Maine woods could store more carbon at current harvest with 'climate smart' forestry, study finds

I'm not sure at all as to what to think about this article, so I'm just posting it without any real opinion.

That said, we have long thought that Maine's status as the most forested state, along with its relatively low population, dwarfed any effect on CO2 which the fraudulent wind industry claimed would result from wind power. This was detailed here, well over 10 years ago: https://www.windtaskforce.org/page/nrcm-s-co2-analysis

Note that Alec Giffen, mentioned in the article, chaired Governor John Baldacci's Task Force on Wind Power Development, a group which greased the skids for the wind industry's assault on the state of Maine, some 15 years ago.

https://www.windtaskforce.org/page/the-expedited-wind-law

These are the task force members. Publicover was an alternate.

R. Alec Giffen (Chair), Director, Maine Forest Service
Senator Phillip Bartlett
Juliet Browne, Verrill Dana LLP
Pete Didisheim, Director of Advocacy, Natural Resources Council of Maine
Judith A. Dorsey, Retired Lawyer
Representative Stacey Fitts
Senator Walter Gooley
Jody Jones, Wildlife Ecologist, Maine Audubon Society
John Kerry, Director, Governor’s Office of Energy Independence & Security
Kathleen Leyden, Coastal Program Manager, State Planning Office
David Littell, Commissioner, Dept. of Environmental Protection
Representative W. Bruce MacDonald
Milton McBreairty, Business Manager, IBEW Local Union 567
Patrick McGowan, Commissioner, Dept. of Conservation
Dave Publicover, Appalachian Mountain Club (alternate member)
Steve Timpano, Environmental Coordinator, Dept. of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife
David Wilby, Executive Director, Independent Energy Producers of Maine

ARTICLE:

Maine woods could store more carbon at current harvest with 'climate smart' forestry, study finds

Maine Public | By Susan Sharon
Published March 6, 2023 at 5:17 PM EST

Maine forests already absorb about 70% of the state's annual fossil fuel emissions. Now, a new study shows that Maine's commercial forest landowners could increase annual carbon storage by at least 20% over the next 60 years while maintaining timber harvest levels. The findings are timely as the demand for carbon offset projects accelerates.

The forest modeling study across 7.6 million acres of mostly privately-owned commercial forest lands in northern Maine was conducted by researchers from the University of Maine, the New England Forestry Foundation and the U.S. Forest Service. Under current management practices, the forestlands are expected to remove 36 million metric tons of CO2 per year. But, if climate smart strategies such as increased planting, thinning and selective harvesting were widely adopted, the study suggests even more carbon could be stored without decreasing harvest levels.

"Unless you maintain harvest there's the potential for there to really be no benefits to the atmosphere," said Tom Walker, a natural resources economist and project coordinator.

"If a landowner in Maine cuts back on their harvest and stores more carbon, which makes a lot of sense, [and] if somebody else cuts that wood in Maine or in the U.S. or in the world, you know, there's no net benefit to the atmosphere," Walker said.

The study's authors also say undertaking these improvements could be done at relatively low cost compared to other ways of mitigating climate change. The research comes as demand from companies looking to offset their carbon emissions through forest carbon removal projects increased four-fold between 2020 and 2021. Alec Giffen of the New England Forestry Foundation said there are other reasons to be encouraged by the findings.

"We can improve wildlife habitat. We can produce more wood. We can produce higher quality wood. We can increase the returns that landowners see from owning land," Giffen said. "And I see this as potentially a game changer in terms of the kinds of things you can do in a financially beneficial way with forest management in Maine."

The New England Forestry Foundation was recently awarded a $30 million grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to pilot forest management programs that pay forest landowners for carbon storage. Giffen said it's essential for landowners to be compensated because it takes several decades for improved forest practices to pay off.

Where that funding comes from and how it's distributed is something that has yet to be worked out.

The study was commissioned by the Forest Carbon for Commercial Landowners Initiative, a group of conservationists, scientists and commercial landowners who want to better understand the carbon storage potential of the Maine woods.

https://www.mainepublic.org/climate/2023-03-06/maine-woods-could-st...

************************************* 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views: 119

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Dan McKay on March 9, 2023 at 5:45am
Massachusetts is offered a helping hand in relocating natural gas production to Maine:
LD 698
PROPOSED SPONSOR AMENDMENT
Offered by Rep. Foster

"This amendment replaces the bill. It requires the Public Utilities Commission to work with technically and financially capable entities to build or expand interstate natural gas infrastructure to or through the state, including but not limited to natural gas derived from renewable sources and liquified natural gas."

Comment by Dan McKay on March 9, 2023 at 5:14am

    Massachusetts elites are forcing natural gas-fired resources out of their state into states like Maine because we are "privileged" with vast "carbon sinks"

     Maine, before the wind/solar" rush produced 13,503 963 (2002 annual output) megawatt hours of gas-fired electricity, more than the 11,000,000-megawatt hours Maine consumes annually. 

    Maine has doubled gas-fired output since 2019 when production hit the low of 1,904,202 megawatt hours. 

Massachusetts and Connecticut will follow to assign Maine the title of "Where Carbon Goes to Die"   

      ISO-NE will provide no cover for this geographic carbon shift.

      Chasing Carbon Zero is Futile. 

    

Comment by Willem Post on March 8, 2023 at 3:21pm

At present, almost tree harvesting is by clear cutting, which a raping of the forest.

Selective cutting of dead, standing trees would enable other trees to sequester more carbon per acre, but that kind of cutting is not profitable 

The first thing is to outlaw all clear cutting. Then use well developed forestry practices that are conservative oriented.

Remember, old trees say 100 years, sequester more carbon per acre than young trees

Comment by Richard McDonald/Saving Maine on March 8, 2023 at 10:56am

Carbon offsets are lucrative. The Passamaquoddy tribe received 10's of millions of dollars in offsets in the past two years. The Downeast Lake Land Trust received $4-6 million as well.  Climate change is a profitable business folks.  

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service