Wind Data Manipulation, As Well as 2020 Election Fraud, Only to be Surpassed by Covid-19 Political Weaponization.

We all know how wind data is manipulated in an attempt to rationalize the feckless fraud.

How About  Election 2020 Data fraud?

Then How About the  Covid -19 Data we are led to believe as factual?

The Common Thread ? Deceiving and lying to  "We the People".

Please see this important video Webinar by Dr. Genevieve Briand of Johns Hopkins University.

A bit dry, but hang  with it, ( if you dare ) and  be more aggravated than ever.

How the narrative is manipulated by MSM. So is it a heart attack, Iatrogenic perhaps, or Covid-19? The Shadow Knows.

Never let a crisis go to waste?

Genevieve Briand is the Assistant Director for MS in Applied Economics programat John Hopkins University.

She has taught for the Applied Economics Program since summer, 2015, and currently teaches Microeconomic Theory, Statistics, and Econometrics. She has many years of experience teaching numerous and varied economics and statistics courses

This Webinar is from November 11, 2020.

Take a Look at the Real US Covid - 19 data, and  interpret it  with the good Dr. Briand. 300w, 768w, 1536w, 1600w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" />

Johns Hopkins analysis: C-19 not causing excess deaths. Cause of death substitution likely, as revealed in the data.

UPDATE: Within hours of the article discussed in this post beginning to pick up traction on social media, it was taken down from the Johns Hopkins Student News-Letter website with no explanation. It has now been made made available again on the website via a PDF, along with an Editor’s Note.

Please read the full Editorial HERE.

We applaud the newsletter editors for making the original article available and for publicly voicing their concerns, although it is unfair to imply it is leading to “misinformation.” It is one researcher’s analysis and attempt to interpret the findings and it deserves a close look and discussion that can inspire more analysis. This is a how good science should be carried out, with open discussion, criticism, dialogue, and re-examination. The dialogue and debate is part of the scientific process. The article has sparked an interest in the data and we look forward to seeing what others find.

The editors said that the article “has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.”

We disagree. The analysis has taken a step toward showing that the greatest impact of the pandemic has not been from the virus, but from the government response to the virus.

The editor said that Briand’s assertion that her analysis points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths did not take into account the “spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years,” and that the CDC says there have been 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19.

But that 300,000 number begs many questions. First, that’s 37,000 more than are being reported as COVID-19 deaths. CDC acknowledges the lockdowns and fear have prevented people from getting proper healthcare, have harmed the health of many due to loss of jobs, loss of homes, loneliness, isolation, fear. It is also known that in the first weeks, doctors were learning about COVID-19 symptoms and issues and how to properly address them. Tragically, it was thought that critically ill patients should be put on ventilators, but this turned out to be the wrong treatment. The fatality rate of those put on ventilators was around 90% (and HBOT has been showing about a 90% recovery rate in critically ill patients). There is still a major problem in the US regarding early treatment with the known effective treatments and protocols, leading to deaths that could have been avoided.

And there is still the major problem of diagnosis bias. PCR tests cannot be used for diagnosis, and yet patients show up at the ER, are tested for COVID-19, and if the test comes back positive, the patient is presumed to have COVID-19. There are generally no steps taken to see ensure an active SARS-COV-2 infection is causing the symptoms. If any other infection or illness or health issue is the cause of the patient’s symptoms, proper treatment may not be given, at times with tragic outcomes.

It is still not clear how many of those 300,000 excess deaths claimed by the CDC are a direct result of COVID-19 or the direct result of the public health response that placed avoiding the virus ahead of every other aspect of life.

The archived version is also available via the Wayback Machine:

Below is our original post:

An article in the Johns Hopkins News-Letter announced that Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, performed a critical analysis on the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths, using CDC data. She presented this data in a webinar, now available on Youtube. (If this is taken down, we have preserved a copy and will upload elsewhere).

Her findings are stunning, and yet they reflect what many have been saying ever since the CDC changed their guidance on death certificates for COVID-19 only, along with the misdiagnosis concerns stemming from how and when PCR testing is being used.

