Offshore Wind Blades Not Too Big To Fail

350 Foot Blade 

#Some of the material was derived from the late Edgar Gunter PhD who taught mechanical engineering for 34 years at the University of Virginia (UVA) Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering and was the founder of UVA’s Rotor Dynamics Laboratory. RIP 8/14/2024

Offshore Wind Blades Testing And Certification 
Not too big to fail 
.

Climate activists have renewable energy goals to be met by 2025 and 2030. The main goal is carbon neutrality by 2050. 

.

The world's biggest companies, investors, cities, and regions have combined forces to push local and state governments to increase their 2025 climate goals. The pressure is on and big mistakes can happen. 

.

To reach these renewable goals fossil fuel plants are shut down with massive ocean wind projects taking up the slack. The bigger the megawatt wind turbine the more chance of attaining the renewable energy goals. The newly installed ocean turbines are over 800 feet tall with 350-foot blades. 

.

Tests in 2022 were conducted in Massachusetts to test a prototype 350-foot wind turbine blade before producing 150 blades in Canada for the ongoing ocean project today. 

.

There was nowhere in the world available to test a 350-foot blade. The Massachusetts site could only test a blade up to 300 feet. To test the prototype blade they had to cut more than 50 feet off the blade and more than likely place weight on the cut-off end to make up for the missing blade section. 

.

Engineers have to extrapolate the figures from the 300-foot section to the 350-foot section. The blade made it through the tests and was certified 

.

Several of these 350-foot blades in service have failed off Nantucket and Europe 

.

These blades are so large, they oscillate in the wind. The tips of the blades travel around in a circle over 700 feet wide. The wind speeds at the top are much higher than at the bottom. The result is constantly varying speeds. 

.

The result of a blade break around 50 feet from the rotor or center of the turbine could be what is called classic torsional fatigue. 

.

These 350-foot large blades are made in a fiberglass shell and lack expensive reinforcing carbon fiber. At least one blade should have been tested in a NASA wind tunnel before mass production.

.

In 1997 there was a warning from LM Glasfiber of Denmark, following several instances of stress cracks appearing on blades subjected to violent edgewise oscillation. 

.

The damage from edgewise oscillation has amounted to serious longitudinal cracks on the trailing edge of the blade several yards from the root. The root is the structure holding the outer part of the blade to the rotor or center.

.

One blade before 1997 oscillated so much it hit the tower causing the blade to break and fall to the ground. The cure was to install vibration detectors to avoid acute blade damage. 

.

The oscillation problem has been known about for more than 25 years. The oscillation occurs on all wind turbine blades but increases with the length and weight of the blades. 

.

The oscillation can start with blade stiffness, temperature, and wind gusts. Why install the new 13-megawatt ocean wind turbines without the vibration detectors?  

.

A lot of financing went into the 350-foot blades but they are so big they may fail without carbon fiber reinforcing. 

Note# For years the wind industry denied wind turbine infra-sound. The US Dept of Energy was aware of the infra-sound from a Mod 1 wind turbine in Boone, North Carolina in 1985. 

.Massachusetts test site

Testing 350-foot blades in 300-foot test site - Cut over 50 feet off and extrapolate the figures for production NG 

.

Views: 143

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on August 25, 2024 at 2:26pm

Rasmussen Reports Finds that 3% of 2020 Voters were Non-Citizens Who Plan to Vote Again in 2024 (Video)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/08/rasmussen-reports-finds-th...

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on August 24, 2024 at 11:19am

Video of RFK Jr's Trump Endorsement Speech - Friday, August 23, 2024
https://www.c-span.org/video/?537941-1/robert-f-kennedy-jr-makes-pr...

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2025   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service