On May 22, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a highly anticipated piece of legislation - commonly referred to as “The One, Big, Beautiful Bill” (the “Bill”) - by a mostly party-line vote of 215-214-1 (two Republicans and all Democrats voted against it and one Republican voted present) that would make significant changes to the tax law if enacted. The Bill makes substantial cutbacks to various tax credits (the “Applicable Credits”) that were created or expanded under the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) (which, under current law, were generally available through the end of 2032) and imposes expanded foreign entity of concern (“FEOC”) restrictions. While advanced nuclear facilities would only experience a one-year credit window haircut under the Bill, other technologies that currently qualify under the “tech-neutral” Clean Electricity Production Tax Credit (“PTC”) (§ 45Y) and the Clean Electricity Investment Tax Credit (“ITC”) (§ 48E) would be eliminated under the Bill if construction of the applicable facility did not begin before 60 days after enactment.
Below is a high-level summary of the key changes to the Applicable Credits. The Bill uses both the Begun Construction (“BOC”) and Placed in Service (“PIS”) dates for a project to constrain the availability of the Applicable Credits. Where relevant, we have noted with an asterisk where the version of the Bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives deviates from the draft released on May 12, 2025. While the Bill has passed the U.S. House of Representatives, it is expected to be modified while under consideration in the Senate.
*Clean Electricity PTC (§ 45Y) (safe harbor for projects with a BOC date before 60 days after enactment and have a PIS date before 2029);
*Clean Electricity ITC (§ 48E) (safe harbor for projects with a BOC date before 60 days after enactment and have a PIS date before 2029);
*TRANSFERABILITY: The Bill would substantially limit the ability to transfer certain Applicable Credits pursuant to §6418. Transferability would not be available to facilities with BOC dates falling after the second anniversary of the enactment of the Bill for the Carbon Oxide Sequestration Credit (§ 45Q). Transferability would not be available for the Clean Fuel PTC (§45Z) or Advanced Manufacturing PTC (§ 45X) for credits generated after 2027.
The tables below summarize the qualification dates applicable under the Bill as passed May 22, 2025 and the Bill as initially released on May 12, 2025 for certain Applicable Credits.
Credit Provision |
2027 |
2028 |
2029 |
2030 |
2031 |
2032+ |
Transferability Terminates |
*Clean Electricity ITC |
*BOC must be before 60 days after enactment and phaseout tied to PIS |
*No change from current law |
|||||
100% |
100% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
||
*Clean Electricity PTC |
*BOC must be before 60 days after enactment and phaseout tied to PIS |
*No change from current law |
|||||
100% |
100% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
||
Carbon Oxide Sequestration Credit (§ 45Q) |
No accelerated expiration. Current law |
For equipment w/BOC more than two yrs after enactment |
|||||
*Zero-Emission Nuclear Power Production Credit (§ 45U) |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
0% |
*No change from current law |
Advanced Manufacturing PTC |
100% |
100% |
100% |
75% |
50% |
0% |
For components sold after 12/31/2027 |
Advanced Manufacturing PTC |
100% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
For components sold after 12/31/2027 |
Clean Fuel PTC (§ 45Z) |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
0% |
For fuel produced after 12/31/2027 |
Energy Property ITC |
Phaseout tied to BOC date |
For property w/BOC more than two yrs after enactment |
|||||
100% |
100% |
100% |
~87% |
~73% |
0% |
||
Unless otherwise noted, the phaseout applies to the tax year in which the credit is claimed. |
Credit Provision |
2027 |
2028 |
2029 |
2030 |
2031 |
2032+ |
Transferability Terminates |
Clean Electricity ITC |
Phaseout tied to Placed in Service (“PIS”) date |
For facilities or technology w/BOC more than 2 yrs after enactment |
|||||
100% |
100% |
80% |
60% |
40% |
0% |
||
Clean Electricity PTC |
Phaseout tied to PIS date |
For facilities w/BOC more than 2 yrs after enactment |
|||||
100% |
100% |
80% |
60% |
40% |
0% |
||
Carbon Oxide Sequestration Credit (§ 45Q) |
No accelerated expiration. Current law |
For equipment w/BOC more than 2 yrs after enactment |
|||||
Zero-Emission Nuclear Power Production Credit (§ 45U) |
100% |
100% |
80% |
60% |
40% |
0% |
For electricity produced and sold after 12/31/2027 |
Advanced Manufacturing PTC (§ 45X) (Non-Wind Components and Critical Minerals) |
100% |
100% |
100% |
75% |
50% |
0% |
For components sold after 12/31/2027 |
Advanced Manufacturing PTC (§ 45X) (Wind Components) |
100% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
For components sold after 12/31/2027 |
Clean Fuel PTC (§ 45Z) |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
0% |
For fuel produced after 12/31/2027 |
Energy Property ITC (§ 48) (Only for Geothermal Heat Property) |
Phaseout tied to BOC date |
For property w/BOC more than 2 yrs after enactment |
|||||
100% |
100% |
100% |
~87% |
~73% |
0% |
||
Unless otherwise noted, the phaseout applies to the tax year in which the credit is claimed. |
A Prohibited Foreign Entity (“PFE”) is a Specified Foreign Entity (“SFE”) or a Foreign-Influenced Entity (“FIE”). The key terms used in this summary are defined in more detail below.
