News Story Source: CommonWealth Magazine

Power politics in Maine

Through proxies, Mass. seeks to overturn law backed by 59% of Maine voters

Source : 
 Nov 30, 2021
 

MASSACHUSETTS OFFICIALS are counting on a Maine court to overturn a law passed in early November by 59 percent of Maine voters so a power line carrying hydroelectricity from Quebec can resume construction.

The legal arguments in favor of overturning the law seem convincing, but victory in this case may come at a high cost. Massachusetts electricity ratepayers, through the proxy contractors they have hired in Maine, now find themselves trying to build a transmission line in a state whose residents don’t want it. Even if the law passed via referendum by voters is overturned and other court challenges are resolved, bad blood between the two states is likely to linger for some time.

The company building the transmission line, called New England Clean Energy Connect, is seeking an injunction to block the voter-approved law from taking effect on December 19. In its legal brief, the company argues that it complied with all existing laws; obtained the necessary federal, state, and local permits and approvals; and spent $450 million on the project to date. The brief says the new law attempts to go back in time and make illegal what was legal then.

“To permit such a retroactive application of the initiative would render any development in the state, no matter how big or how small, or how far progressed, vulnerable to discriminatory efforts to kill the project by after-the-fact changes to the law, and inevitably chill future economic development in Maine,” the legal brief said.

In an interview on “Boston Public Radio” on Monday, Gov. Charlie Baker said the case raises an important legal question about applying laws retroactively. He also suggested that decarbonizing the economy and reducing reliance on fossil fuels requires some tradeoffs and some help from other states.

“It doesn’t come without some degree of change in the way we have thought historically about how much power we have in the grid, how it gets there, and how it operates,” he said.

Rep. Jeffrey Roy of Franklin, the House chair of the Legislature’s Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy Committee, said he believes the challenge to the voter-approved law on constitutional grounds has a good chance of success. He acknowledges there may be some blowback if the challenge is successful, but said the courts are the place to settle the issue.

“I understand the opposition,” he said of Maine voters who rejected the transmission line via the ballot question. “I’m wondering if that opposition is too late.”

Sen. Michael Barrett of Lexington, the Senate chair of the Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy Committee, thinks the lawsuit by New England Clean Energy Connect challenging the voter-approved law has merit. But he says the situation illustrates how the federal government should have oversight of transmission projects that run across state lines or, in this case, across international borders.

“It should never have been the province of the state of Maine,” he said.

Barrett is hopeful the Maine project will move forward, but if it doesn’t he said a major reevaluation of the state’s climate change plans needs to take place. Roy thinks the state should focus on expanding its offshore wind and solar power resources, but Barrett isn’t sure either one can be ramped up very quickly.

“All of us, the Legislature included, need to reboot and figure out what Plan B really looks like,” Barrett said.

Eliza Townsend of the Appalachian Mountain Club in Maine said she hopes the voter-approved Maine law prevails. She blames Massachusetts for causing the dispute in the first place by holding a bidding process for a transmission line to Quebec and selecting the bidders with the lowest prices instead of the bidders with the strongest public backing.

Meet the Author

Bruce Mohl

EditorCommonWealth

The first choice of Massachusetts was a project that would have had the transmission line come through New Hampshire. It was shot down by regulators there because it ran through the White Mountains. The second choice was New England Clean Energy Connect in Maine, which is now facing pushback from voters because of its path through wooded countryside. Townsend said Massachusetts bypassed a Vermont project that had strong public support because it would have kept the transmission line out of sight by running it underneath Lake Champlain and then underground.

“The decision came down to money,” Townsend said. “The Vermont project wasn’t the lowest bid.”

News Link: 

https://commonwealthmagazine.org/energy/power-politics-in-maine/

Views: 48

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Art Brigades on December 3, 2021 at 11:44am

AMC's Townsend implies that "the Vermont project" should be built instead of NECEC. Vermont's line is indeed a little more expensive, but don't think for a minute that it would be sail without all these people lighting their hair on fire like they did for Northern Pass and NECEC.

Vermont should ALSO be built and utilized. If we are going to electrify our society, then we will need 5000 or 10,000 additional MW of electricity supply in the near future. That's at least five more NECEC-like projects.

The 20 years young natural gas generation plants in Veazie, Westbrook, Rumford, Bucksport have a combined capacity of about 1500 MW, but they for the last couple of years have been operating below 20%. The 800 MW oil-fired Wyman station operates only a few days per year. But we are giving millions to all of these plants in capacity payments just to keep them online and available. And millions more in bonus peak pricing when they do get the call from a desperate grid operator.

Unless there is alternative capacity that is dispatchable, these five plants are not going anywhere.  

Indeed, as we buy more heat pumps and electric vehicles, these fossil plants will again be in demand to fire up and actually generate power.

If the Appalachian Mountain Club (and their counterparts) really wants to shut down those polluting plants, why on earth do they oppose a paltry little power line that gets them what they say they want?

Can't wait til they finally attend math class and learn what a couple thousand 50-story wind turbines (AND a web of transmission) looks like in their "pristine wilderness."

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

© 2022   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service