University of Maine System to fully divest from fossil fuel by 2030

Maine Public | By Robbie Feinberg
Published April 29, 2022 at 4:47 PM EDT

The University of Maine System is planning to fully divest from fossil fuels by 2030 — starting with the elimination of all direct fossil fuel holdings by the end of May.

On Thursday, the investment committee for the system's board of trustees approved two steps that it framed as major milestones in its commitment to address climate change. The first is a short-term change: to divest from all direct fossil fuel investments by May 31, and make no such investments moving forward.

But that still leaves open other funds held by the system, such as mutual funds and commingled funds, that may have some limited exposure to fossil fuels. The system has set a goal of divesting from those accounts by 2030.

"We are again at the forefront as we adopt divestment actions and goals," said Kelly Martin, the chair of the Board of Trustee's investment committee. "Our effort is to continue to demonstrate our strong commitment to addressing climate change in portfolio objectives."

The new policy defines fossil fuels as companies in the Carbon Underground 200 list: the 100 largest public coal companies in the world, and the 100 largest public oil and gas reserve companies.

The system estimates that about 1.9% of its assets, or $15.5 million, is exposed to fossil fuels. About $400,000 is invested in direct holdings, which would be divested by next month.

The university system's board already voted in 2015 to divest from coal, and two years later, it announced a new policy of considering environmental, social and governance factors in investment decisions.

However, faculty members and student groups have repeatedly urged the system at public meetings and rallies to move even further, saying that rapid action is needed to fight climate change.

"This is a great commitment and a great goal," said Charlie Cooper, a University of Maine sophomore and president of the group Divest UMS.

Cooper said that the system's latest action is a significant step forward, particularly its short-term commitment to end direct fossil fuel holdings, which has been one of his group's major priorities. As for the more long-term goal, Cooper said students will work to hold the university accountable in the years ahead.

"There's a chance for it to get lost among things," Cooper said. "As administrations change, and maybe new trustees are appointed. So it's definitely going to be a continued goal of Divest UMS to hold them accountable to this. But I think a long-term goal of 2030 is pretty reasonable for something like this."

The sustained pressure from students had an effect on at least one of the system's trustees, Roger Katz, who urged the board's investment committee on Thursday to divest even faster, for the benefit of future generations.

"I'm not going to be able to justify to them a board position which says, 'Oh, we're all in favor of divestment. And we'll get around to it sometime in the next eight years.' That's too long a horizon, it seems to me," Katz said.

But other leaders were more cautious and pointed out that divestment can be a complicated process requiring careful consideration. Trustee David MacMahon said that while that he personally is trying his best to address climate change, from composting to driving a hybrid vehicle, the board must balance divestment with ensuring a solid financial return.

"The balance is the fiduciary obligation we have to the beneficiaries of our pension plan, to the beneficiaries of the stabilization fund, the beneficiaries of income from endowments, student grants, loans, whatever else there is. So there is this balancing act," he said.

Several colleges and universities have already divested from fossil fuels, including Maine's Unity College, which acted a decade ago. And Tom Sanzillo, with the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, said a recent study from the investment advisor BlackRock found that funds that had divested still produced solid returns.

"None lost money," he said. "They either gained or were neutral, in effect."

The new policy does allow for the system to have "de minimis" - or very limited - exposure to fossil fuels. Chair Kelly Martin argued that is needed for now, as the system shifts its commingled funds in the years ahead.

"The world is evolving to climate change, and trying to help the planet. It's not there. So we have that glidepath, and in the meantime, you have to have that de minimis amount, because you can't just turn the switch on and off," she said.

The new policy requires that the system continually monitor any funds with fossil fuel exposure, and to consider climate goals when selecting investment managers.

https://www.mainepublic.org/environment-and-outdoors/2022-04-29/uma...

UMS Board Of Trustees:

https://www.maine.edu/board-of-trustees/board-membership/

************************************* 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views: 80

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Robert Feller on May 2, 2022 at 10:31pm

You cannot fix stupid even with multiple Ph.D's and all the other university faculty, stupid is not fixable and these people epitomize the word stupid.  The next generation of useful idiots to graduate will symbolize the end of conventional wisdom and thought.

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2022   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service