PFE Connection |
Applicable |
Credits Impacted |
PFE Restriction |
If the taxpayer is an SFE… |
For credits claimed w/respect to taxable yrs beginning after enactment |
§§ 48E, 45Y, 45X, 45Q, 45U, 45Z, 48
|
…then the Bill would deny the credit. |
If the taxpayer is an FIE… |
For credits claimed w/respect to taxable yrs beginning more than two yrs after enactment |
§§ 48E, 45Y, 45X, 45Q, 45U, 45Z, 48
|
…then the Bill would deny the credit. |
If the taxpayer makes one or more “covered payments” to one or more PFEs… |
For credits claimed w/respect to taxable yrs beginning more than two yrs after enactment |
§§ 45X, 45Y, 48E |
…then the Bill would deny the credit. |
If the construction of the facility or energy storage technology or if the production of the eligible component includes any “material assistance from a PFE." |
For facility w/BOC after December 31, 2025 or, in the case of § 45X, for credits claimed w/respect to taxable yrs beginning two yrs after enactment |
§§ 45X, 45Y, 48E |
…then the Bill would deny the credit. |
If the eligible component is produced subject to a licensing agreement with a PFE… |
For credits claimed w/respect to taxable yrs beginning more than two yrs after enactment |
§ 45X |
…then the Bill would deny the credit as long as the value of such agreement is more than $1 million. |
If a taxpayer that was allowed a § 48E credit makes one or more applicable payments to a PFE before the close of the 10-yr period beginning when the eligible property was PIS… |
For credits allowed w/respect to taxable yrs beginning more than two yrs after enactment |
§ 48E |
…then the Bill would recapture 100% of the § 48E credit. Applicable payments are like covered payments (described below) but are made with respect to any taxable year during the 10-yr period beginning when the credit-eligible property was PIS. |
As noted above, a Prohibited Foreign Entity (“PFE”) is a Specified Foreign Entity (“SFE”) or a Foreign-Influenced Entity (“FIE”).
Specified Foreign Entity (“SFE”) means any one of the following:
Foreign-Influenced Entity (“FIE”) means an entity for which an SFE:
Covered payments that trigger the restrictions discussed above have two features: type and amount. The payment type must be dividends, interest, compensation for services, rentals or royalties, guarantees or any other fixed, determinable, annual or periodic amount. The amount of the payment must be equal to or greater than 5% of the taxpayer’s total expenditures during such taxable year that are related to the credit-generating investment or activity (or, in the case of multiple payments, 15% or more of same).
Material Assistance from a Prohibited Foreign Entity means any property that meets the following criteria: (i) any component, subcomponent, or critical mineral (as defined in section 45X(c)(6)) included in such property that is extracted, process, recycled, manufactured, or assembled by a PFE; and (ii) any design of such property which is based on a copyright or patent held by a PFE or any know-how or trade secret provided by a PFE.
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine