Rep. Reagan Paul: Maine’s 67% Renewable Energy Claim is a Scam—And You’re Paying the Price

February 18, 2025Updated:February 18, 202519 Comments

Maine politicians love to brag that 67 percent of our electricity comes from renewable sources. Sounds impressive, right? It’s a lie—one designed to mislead hardworking Mainers into accepting skyrocketing energy costs while wealthy developers and politicians cash in. This isn’t about clean energy or energy independence. It’s about forcing you to pay more while they rake in the profits.

The Renewable Energy Lie

The 67 percent figure only counts electricity generated in Maine, not the power Mainers actually use. What else can we generate when we tear down nuclear and hydro? And here’s the kicker: much of our so-called “renewable” energy is exported to other states, while we rely on natural gas, hydro imports from Canada, and even oil to keep the lights on. The ISO New England (ISO-NE) grid—where our real power comes from—shows a very different picture, with natural gas making up over 50 percent of the region’s electricity. And wind and solar? They don’t work when we need them. Wind turbines in Maine only generate power about 30 percent of the time, and solar? A pathetic 15 percent. When the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing, we’re still dependent on fossil fuels. But they don’t want you to know that. Wind and solar never register very high in ISO-NE on any given day. What that means is that you pay the price to generate expensive renewables for climate virtue signaling, while what you actually use is generated by cheaper forms of generation.

Your Electric Bills Are Going Up—Because of This Scam

Maine’s radical renewable mandates force you to buy expensive, unreliable energy while rewarding wealthy developers, foreign corporations, and the political class pushing this agenda. Wind and solar can’t survive without massive government subsidies—subsidies paid for by you. And offshore wind, the next big con, is expected to double or even triple electricity costs. Now, Heather Sanborn, Maine’s new Public Advocate, is working to raise your rates even higher. Instead of advocating for you, she’s testifying in support of time-of-use (TOU) pricing—a scheme designed to punish you for using electricity when you actually need it.

The Grid Is Becoming Less Reliable

Maine is pushing out stable, affordable energy sources like natural gas and nuclear in favor of intermittent wind and solar. What happens when supply gets tight? Higher prices, rolling blackouts, and a grid that can’t keep up. We already rely on imports to meet demand—what happens when those sources run dry?

Now They Want to Control When You Use Electricity

As if higher electric rates weren’t enough, Maine Democrats are introducing time-of-use (TOU) pricing—a scheme designed to punish you for using electricity when you actually need it. This means higher rates during peak hours, like when you cook dinner or heat your home, forcing you to change your habits or get gouged. It’s not about efficiency—it’s about controlling your behavior while they cash in.

Maine Has Spent Billions—and Produces Less Energy Than Ever

Here’s the ultimate proof that Maine’s renewable energy agenda is a complete failure: according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Maine is producing 30% less electricity today than it did decades ago, even though we’ve spent $3 billion on renewable energy projects since 2019. That’s right—after billions of your tax dollars and higher electricity bills, we’re generating less power than before. This isn’t progress. It’s a deliberate effort to make electricity more expensive while giving sweetheart deals to politically connected renewable energy companies.

The Truth About Janet Mills’ Renewable Energy Jobs Lie

Gov. Janet Mills (D) and her allies claim that Maine’s green energy push is creating 15,000 jobs. But that’s just another fabrication. These so-called “green jobs” include temporary construction work and positions in industries that barely exist. As a matter of fact, in a 2024 independent study that Maine taxpayers paid $35,000 for, “clean energy workers” can include carpenters, roofers, electricians, office clerks, and cost estimators, among other professions, including CMP and Versant workers. Meanwhile, Mainers are being forced to pay some of the highest electricity rates in the nation, all to prop up a renewable energy fantasy that benefits out-of-state corporations more than local workers.

The Bottom Line: Mainers Deserve Real Energy Solutions

The “67 percent renewable” claim is nothing more than political propaganda, designed to make you believe Maine is leading the way in clean energy while you foot the bill for their reckless policies. If they really cared about affordable, reliable energy, they’d be investing in nuclear, natural gas, and hydropower—not forcing us to rely on expensive, unreliable wind and solar and introducing behavior modification policies like TOU pricing. Mainers deserve better than skyrocketing electric bills and empty promises. It’s time for policies that prioritize affordability and reliability over political games. Demand real energy solutions that work—for you, not for their wallets.

Rep. Reagan L. Paul is a Republican of Winterport who represents House District 37. A graduate of Liberty University, she sits on the Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee.

https://www.themainewire.com/2025/02/maines-67-renewable-energy-cla...

************************************* 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

_________________________________________________________________________________

Vineyard Offshore cuts 50 jobs

By Jennette Barnes
Published February 18, 2025 at 6:43 PM EST

EXCERPTS

CAI has learned that the offshore wind developer Vineyard Offshore is eliminating 50 positions, some of them through layoffs.

A company spokesperson confirmed today that Vineyard Offshore has laid off employees and contractors and cut unfilled positions to reach a total of 50 job cuts in the United States and Europe.

“In an effort to position our projects for sustainable long-term success we have made the difficult decision to reduce our current team size in light of recent market uncertainties,” the spokesperson said in an email. “We look forward to continuing to advance these transformative American energy projects in the years ahead.”

It’s unclear how many of the layoffs are in Massachusetts; the company has offices in New Bedford; Boston; Uniondale, New York, on Long Island; and Eureka, California.....................

...........................At Vineyard Offshore, some U.S. employees were reassigned to projects outside the country, the spokesperson said. Vineyard Offshore is an affiliate of Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, a renewable-energy investment company based in Denmark.

The move follows President Trump’s executive order, on his first day in office Jan. 20, halting permitting for offshore wind.

Before the election, Vineyard Offshore bid on contracts to sell power from its proposed new wind farm, Vineyard Wind 2, south of Nantucket. Massachusetts utilities committed to buy up to 800 megawatts, with the hope that Connecticut would buy the remaining 400 megawatts.

But Connecticut held off until after the election. Then, facing Trump’s vow to stop offshore wind, Connecticut opted for solar and energy-storage projects instead.

Without a buyer for those 400 megawatts, Vineyard Offshore said it would not be able to build Vineyard Wind 2 right away.

************************************* 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

Views: 31

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Penny Gray on February 19, 2025 at 5:53pm

Good to know there's at least one honest EUT member in Maine.  She must have a lot of her fellow committee members squirming.  This scam should have been exposed and shut down decades ago.

Comment by Dan McKay on February 19, 2025 at 4:50pm

Before the democrat socialist takeover, retail electricity supply prices were just a touch above generation costs. In 2013, generation costs were between 6.75 cents and 7.23 cents and retail prices were 6.81 cents and 9.56 cents per kilowatt hour. A reasonable markup.

In 2023, generation costs, 4.80 cents to 5.29 cents. Retail prices, 10.83 cents to 17.74 cents!!

Government public policy has ruined everything. NEB, Long Term Contracts,RECs, Efficiency Maine, RGGI,Beneficial Electrification, GEO, OPA, EUT, PUC, A slew of envirofreaks, a pack of feral dogs aka, solar and wind developers, a numnut media and misled youths have all ganged up to destroy our best in the world energy market, but, times, they are changing. The stupid idea that wind and solar can replace energy dense resources is being exposed. 

There will be Hell to pay if the corrupt democrats of the EUT Committee try to shove Ms. Paul out or try to keep her quiet. 

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2025   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service