Sen. Matt Harrington: Reducing energy costs must be Augusta's first priority

by Matt Harrington

February 16, 2023

An elderly woman whom I met during the campaign season recognized me as I stood at her door. Before I could even begin my introduction, tears welled up in her eyes. At over 70 years old, she told me she had to ask for heating assistance.

For the first time in her life, she said she could not provide for herself. It obviously shattered her as someone who prided herself as an independent woman, and the stress of just paying for basic necessities was enough to bring her to tears.

I wish I could tell you this is the only story like that from a constituent in my district. Sadly, it's not, and it shows just how energy costs are crushing Maine families and small businesses in my district and across Maine.

For far too long, the party in power has catered to special interest groups and pursued an energy policy that has proven to be an abject failure. And despite their rhetoric, the war in Ukraine is not solely responsible for the skyrocketing energy costs facing Maine families. Several years of irresponsible energy policy from the White House to the Blaine House have contributed to these burdensome costs.

My appointment to the Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee is a first for me, and I have a lot to learn, but one thing I know is that Maine's people deserve better. I will approach every energy bill with the same question: Does it lower the cost of energy for Maine families?

I sat in on an Energy Committee meeting a few weeks ago and listened to a presentation from the Governor's Energy Office. I was disappointed at the complete lack of emphasis on reducing the cost of electricity for Maine families and small businesses. It was all about renewables.

I agree and believe that we need to focus on incorporating renewable energy into our portfolio - but only when it makes sense. As lawmakers, we must strike a balance between investing in renewable energy and lowering costs for Maine people. Right now, the pendulum has swung too far and lowering costs must be the priority; too many Maine families are struggling to put food on the table, heat their homes and put gas in their vehicles.

Maine Senate Republicans are focused on three priorities that will bring relief to Maine families and job creators.

First, we must prioritize ratepayers. We want to look at any reform of the Public Utilities Commission that will bring transparency to the contracts and the rates they set for Mainers.

Second, we must reform or repeal net-energy billing. I agree with the words of our Public Advocate, who told the Bangor Daily News last month "the program disproportionately hurts low-income people who aren't participating in community solar."

What he's saying is people who are struggling to get by should not be subsidizing solar panels on million-dollar mansions along Maine's coastline. Net-energy billing is driving up costs and it will only accelerate as more projects come online. Instead, we must reform this program to lower costs or eliminate it.

And third, we must stop picking winners and losers when it comes to energy policy. Every technology needs to be on the table, so we should remove the 100-megawatt cap on hydropower, which artificially increases rates through the renewable portfolio standards. We must also harness our robust forest products industry and encourage technologies like geothermal when it makes sense.

We cannot continue to push technologies that drive up costs. Maine people cannot afford it. Maine businesses cannot afford it.

Please continue reading at:

https://www.pressherald.com/2023/02/16/commentary-right-now-reducin...

 

Contact information for Maine State Senator Matt Harrington

STATE SENATOR – DISTRICT 33
(R – York)
Contact:
Office: (207) 287-1505
Cell: (207) 831-6746
P.O. Box 457, Sanford, ME 04073
Towns
YORK county:
Alfred; Lebanon; Sanford; and Waterboro
Current Committee Assignments
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Energy, Utilities and Technology

https://mesenategop.com/your-senators/senator-matt-harrington/

https://twitter.com/MattAHarrington

https://www.linkedin.com/in/matt-harrington-9b593999

https://www.facebook.com/MatthewAHarrington/

matthew.harrington@legislature.maine.gov

==========================================

What can we, as individuals, do to help save the planet?

By Nancy Hasenfus

February 16, 2023

Electrify, electrify, electrify! That is what we need to do to save the planet. As we see the damage that the climate crisis is causing in nature around us, we need to move quickly to end our use of fossil fuels.

To move away from fossil fuels, we need to electrify almost everything. There are two benefits to electrification: The first is that it allows us to use renewables and the second is that power lines transport energy in the form of electricity without creating carbon, unlike that fuel truck that just delivered your oil or propane. By using fossil fuels we are digging ourselves into a hole, and, as climate and energy expert Jesse Jenkins told Ezra Klein on Klein's Sept. 20 podcast, the first rule of being in a deep hole is to stop digging! Despite great technological advances, we are still dependent on fossil fuels for 80% of our energy worldwide. We need to move quickly to renewables and non-fossil fuel energy sources.

At this point only 22% of the electricity used in the U.S. comes from renewables (hydropower, wind and solar), according to the federal Energy Information Administration, but this will change in the coming decades. We need to double or possibly triple our electric grid capacity over the next three decades to distribute all this clean power. Since the 1970s, we have been coasting along on the infrastructure built by our parents and grandparents, but now we need to get busy and build new electric infrastructure. America can rise to this challenge - we have risen to challenges of similar size in the past. We will need permitting reform soon so that we can update the grid quickly and not take years to approve interstate projects, as now needed because of the widely varying state laws.

Many experts feel that we will need power from many sources to create electricity and save the planet. We have spent decades refining solar and wind technologies so that the price of installing solar is one-tenth what it was a decade ago and the cost of wind turbine installation is one-third its earlier cost, Ezra Klein's podcast guest Jesse Jenkins has noted. We need to continue the development of other clean sources so that they get more affordable, such as geothermal energy, which is relatively early in its trajectory, as well as nuclear power. Bill Gates advocates a different style of small nuclear reactors.

There are other, less-developed sources of energy that we may be able to use in the future, such as hydrogen, but we should move forward with what we have as we try to perfect the newer sources. There has been huge pushback about this from the fossil fuel industry for decades. As billions pour into the fossil fuel industry's coffers, they will not easily give up lobbying and greenwashing, but more and more of the people around the United States and worldwide realize what they are doing.

https://www.pressherald.com/2023/02/16/maine-voices-what-can-we-as-...

************************************* 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views: 125

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Dan McKay on February 19, 2023 at 9:02am

Comment by Dan McKay on February 19, 2023 at 7:30am

             NET ENERGY BILLING 

Comment by Dan McKay on February 19, 2023 at 7:19am

        Maine received $122.8M in proceeds from FY08-FY2020

 

Comment by Dan McKay on February 19, 2023 at 7:01am

Comment by Willem Post on February 18, 2023 at 1:39pm

The lifetime of a Prius is at least 12 years, of an EV at most 8 years

That difference is erroneously omitted by “pseudo analysts”

Comment by Willem Post on February 18, 2023 at 1:37pm

These government people are so screwed up, they cannot see the forest for the trees.

Do they not see any CO2 reduction has to start with significant energy consumption by means of efficient housing and transportation, with high-mileage vehicles, such as the 4 wheel drive Prius which get more than 50 miles per gallon, and has a life time CO2 much less than any EV with a 60 kWh battery or greater

Comment by Dan McKay on February 18, 2023 at 12:28pm

It is going to get even worse for the ratepayers, Senator Harrington.


From 2008 to 2020, Maine ratepayers have spent $154,520,393 purchasing renewable energy credits (REC) to incentivize the construction of renewable projects.


The portfolio standard includes  Class I,  Class IA, and  Class II categories from which retail competitive electricity suppliers must provide proof of renewable energy credits purchases matching the percentage requirements of each class.


For Class I, the Renewable Energy Credits must represent 10% of the total amount of electricity each retail supplier sells to Maine customers For Class IA the Credit percentage for 2023 is 11%, up from 2.5% for 2020 and scheduled to grow to 40% in 2030For Class II, the credit percentage remains at 30% since 2000.  

The latest numbers from the PUC is for the year 2020.in the " ANNUAL REPORT ON NEW RENEWABLE RESOURCE PORTFOLIO REQUIREMENT" Compliance to Class I credits required the ratepayer purchase of 1,042,500 RECs at an Average price of $5.97 each (High Price = $20.50 each)
                        Class IA credits required the purchase of 93.918 RECs at an average price of $4.64 each (High Price = $20.50 each)                      

                        Class II credits required the purchase of 3,063,231 RECs at an average price of $1.30 each (High Price = $ 4.07 each)   

                                                                                                                                              One REC is allocated to each megawatt-hour of production by qualifying plants.


The REC program is a separate market from the wholesale electric market administered by ISO-NE. The cost of RECs is attached to bills by the retailers. Whether the retailers bump up the price they pay for RECs in the REC market before it becomes the supply portion on our bills is not known. The numbers offered by the PUC show a 50-cent surcharge added to the 500 KW-Hour Monthly bill. For 2020.


The REC market could very well become a wrecking ball to future bills for 2 reasons. Supply and Demand.


Maine embraces biomass in all 3 classes. Most states do not include biomass in their portfolios which makes Maine the only market for biomass RECs In 2020.

Ratepayers purchased 1,187,133 Biomass RECs for compliance to the Maine RPS. For Class i. Biomass RECs accounted for 94.85% of all Class I Recs

Biomass RECs accounted for 93.68% of all Class IA RECs and for 3.62% of Class II Recs


The EIA ( The USA Energy Information Administration) discloses biomass production for listed Maine biomass plants as 1,080,316 megawatt-hours in 2020. Going forward, it appears biomass production will not keep up with policy demands and Maine will need to seek RECs from other sources within a vast larger and more competitive market. Prices will rise dramatically from demand as other states are accelerating their portfolio requirements towards 100% renewables. 


New England states are banking on offshore wind as the golden pot of RECs to reach 100% Green New Deal Goals.


Remember, RECs are just one piece of the many policies adopted by the state. RGGI costs ratepayers millions, EMT costs ratepayers millions, NEB costs ratepayers millions. ISO-NE catering to the renewable cabal costs ratepayers millions. 

The Maine PUC used to display information about renewable program costs, as below, but stopped for reasons they will not disclose.

Comment by Willem Post on February 18, 2023 at 8:26am

That should be done by buildings thousands of highly-sealed/highly-insulated housing units, EACH YEAR, with r20 basement, r40 walls, r60 roofs, r8 doors and windows, blower door tested, with air to air heat recovery system, and ground source heat pumps, that work great, even if -20F

That would really be helpful for the already, long-suffering Maine people, that are being bombarded with one nonsense measure after another that benefits certain legislators and special in, and screws everyone else big time.

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service