The End of Fossil Fuels in the US? Its share was 79% in 2021

"Today in Energy" would like to wish you a happy Fourth of July. New articles will resume on Monday, July 11.

https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/the-end-of-fossil-fuel...

.

Fossil fuels—petroleum, natural gas, and coal—accounted for 79% of the 97 quadrillion Btu of primary energy consumption in the United States during 2021. 10^15 Btu = 1 quad

.

About 21% of U.S. primary energy consumption in 2021 came from fuel sources other than fossil fuels, such as pre-existing hydro, pre-existing nuclear, and highly subsidized, expensive, dysfunctional  renewables , mainly wind, biomass (burning trees and ethanol from corn) and a smidgen of highly subsidized, expensive solar, according to data in our Monthly Energy Review.

.

.

Consumption was down 7 quad in 2020, due to COVID, which was the largest annual decrease on record.

Consumption recovered 4 quad in 2021, the largest annual increase on record.

It was mostly attributable to a gradual return to pre-COVID levels

.

Consumption of renewable energy increased slightly from 11.5 quad in 2020 to a record of 12.2 quad in 2021.

Increased use of renewables for electricity generation, including wind and solar, was partially offset by a decreased hydro-electricity.

Nuclear totaled 8.2 quads in 2020, the lowest level since 2012.

Petroleum has been the most-consumed primary energy source in the United States since surpassing coal in 1950.

Consumption of petroleum in the United States remains less than its 2005 peak, totaling 35 quads in 2021.

U.S. natural gas consumption totaled 31.3 quads in 2021, a slight decrease from the previous year.

U.S. coal consumption increased to 10.5 quad in 2021, marking the first annual increase since 2013.

U.S. coal consumption has fallen by more than half since its peak in 2005.

Increased gas generation offset most of the coal decrease and reduced most of the CO2

.

U.S. energy consumption

Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review

.

Our Monthly Energy Review's pre-1949 estimates of U.S. energy use are based on two sources: Sam Schurr and Bruce Netschert’s Energy in the American Economy, 1850–1975: Its History and Prospects and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Circular No. 641, Fuel Wood Used in the United States 1630–1930.

Appendix D of our Monthly Energy Review compiles these estimates of U.S. energy consumption in 10-year increments from 1635 through 1845 and 5-year increments from 1845 through 1945. Data for 1949 through the present day are available in the latest Monthly Energy Review.

Principal contributor: Owen Comstock

THE END OF FOSSIL FUEL IS FICTION

Essay by Eric Worrall

Here is an example of diluted thinking in government

“… Even though we might be seeing record high prices at the moment, and therefore record high revenue for governments, the overall trend is going to be downwards. …”

The fingerprints of climate change are all over a budget navigating an economy in transition 

By climate reporter Jess Davis and climate lead Tim Leslie
Posted Sat 18 May 2024 at 5:35am

Modelling of natural disasters in different climate scenarios could see government spending increase exponentially.

Preparing for the end of the fossil fuel era 

While it’s full of figures and tables, the budget also is an opportunity for the government to draw attention to things it thinks are important.

And this year it highlighted by an unexpected boon from record fossil fuel profits. 

“Strong corporate profits, including from iron ore and coal prices in late 2023 and early 2024 exceeding those assumed in MYEFO, and robust demand, contribute to an upgraded company tax outlook,” the papers say.

But it is also warning that we can’t keep relying on these profits in the future.

“Australia’s exports will be increasingly comprised of low carbon products.

As the world commits to net zero, and coal, oil and gas start to decline, there should be less tax revenue coming into the government as well, which will have an effect on the budget,” she said.

Read more: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-18/federal-budget-2024-climate-...

The above, in my opinion, is a prime example of deluded thinking

The only downward pressure on fossil fuel use in Western nations is regulatory lunacy, and the ongoing export of our manufacturing industry to other nations, aka de-industrialization.

Fossil fuel powered manufacturing is still happening, and we are very much still using the products of a coal based economy, but because the coal and gas burning is happening in other countries, greens frantically pretend we are somehow disconnecting our economies from burning carbon based fuels.

.

The only question is, what will our descendants do when the coal runs out?

Because it is inevitable we will burn or otherwise use every scrap of recoverable fossil fuel on the planet.

There is no chance politicians will leave fossil fuel in the ground.

Even the greenest politicians ditch their alleged principles, when they strike a rich source of fossil fuel.

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau once said, “No Country Would Find 173 Billion Barrels Of Oil In The Ground And...

.

Let us hope, when fossil fuel finally runs out, centuries from now, our descendants have figured out nuclear fusion, because the next best source of carbon after we run out of coal is either limestone or mining the ocean for its CO2 content, and doing either would take a lot of energy.

Views: 15

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Dan McKay on May 21, 2024 at 9:27am

Fossil fuels TRUMP renewables 2024 

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2025   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service