Offshore Wind and Low Information Voters

As of January 2025, the Biden administration said it had approved offshore wind to power approximately 840,000 Massachusetts homes, which accounts for around one-third of all housing units. Massachusetts has a total of 2,621,989 housing units, with single-family homes comprising 1,515,125 units. 
.
Offshore wind is an intermittent power source requiring high-voltage onshore electric substations and battery backup from fossil fuel power plants. If the wind drops below 6 miles per hour, 840,000 homes in Massachusetts will not receive any power.  
.
Offshore wind is intermittent, as wind speeds can vary significantly, leading to fluctuations in electricity generation, and requires extensive battery backup and electric substations in residential neighborhoods. The onshore wind cables can carry as much as 345,000 volts.
.
Offshore wind energy has very high costs compared to other energy sources. These costs result in higher electricity rates for consumers. The same ratepayers also pay government subsidies for building offshore wind projects and ocean wind ports. Taxpayers and ratepayers are paying as much as 50 percent of offshore wind projects, and are only going to get a higher electric bill. 
.

Offshore wind projects face lawsuits over federal approvals and multiple executive orders from the current administration. Individual states are trying to direct the federal government on how to power the country. The Trump administration's alternative to wind is SMR, or small, safe, modular reactors, which produce power 24/7. 

.

Accidents like the 70-ton Nantucket blade failure raise questions of safety and reliability.. 

.

There is a history of evidence linking offshore wind farms to whale deaths; since the construction of the Block Island, Rhode Island, wind project, whale deaths have followed the project.

.

Scientific and research groups have received funding from offshore wind projects, as well as political contributions to endorse. The news media receive millions in advertising from offshore wind companies. 

.

The Atlantic hurricane season peaks between August and September. Offshore wind farms face risks during hurricane season due to high winds that exceed and could test the design limits of turbines.
.

Massachusetts, for example, committed by 2008 to installing 2000 megawatts of land-based wind power by 2020. Politicians told low-information voters the state was going to be the "Saudi Arabia of wind." The land-based wind projects were a catastrophic failure.

.

After 17 years, Massachusetts has less than 100 megawatts of land-based wind power. There needs to be an audit. 
.
Misinformed voters continue to believe, twenty years later, that offshore wind can power 840,000 homes.
.

Views: 39

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain 23 hours ago

A quick look at the online home pages of the Press Herald, Maine Public, NPR, CNN, LA Times and Washington Post shows not a single reference to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's bombshell.  It appears that for now, their strategy is a total news blackout.  Ever wonder why Dems and Repubs have such tremendously different views on things?

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain 23 hours ago

Gen. Michael Flynn: "This is the biggest crime in the history of America"

Other Names That Have Never Been Exposed — NSA, FBI, CIA — Are Going To Be In Big Trouble.

https://rumble.com/v6we568-flynn-other-names-that-have-never-been-e...

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain 23 hours ago

Tulsi Gabbard Releases Bombshell Evidence Exposing ‘Years-Long Coup’ Against Trump: ‘Egregious Abuse of Power’
https://slaynews.com/news/tulsi-gabbard-releases-bombshell-evidence...

Why is there not a peep on Tulsi Gabbard's bombshell evidence on the NY Times front page today?

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2025   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service