Market Risks Are Seen in Energy Innovations

Market Risks Are Seen in Energy Innovations




WASHINGTON — The same market forces that doomed Solyndra, the solar cell manufacturer that received $528 million in governmentloans and then went bankrupt, could imperil other manufacturing ventures that have received loan guarantees from the Energy Department, energy experts warned this week.

Green

A blog about energy and the environment.

The problem is that even if a company with a cutting-edge technology manages to build a factory on time and at the anticipated cost, the market price of its product can collapse before its rollout, they said. That is what happened to Solyndra and its solar powerarrays, experts say, as the supply of solar panels from other factories increased and demand lagged.

Administration officials acknowledge that the market creates risks that loan guarantees will not be repaid. But they emphasize that the loan program’s purpose is to take risks so that it can help important new industries incubate.

Not all of the loans are so risky. Energy Department officials told a House subcommittee looking into the bankruptcy on Wednesday that the loan guarantees for power-generation ventures like wind and solar farms tend to be safer. Before a power generation loan is approved and the equipment is readied, Jonathan Silver, the head of the Energy Department’s loan program office, testified, the electricity is contracted for by utilities.

That guarantees an income stream, he said. While factories may have a few orders in hand, they generally cannot sell years of future production before they break ground.

The Department of Energy has guaranteed loans of nearly $2.5 billion to companies that will make electric cars, a product whose market size is uncertain. Some analysts have concluded lately that there may be an oversupply of some components.

“Based on the production capacity that’s been announced or planned, we expect there to be more batteries than there are vehicles to put them in,” said Kevin C. See, an analyst at Lux Research, which predicts substantial consolidation among the would-be manufacturers in the months or years ahead.

While the market for Solyndra’s product, solar cells, is gaining in maturity and is somewhat predictable, the market for electric cars is less certain, analysts add.

“In the case of manufacturing electric vehicles or batteries for electric vehicles, it’s basically speculation as to whether you think they’re going to have customers, ‘’ Mr. See said.

Another analytical firm, Bloomberg New Energy Finance, reached a similar conclusion last week, saying that the manufacturing capacity for specialized lithium-ion batteries will greatly exceed the need “unless demand by automakers increases significantly in the short term.”

Battery prices are “poised to fall,” Bloomberg said, just as a decline in solar panel prices hit Solyndra.

Nissan North America has a loan guarantee of up to $1.448 billion for retooling a factory in Smyrna, Tenn., and building the Nissan Leaf, including the battery. In a telephone interview on Friday, Mr. Silver of the Energy Department said that the company, a “triple-B-plus investment-grade company, has the wherewithal to ensure repayment” even if electric vehicle sales prove to be weak.      

Mr. Silver said that the Energy Department’s loan guarantee program was supposed to take some risks.  “Congress directed us to identify technologies that could be brought to market in an effort to leapfrog the United States forward and re-establish innovation leadership,” he said. “ Our job is to identify those technologies and build them out.”

A company spokeswoman for Nissan, Katherine Zachary, said that the Leaf was “selling great,” although total deliveries so far total only about 6,100. “If we had more, we’d sell more,” she said.

Fisker Automotive got $529 million to develop and build two kinds of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles at a factory in Wilmington, Del. Tesla Motors got $465 million to reopen a factory in Fremont, Calif., to produce all-electric vehicles and to make battery packs, electric motors and other components. They both buy batteries from other suppliers, but their success depends on an electric vehicle market.

Adding another layer of uncertainty, experts say, electric car sales rely heavily on inducements to consumers by state and federal governments, and in an era of budget-cutting, it is not clear how generous the governments will continue to be.

The size of the future market for solar cells is also somewhat uncertain. But a former energy aide in the Clinton White House, speaking on condition of anonymity because he did not want to be drawn into the political debate over Solyndra, said that predicting the market for electric cars was much harder. “The electric vehicle market is much more based on an uncertain regulatory future and uncertain consumer preference,” he said.

The Solyndra bankruptcy has already renewed a Congressional debate about the federal government’s ability to pick winners and losers in the commercial marketplace.

“I think we have other Solyndras out there,” said Representative Cliff Stearns, a Florida Republican and chairman of the oversight and investigations committee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which held the hearing on Solyndra.

“The government should not be picking winners and losers — that’s what they’re doing with Nissan, Tesla and Fisker,” he said in an interview. “They’re at risk in an global open competitive market.”

Representative Diana DeGette of Colorado, the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee, said in an interview after Wednesday’s hearing that any taxpayer investment in a green industry could be threatened by a decision by China to move into that industry and flood the market with subsidized goods, which is what happened with solar cells.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/16/science/earth/16loan.html?_r=1

 

********************************* 

Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

Views: 65

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service