The UN, that irrelevant body of nations that has not gotten anything right since the 60's, is at it again.  With all the turmoil going on in the world, mostly based on religious extremes, they have been promoting the idea that it is all based on CLIMATE CHANGE.  They have taken on the role as leader in flim flamming the world population that we here in the US are going to have to pay for everyone else's problems, and our Executive "leadership" has bought into it at the Paris Conference this year.  The trillions of dollars spent have done little to change the climate that Al Gore and others told us almost  20 years ago would devastate the coasts and burn up the population.

The changes in climate have been going on for millions of years.  We have been very much warmer within the last several millennials and very much colder.  These were times when there was no massive CO2 emissions, a minuscule gas that is NEEDED for life.  The science they are hanging their hats on from East Anglia, NOAA, Penn State and others is flawed . . . it conveniently leaves out data that does not fit their theory.  This is FRAUD!  A good scientist does not make a theory stand up by ignoring some of the research and then declare it "settled".  We all agree that GRAVITY exists, otherwise we would float off into space, but what causes gravity is only a theory, and that was proven by another Albert, one that is a little smarter than Al Gore, Albert Einstein.  

Climate change is a greedy scheme to make a lot of elite politicians and crooked business types (often one and the same) very wealthy at the expense of the people who go out and put in 30 - 80 hours a week collecting a paycheck. We are the ones paying the freight on higher power prices, loss of jobs, bankruptcies, extraordinary EPA rulings limiting our freedom, and the list goes on.

Views: 173


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Pineo Girl on August 29, 2016 at 4:38pm

65% of the worlds toxic emissions come from developing nations!

Comment by Paula D Kelso on August 29, 2016 at 11:51am

Refreshed my memory on the UN charter. guess there's plenty of wiggle room in it for debating goals and strategies.

Comment by Pineo Girl on August 29, 2016 at 11:09am

Direct quote  " One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy.  So what is the goal of environmental policy?  We redistribute, de facto, the world's wealth through climate Policy." Omar Edenhofer, former co-chair of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Comment by Paula D Kelso on August 28, 2016 at 9:49pm

Along about 1962, our high school debate topic was: "Resolved that the United Nations should be significantly strengthened". I don't recall the arguments pro and con, probably along the lines of national sovreignty (sp?) and the challenges of the cold war, etc. The intent I guess was to increase the UN's military strength. I'm pretty sure no one ever argued that the droughts of the '30's caused a flow of population to the urban areas and that caused the Second World War 'cause people packed into cities start wars. So the UN needed strengthening to enforce an intervention with Nature.

But if I read this article right, climate change is causing war in Syria so if we want a peaceful world the UN needs this person who's an expert on climate change and getting people to cooperate as its new leader. So we shouldn't blame wars on people. People aren't to be held accountable for their actions cause we're all controlled by this dastardly climate change evil. So all the rich people and rich countries in the world need to facilitate a global change in every facet of our economic, social and political life styles or Armageddon is upon us.

I never was a student of the classics much, surely this somehow mimics some tragic conflict between the forces of good and evil and the heroic intervention of some iconic creature or character. Me thinks this crusade to save the Earth and it's people has to do more with the less admirable qualities of human nature than with the evil nature of the Earth's climate. Many otherwise well intentioned people can get caught up in a crusade and lose their equilibrium. Friends become foes and ideas become holy grail. If you don't accept the global warming doctrine and work to rid the planet of this great calamity, you are pond scum and must be beaten into submission. There did I mix enough metaphors?

Comment by Paul Ackerman on August 28, 2016 at 1:03pm

I totally agree with your description of the scenario,and it is cold comfort to know that we will have adjoining huts in the re-education centers when the moonbats start arresting all of us climate -deniers.

Do you think that the mainstream media and academics will ever see the fraud in all this,or is it just so PC now to be uber-liberal that it is hopeless?

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.”

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

© 2020   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service