By Jacob Posik
February 11, 2025
7 Comments
On her second day as Maine’s new public advocate – the official responsible for representing the interests of low-income ratepayers before Maine’s Public Utilities Commission – Heather Sanborn gave an interview to the Portland Press Herald which read like a full-throated defense of Maine’s controversial net energy billing (NEB) policy.
NEB is a system which provides participating ratepayers with credits to their electricity bill when they use private or shared renewable energy sources, like solar. Ratepayers who do not participate in NEB effectively foot the bill through higher rates charged to them by Central Maine Power and Versant to make up for the lost revenue. You can see this charge on your electricity bill, often referred to as a “public policy charge.”
On my Central Maine Power bill, for example, there’s a message at the top of the page which reads: “The average residential CMP Delivery amount includes about $15 per month in non-CMP costs to support Maine public policy initiatives including net energy billing subsidies, low-income assistance and energy efficiency.”
Regarding the state’s NEB policy, Sanborn told the Press Herald that Maine needs to “take the issue seriously,” but said she would not support “deleting words from statutes” because net energy billing has been law of the land for five years now and is even “part of the economy.”
“Deleting them is not good policy making,” Sanborn told the Press Herald.
It’s hard to grasp how Sanborn can effectively advocate for the interests of low-income ratepayers without supporting the wholesale elimination of this policy, especially when you consider the fact that her predecessor, Bill Harwood, opposed it.
In 2023, Harwood penned an op-ed in the Press Herald titled “Legislature must act now to save ratepayers from PUC solar program.” In that piece, Harwood estimated the state’s NEB policy “will soon cost ratepayers approximately $220 million per year for the next 20 years, or about $4 billion in total.”
Those costs to which Harwood referred are borne by non-participating ratepayers, including low-income Mainers and seniors on fixed incomes who simply can’t afford to install solar panels on their property or cannot participate in a community solar program.
Sanborn served in the Maine Legislature when the state’s NEB policy was passed in 2019 and voted in favor of the bill. When asked during her confirmation hearing whether she regretted that decision, Sanborn seemed to indicate she understood how NEB impacts the most disadvantaged Mainers.
“I can’t assure you that I, in the benefit of hindsight — that was five years ago, and technology has advanced, the costs of things have changed, we had COVID in between, I don’t know. And I don’t think it’s productive to sort of Monday morning quarterback things that happened five years ago,” she said.
“I do think, though, that there are lessons to be learned that we can carry forward,” Sanborn added: “and can use (these) to make sure that the lens that I view things through going forward is informed by what some of the expensive elements of the 2019 policy ended up being.”
Despite seemingly learning lessons from the mistakes of this policy, Sanborn told the Press Herald her office will testify neither for nor against a pair of bills that seek to repeal the program.......................
Article continues at https://www.themainewire.com/2025/02/who-does-public-advocate-heath...
*************************************
Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Comment
Maine folks are smart
They do not need a public advocate
She has impeccable delivery of word salads.
"Public Policy Charge" = G.R. A. F. T.
How Do Mainers Put UP With This Total Fraud?
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine