When criminals, corrupt government agencies and sociopaths are in charge of wind industry research-Part 1

When criminals, corrupt government agencies and sociopaths are in charge of wind industry research, they hide important scientific facts like this information below. Instead of seeking the truth, these demented minds learn to rig future research, so their profits won't dry up. In America these demented minds have rigged every wind industry mortality study since 1985. These demented minds also exist in both major political parties so it is wise to ignore all their grandstanding finger pointing because most of it is for show.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Today I was able to find just my second wind industry mortality study ever, that did not rig data collection methodologies and actually searched for the truth. This study and results have been hidden from the public. The ramifications from this study are huge, especially because of the nocturnal turbine mortality reported to migratory birds .................... In a study conducted in the Netherlands during the period 1984-1991, at a small 5.4 MW wind farm consisting of 18 300 kW turbines, "researchers observed a nocturnal collision rate of 68 birds in one week. Mortality rates may have been even higher due to uncounted birds that may have collided with a turbine, flown away and died later. Illumination of the turbines was not recommended: in conditions of "poor visibility...the illumination may even attract birds, which may increase the risk of collision."
Winkelman, J.E. 1992b. The impact of the Sep wind park near Oosterbierum (Fr.), the Netherlands, on birds,
2: nocturnal collision risks. DLO-Instituut voor Bos- en Natuuronderzoek. RIN-rapport 92/3. 4 volumes. (In Dutch;
English summary.) "Based on nocturnal observations with a thermal image intensifier in the Oosterbierum wind park in autumn 1988, an estimated 170 birds collided with 18 300 kW turbines during seven consecutive nights, or 0.051 dead birds/h/100 m front. This was equivalent to 2.5% of all birds passing at rotor height (20-50 m). In both the Oosterbierum and Urk studies, most bird victims were found after nights with both poor flight conditions and visibility.
In the Oosterbierum wind park, only a few birds were seen very close to a rotor during daylight. Of these, one (14%) was hit and killed. During the night, 20% of all birds crossing a rotor were killed. It was noteworthy that not all observed collisions were fatal, and that some "collisions" were caused by the wake behind, the rotor. In the latter cases, birds that did not contact the rotor were sometimes swept down by the wake, and injured or killed as a result.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              This turbine "wake" reported in Europe 30 years ago is also known to kill bats.
"It took one year to analyze the thermal imaging recordings obtained on 17 nights. Automated techniques
for video review were investigated in the Netherlands several years ago. At that time (1992) there did not seem to be any practical automated method for automated video review. New technology for video surveillance might now allow automated detection of birds."                

  After reading this hidden information from Europe, ....................   Let us always remember this publicized cover story for all the hundreds of migratory birds that were at killed the Laurel Mountain wind farm. All theses birds involved in this nocturnal mass fatality event,  supposedly flew into a substation building with a light left on .................... http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/nearly-500-birds-found-de...


Between Oct. 3 and Oct. 18, searchers found 484 carcasses, which were analyzed by biologists. Blackpoll warblers made up 65 percent, and ovenbirds, 7.5 percent. Twenty-eight other species were found, including thrushes, cuckoos and one green heron. Nine birds were listed as unknown.

The American Bird Conservancy said this was the third such incident in West Virginia, and it suggested that the solution was to turn off the lights. In fact, that is what technicians at the site did after discovering the dead birds. ( Pay attention Lake Erie litigants, because ABC, just like Audubon has,  will take you right down the garden path)

“This is the largest bird kill at a U.S. wind facility that I’m aware of,”’ Kelly Fuller, the wind campaign coordinator at the conservancy, said in an e-mail. She emphasized that the wind turbines themselves were not involved.

        "A wildlife biologist based in Topsham, Me., with the consulting service Stantec reported that his firm’s field inspectors had found 314 dead birds near the wind farm during an inspection on Oct. 3. “Carcasses appeared very fresh, with mortality likely occurring on the previous one to three nights,” the report said. No dead birds were found near the wind machines themselves."                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Had the New York Times been honest or actually investigated, they could have reminded readers that recently Stantec's wind industry research has come under great suspicion after reporting impossible results for years that defy the Laws of Motion and Gravity. They could have mentioned that even Jim Wiegand has proclaimed this frequently used company, the North American Kings of bogus and non scientific wind turbine mortality research because of their absurd results. 

Views: 295


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Jim Wiegand on March 24, 2018 at 8:11pm

- Part 2 is even better and it will post tomorrow.

Comment by Jim Wiegand on March 24, 2018 at 2:02pm

Have more very good info coming soon about the wind mafia, the people you refer to as the wind lobby.

Comment by arthur qwenk on March 24, 2018 at 1:27pm

All wind research in Maine has been conducted by the wind lobby.

What a farce!


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."


© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service