 2019, Maine lawmakers carved out an exemption to the 100-megawatt cap for solar power and wind power, a decision that provided enormous advantages to large corporations that manufacture, install, and manage large wind and solar installations.

The bill to remove the cap for all renewable power sources was introduced by Rep. Donald Ardell (R-Monticello).

“It’s so frustrating for me to see the Maine Legislature pick winners and losers in our energy choices, and it seems like they picked the absolute worst winners,” said Ardell.

Ardell noted that six Democrats joined Republicans to vote in favor of the proposal, but it wasn’t enough to save his bill. In the Senate, one Democrat crossed the aisle.

The Mills Administration opposed the bill during its public hearing.

Caroline Colan, a legislative liaison from the Governor’s Energy Office, said the governor opposed the bill because allowing cheap renewable energy to come into Maine from out-of-state would lower the value of “renewable energy certificates” and harm biomass facilities already operating in Maine.

RECs are tradable instruments that represent one megawatt-hour of power generated from prescribed renewable sources.

RECs are sold by renewable energy companies to other firms so those companies can comply with RPS or tout their green bonafides. Non-renewable energy companies will buy RECs in order to comply with energy composition laws, while trendy firms that want to be able to claim they’re “carbon neutral” or supportive of green energy. That demand creates a market for RECs which provides further financial incentive for solar and wind projects that might not be profitable without the government intervention.

“With only one hydroelectric facility greater than 100 MW located in Maine, the intention of this legislation is understood to enable the entry of existing large generators located outside the state to Maine’s RPS,” Colan said.

“Were large hydroelectric resources allowed to enter the market as qualifying Class I and Class ll resources, renewable energy certificate (REC) values would likely decline significantly and therefore substantially reduce the value that qualifying projects rely on to operate. In Maine that would likely mean having a significant negative impact on the state’s existing biomass facilities,” she said.

In 2022, just 12 percent of Maine’s total electricity consumption came from renewable resources, excluding nuclear and hydro.

According to ISO New England, the company that manages Maine’s electricity grid, 52 percent of Maine’s 2022 electricity came from natural gas, 26 percent came from nuclear power, 7 percent came from hydroelectric.

Within the 12 percent ISO New England defines as renewable, 4 percent was wind power, 3 percent was refuse, 2 percent came from wood, 3 percent came from solar, 0.41 percent was landfill gas, and 0.04 percent was methane.

Maine currently has 12 plants generating power from biomass or municipal waste. The most recent facilities opened in 2016, 2009, 2008, and 1992.

The 100-megawatt cap has long been a source of debate and disagreement between lawmakers and interest groups in Augusta.

Originally proposed as a way to stimulate demand for renewable energy, the cap has effectively given large wind turbine and solar panel companies a monopoly over renewable power generation at the expense of hydroelectric power operations.

Maine’s current renewable energy plan heavily favors wind and solar even despite the drawbacks associated with each.

The solar power industry has faced complaints in recent years that the supply chain for producing most panels includes forced labor in western China.

The recent Department of Transportation project that put thousands of panels up in Augusta, for example, relied on a sub-contractor that has been accused by the Biden administration of benefiting from forced labor in its supply chain.

The Mills administration has refused to comment on why the state selected a company with such a dubious track record to build solar panels for the public project.

The wind power industry, particularly the off-shore wind power industry, has also faced criticism that the projects are not as environmentally friendly or economically beneficial as proponents say.

An investigation by Bloomberg News last year found that the Biden Administration had ignored federal scientists’ private warnings that offshore wind power development on the east coast may harm endangered whale species.

The costs of building the sites coupled with the limited energy generation makes offshore wind some of the most expensive electricity on the market. Those costs are absorbed by all businesses and residents who buy electricity.

Both solar and wind power share another similar problem: intermittency.

That is, neither solar nor wind can provide electricity in a constant, predictable manner.

This has consequences for the entire power grid, which must adjust to accommodate sudden increases or decreases in power coming from solar and wind. Those accommodations come with increased on-off costs which are also passed along to the consumer.

To illustrate this, consider the following chart from ISO New England.

Continue reading here:

https://www.themainewire.com/2023/05/lawmakers-vote-to-keep-100-meg...

************************************* 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

Views: 71

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Richard McDonald/Saving Maine on May 4, 2023 at 2:03pm

The bottom line, Maine Democrats and Republicans could care less if Maine continues on it's path to rampant energy poverty and debilitating inflation caused by these policies - they don't give a damn.

Comment by Dan McKay on May 4, 2023 at 5:31am

Remove the REC requirements immediately, a program that forces Maine people to compete with every other New England state and New York state.

Offshore wind is stumbling. It was supposed to complement the demand for RECs.  It won't and REC prices are already starting to rise fast. 

Soon RECs will be immaterial as electricity suppliers will find they need to pay the alternative compliance payment (ACP), which is nothing but a penalty to ratepayers.

RECs are the worst scheme ever invented by your government, yet not one freakin bill was introduced during this legislative session to eliminate the REC program.

Not one bill was introduced this session to get out of RGGI, another scam with rapidly increasing costs to ratepayers.

Not one bill for reducing Efficiency Maine funding; As efficiency measures increase, the law of diminishing returns takes over, yet Efficiency Maine keeps raping the ratepayers of more money Kill the Beast before it kills the ratepayers. 

 

Comment by Willem Post on May 3, 2023 at 10:17pm

Politically protecting 25%-efficient, tree-burning power plants is the most short-sighted stance I have seen.

The energy equivalent of 3 of 4 trees is wasted, plus such plants have toxic flue gases, similar to coal.

Each cubic centimeter of flue gas contains tens of millions of sub-micron particles, that enter, via your lungs, into your bloodstream and other tissues, and STAY THERE, to eventually cause cancerous diseases.

This has been known since the 1960s.

Hydro plants with reservoirs produce the lowest-cost, cleanest, lowest CO2, STEADY, electricity, at about 6 c/kWh. 
Those plants last about 100 years or longer.

Maine should develop all suitable sites, as was done in China, which produces more hydropower than any country in the world, by far!!

We should admire China for NOT being short-sighted!!

More such short-sighted decisions in Maine and other states will eventually doom the US to a second-tier status

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service