The article explains:

Interestingly, as depicted in the table below, the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19. 300w, 768w, 1536w, 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 994px) 100vw, 994px" />

The Johns Hopkins article explained that throughout Briand’s webinar, she “emphasized that although COVID-19 is a serious national and global problem, she also stressed that society should never lose focus of the bigger picture — death in general. The death of a loved one, from COVID-19 or from other causes, is always tragic.”

This analysis adds to the very strong evidence that the severe restrictive measures being justified by high “case” rates and high death counts must end. CDC’s unlawful changes to their guidance on death certificates must revert back to pre-Covid language, so that Covid is reported in the same manner as all other infections. And the use of PCR tests must be changed to reflect what is known about their utility in various situations so that false-positives, or “cold-positives”, as some are calling them because the tests may be detecting the presence of SARS-COV-2 but of the quantity or quality that cannot be cultured, meaning the person is not sick or contagious. For an excellent overview of the PCR tests and why they must be used very carefully, please see Dr. Lee’s petition to the FDA.

The censorship of every article, every group, every individual critical of the official narrative of the global response to SARS-COV-2/COVID-19 shows that a minor public health situation, which could have been handled calmly and with existing treatments, has been made into a weapon of fear to force an economic and social RESET upon the entire global population without our consent. As the time draws near for the experimental vaccines to be launched, the fear is being escalated and all critical voices silenced. But this is only waking up the masses.

Now is the time.

Stand for freedom.

Views: 349


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on December 23, 2020 at 5:19pm

Trump Says We’ll Fight Back Against Election Fraud in Fireside Chat

Comment by Kenneth Capron on December 3, 2020 at 9:44am

If there is one reason to re-elect LePage, it is this surrealistic Main Climate Plan. There is no one standing between reality and bankruptcy. Future generations are facing a financial sinkhole.

Comment by Kenneth Capron on December 2, 2020 at 7:54pm

This whole issue of secrets and deceptions has spread into many many fields of research and education. It is a greater threat to our civilization than an virus. I have complained to Jennings about all the lies that Troy Moon tells in explaining One Climate Future.

I mean, it is easy to explain our green future as one huge bankruptcy court decked out with solar panels and maybe even its own wind mill. After listening to the Maine Climate Council for months and months, and Po/SoPo One Climate Future for months, I have learned to vomit in advance of the meetings.

I don't know how the other folks on this site feel, and I could be wrong, but don't we need to stand up a small army in opposition to all the billions of dollars we are getting ready to borrow or tax for climate issues. In particular, I fart every time I hear the word Tesla. Need I go on.

Anyone willing to join in organizing a more realistic response to climate lies and deception?

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on December 2, 2020 at 5:24pm

Johns Hopkins University censors lecturer, responds with critique ignoring CDC data

‘Now everybody is sure Johns Hopkins is hiding something,’ commented former statistician William M. Briggs.
Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on November 30, 2020 at 12:18am

The identity of "The Kraken" revealed by Lt. General Michael Flynn

Lt. General Michael Flynn in his first interview following his pardon on November 25:

1. China is behind the election fraud

2. Trump's chances of being sworn in as president on a 1-10 scale is 10.

3. The "Kraken" released by Sidney Powell is the nickname of the 305th battalion, a military intelligence battalion.

4. This battalion has now seized servers which tabulated and altered votes in our election; the servers seized were located in Germany

5. When asked in the interview if the raid to seize the servers went without incident, he replied it was WITH incident and that he believed American troops were killed

6. He advised that the raid on the servers in Germany took place in a CIA facility

The interview is on video at the following weblinks:

Comment by Kenneth Capron on November 29, 2020 at 2:04pm

I figured as much. They manipulated a statistical aberration. When providing data for a death, a provider must include primary and secondary diagnoses. This has always been a flaw in reporting health stats. It can bury important data. And definitions of Primary can vary from country to country, state to state.

So it seems that CDC made up a data set of all references to COVID 19 just to boost their numbers. We need to find the emails that instructed data collectors to emphasize COVID as primary even when it was not.

Comment by Jim Wiegand on November 29, 2020 at 12:39pm

Gotta admit things are really Fu**ed up these days. By design, this virus could be weaponized against us forever.  Just a tweak every once in a while, leading to new lockdowns and vaccines.

I really don't see how national news can get many viewers because every night the news is contaminated with fraud.  Also do not believable for a second this guy is selling this many books unless Soros is buying them and giving them away. 


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.”

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service