THE STATES ASSESS A PER TON CARBON DIOXIDE TAX ON FOSSIL FUEL PLANTS, WHILE ISO-NE ASSESSES AN ENERGY TAX ON RATEPAYERS TO RETAIN THE SAME PLANTS.
Comment
The following is on par with "The Saudi Arabia of Wind" -- “Silicon Valley of renewable energy.”
https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2019/05/12/new-london-gets-shorted-...
Dan,
Going hog wild for RE, (wind, solar, tree burning) is a partial cause these plants became uneconomical, and also has dire consequence for electric rates, as California has proven.
California, US and Vermont Electricity Prices, All Sectors: The weighted average US prices includes high California prices and quantities, a major component of the weighted average. Table 1 shows the weighted average US price including California. See URLs
http://www.neo.ne.gov/statshtml/204/204_2017.htm
https://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/California/
If California were removed, it would lower the US average. A comparison of California versus that lower US average shows California rates, all sectors, increased 28.36% and US rates (wo/California) only 5.45% during the 2010 - 2018 period.
California’s irrational/over-the-top/expensive RE efforts are demonstrating, the more highly subsidized RE, the higher the electric rates. But that is only a part of the cost picture, because not all costs end up in the rate schedules, as shown in section 1.
Vermont: The Vermont rates, all sectors, as posted by EIA, do not include the Efficiency Vermont surcharge and the Electric Assistance Program fee tacked onto electric bills by politicians to finance pseudo-social programs.
The EV surcharge has been increasing from about 6% in 2010 to about 8.0% in 2018 for most households.
If EV and EAP charges were added, Vermont rates increased 16.34% and US rates (w/tiny Vermont) only 7.63% during the 2010 - 2018 period. See table.
http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/efficiency-vermont
Year/All sectors |
CA |
US, w/CA |
US wo/CA |
VT wo/EV + EAP |
VT w/EV + EAP |
c/kWh |
c/kWh |
c/kWh |
c/kWh |
c/kWh |
|
2010 |
13.01 |
9.83 |
9.58 |
13.24 |
14.03 |
2011 |
13.05 |
9.9 |
9.66 |
13.8 |
14.67 |
2012 |
13.53 |
9.84 |
9.55 |
14.22 |
15.14 |
2013 |
14.30 |
10.07 |
9.74 |
14.61 |
15.62 |
2014 |
15.15 |
10.44 |
10.07 |
14.57 |
15.62 |
2015 |
15.42 |
10.41 |
10.02 |
14.41 |
15.46 |
2016 |
15.23 |
10.27 |
9.89 |
14.46 |
15.57 |
2017 |
16.06 |
10.48 |
10.05 |
14.6 |
15.77 |
2018 |
16.70 |
10.58 |
10.11 |
15.09 |
16.33 |
Increase, % |
28.36 |
7.63 |
5.45 |
13.97 |
16.34 |
Household Electric Bill With and Without Efficiency Vermont Surcharge: The GMP energy $/kWh for “households” is significantly greater than for “all sectors”. Here are the data from my recent bills; "household" rates are significantly higher than "all sectors".
1 |
Billing period |
|
19-Apr |
19-Mar |
19-Feb |
. |
20-Dec |
. |
20-Oct |
20-Sep |
2 |
Usage, kWh |
|
513 |
740 |
885 |
869 |
545 |
496 |
||
3 |
Total bill w/EEC, $ |
|
102.29 |
139.38 |
164.39 |
162.58 |
108.12 |
99.30 |
||
4 |
Unit cost, $/kWh |
(3/2) |
0.1994 |
0.1884 |
0.1858 |
0.1871 |
0.1984 |
0.2002 |
||
5 |
GMP energy, $/kWh |
|
0.1645 |
0.1645 |
0.1645 |
|
0.1645 |
|
0.1567 |
0.1567 |
6 |
EE surcharge, $ |
|
7.03 |
10.15 |
12.13 |
12.28 |
7.70 |
7.01 |
||
7 |
Total bill wo/EEC, $ |
(3-6) |
95.26 |
129.23 |
152.26 |
150.3 |
100.42 |
92.29 |
||
8 |
Bill increase due to EEC, % |
(3/7) |
7.38 |
7.85 |
7.97 |
8.17 |
7.67 |
7.60 |
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine