Eric Rosenbloom
Eric Rosenbloom
  • Male
  • Hartland, VT
  • United States
Share on Facebook Share Twitter
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos
 

Eric Rosenbloom's Page

Gifts Received

Gift

Eric Rosenbloom has not received any gifts yet

Give Eric Rosenbloom a Gift

Latest Activity

Profile Icon
Eric Rosenbloom commented on Long Islander's blog post 'Maine OEIS new report: Tracking Progress Toward Meeting Maine’s Wind Energy Goals, April 2011'
Interesting. Note that the tangible benefits are still reported as projected by the developers' sales pitches.
Apr 27, 2011
Profile Icon
Eric Rosenbloom commented on Long Islander's blog post 'Why is the State ignoring the state university's findings?'
It's at -0.6 kW again at 11:49 a.m., July 3, wind speed 4.1 m/s. -2.4 kW at 11:50. -2.7 kW at 11:52. I bet the cumulative production doesn't reflect these periods of net consumption.
Jul 3, 2010
Profile Icon
Whetstone_Willy left a comment for Eric Rosenbloom
Welcome Eric. With respect to your comment about the UMPI wind turbine, despite the vigilance on this site, and the fact that this turbine is a complete flop, it didn't stop the mainstream media from reporting it a "Great Success". If…
Jul 3, 2010
Profile Icon
Profile Icon
Eric Rosenbloom commented on Long Islander's blog post 'Why is the State ignoring the state university's findings?'
Fascinating resource (http://130.111.52.254/wind.asp)! Frequent refreshing shows just how variable the turbine's output is. And here's an interesting one: -0.6 kW, even though the wind is well above cut-in:
Jul 2, 2010
Profile Icon
Eric Rosenbloom is now a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine Jul 2, 2010

Comment Wall (1 comment)

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

At 11:21am on July 3, 2010, Whetstone_WillyWhetstone_Willy said…
Welcome Eric. With respect to your comment about the UMPI wind turbine, despite the vigilance on this site, and the fact that this turbine is a complete flop, it didn't stop the mainstream media from reporting it a "Great Success". If you have a moment, please read the following article that ran in the Bangor Daily News.
http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/143872.html
I would like to believe, that ultimately, this sort of shilling by newspapers is very shortsighted and will come back to bite them. But I guess it will take some patience to see.
 
 
 

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT (excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 http://pinetreewatchdog.org/2010/08/09/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/ From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" http://pinetreewatchdog.org/2010/08/11/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/ From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” http://pinetreewatchdog.org/2010/08/12/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

© 2012   Created by Eben Thurston.   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service