Electrical energy produced by the wind.

It sounds magical. It sounds free. It sounds ‘green’.

For the past eight months, I have been reading reams of information about industrial wind and its impacts, both positive and negative. In order for Governor Baldacci to achieve his goal of 2,700 megawatts of land-based wind power by 2020, up to 360 miles of Maine’s pristine mountaintops will have to be developed. Three hundred and sixty miles! That is longer than the distance from the crown of Maine to Kittery in the far south. A series of projects with such huge implications for the state of Maine surely warranted looking into.

So… I read, and read, and read. And the facts opened my eyes. The negative impacts of mountaintop industrial wind—the ones we never hear about or think of-- are enormous; impacts to our ecosystems, our hydrology, our wildlife, our economy, and our citizens. There is much about this misguided plan to worry Mainers. In very simple terms, it does not work. It isn’t financially feasible, and is only attractive (and yes, possible) through massive tax-payer subsidies. The power produced will be more expensive, by far, than that of other energy sources. It is not needed—Maine already produces more power than we use. The footprint is extensive, and thousands upon thousands of acres of carbon sequestering trees and vegetation will be removed from the slopes and summits of our mountains. As well, hundreds of miles of new high-tension transmission corridors will need to be built through our state to accommodate this new source of power; power which will not be kept in the state of Maine. Vital wildlife habitat will be fragmented and destroyed. Animals and humans alike can be affected by the high, low and ultra-low frequency noise produced by the turbines, and many will be affected by shadow flicker, as well. No, the meager positives do not come close to balancing against the immense negative impacts.

And yet, I believe wind power has a place in Maine. I am not a scientist, nor an economist, but I envision some solutions to the current wind puzzle. The proposed development of Highland Plantation’s five mountains is said to have a price tag far in excess of 200 million dollars. Two hundred million dollars, a large portion of it coming from our pockets, will be spent on one single industrial wind development; a development which will surely lessen the quality of life for many, and which will do irreparable damage to mountains which are in the direct view-shed of the world-renowned Bigelow Preserve and the Appalachian Trail.

The common sense side of me asks questions. Why not invest that same money in individual or neighborhood-based wind mills? Windmills which are small and have little, if any, impact on our environment or on the quality of life for the animals and citizens in its vicinity? With American ingenuity, we could certainly build the facilities to manufacture these in large numbers, and we have a sizable segment of our population anxious to find good jobs. These individual power plants could result in thousands of homes being removed from the grid. Citizens’ electric bills would be lower or even non-existent, and if more power was produced than the homeowners used, it could be sold back to the public utility companies. For example (and I’ll try to use conservative numbers): If one home-sized model cost $20,000.00, then 10,000 individual windmills could be established state-wide for the same amount of money as the Highland industrial wind project will incur. Think of the jobs created; from manufacturing, to set-up, to electrical and maintenance! Think of the money saved on power bills! When you think of home-sized windmills, the power does seem free, and much, much ‘greener’.

Of course, all is not as simple as it seems, or as it should be. Utility companies, developers and industrial turbine manufacturers have a lot of power, influence and money. Such a common-sense plan could spell financial disaster for them, and so they will fight it tooth and nail. They’ll lobby the Legislature. They’ll throw some more money at people and businesses which are financially distressed, using state-sanctioned terms like ‘tangible benefits’ and ‘mitigation’ to decriminalize their bribery attempts. They’ll do whatever they can to stop such a logical plan.

However, this is America. This is STILL America! If WE, the PEOPLE, stand together and make our voices heard and our choices known, we can prevail. We can make rational decisions for our own energy future. In our free market, those powerful businesses have options. They can see a good opportunity and hop on board, or they can continue with their ill-advised plans and fall by the wayside when we make our desires known and insist on their implementation. We Maine citizens haven’t lost our power, yet. I fear that day is coming, if we don’t step up to the plate and begin to reassert our authority… but that day has not yet arrived. There is still time to prevent the permanent destruction of our mountain ridges and to save a quality of place and a quality of life.

I realize that my vision is a bit simplistic, but I think it deserves some serious consideration. Since I am NOT a scientist or an economist, I may be completely off-base, and I admit that. But I do know this: Mountaintop Industrial Wind is not the answer for Maine. As a steward of this land, I’m simply trying to help find a long-term solution which will save our natural resources, help reduce carbon emissions, create jobs and preserve the wonders of nature which we are so lucky to have at our back doors.

I hope you will become involved and be a part of the solution, too.

Respectfully Submitted,

Karen Bessey Pease

Lexington Twp., Maine

http://karenbesseypease.blogspot.com/

Views: 117

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Karen Bessey Pease on June 22, 2010 at 8:08pm
Mmmm. We lucked out, there. Perhaps we should write to Mr. King and remind him that there are great ones whom he could emulate. Such would be a far superior legacy to the one he'll be leaving if his misguided plans go forward.
Comment by alice mckay barnett on June 22, 2010 at 7:28pm
i wish all former governors were as baxter
Comment by Karen Bessey Pease on June 22, 2010 at 7:24pm
Thanks, Alice. That photo was taken from one of the homes in Highland which has a panoramic view of Witham, Bald, Briggs and Burnt... each slated for 400 foot towers if former governor King's permit is approved.

Ugh....
Comment by alice mckay barnett on June 22, 2010 at 7:22pm
visual is beautiful
Comment by Karen Bessey Pease on June 22, 2010 at 6:33pm
Hi Scarlett. Actually, Mother Earth News is considering this article for publication. If that doesn't pan out, I'll find a venue for it. It is too long for an LTE (most papers only accept 300 word LTE's, and I've used and abused the two who have let me go up to 700 words. This one is a thousand, and that's a tough sell). The PPH and Morning Sentinel already have committed to printing a different one I recently sent them... but I'm working on it. Thanks for the encouragement! Kaz
Comment by Scarlett on June 22, 2010 at 6:25pm
I see that this just got posted on a Facebook page!! that's a step in the right direction....
Comment by Scarlett on June 22, 2010 at 6:22pm
well-said! Now, let's get that message out to the general public who need to hear it! If read only by those checking with site, it ends up being 'preaching to the choir'....how about submitting this to the Bangor Daily News editorial page? Also, there are more and more studies (REAL studies - peer-reviewed research studies, not reports produced for the wind companies by their well-paid biostitutes) showing that commercial wind farms don't belong just anywhere. Maine has YET to determine just how many wind farms we need, given all of the environmental issues at stake. Where Baldacci's magic number comes from, no one knows. But it is bass-ackwards. First, determine how we want to allocate our existing resources (forests, coastlines, wildlife, etc.), THEN decide where best to site wind farms. Right now it's a 'first-come-first-served', with no assurance that if a farm is sited at Site X, that would mean there won't be one sited at SITE Y. Good writing!! But get it out to a broader audience!!
Comment by Karen Bessey Pease on June 22, 2010 at 4:54pm
Well, heck. I can't seem to insert spaces between my paragraphs OR indent them at the beginning! Sorry...

But all the words seem to have been copied into this posting, so I hope you'll pardon the rest of the mess. There is MUCH I don't know about computers!

Kaz

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service