By
Kate Cough
March 21, 2025
Much of a legislative conversation centered around to what extent the state should be investing in emerging technologies.
A few months ago, I was walking my dogs and listening to an episode of Volts, a podcast and newsletter about clean energy and politics from former Grist and Vox writer David Roberts. The episode was an interview with Jigar Shah, who, until very recently, served as the director of the Loan Programs Office in the US Department of Energy.
Roberts opened the conversation by saying “So, we are here to talk about everyone’s favorite subject: nuclear power — upon which everyone has calm and reasoned and fully, empirically backed opinions.” Shah interrupted, pointing out that “The easiest way to trigger people is just to say the word ‘nuclear’.”
This resonated with me. I’ve never gotten as many emails as the few times I’ve written about nuclear power, which, while it’s enjoying somewhat of a renaissance, remains perhaps the most divisive form of energy we’ve ever invented.
Some of those divisions were on display in the Energy, Utility and Technology Committee hearing room earlier over the past two weeks as the committee held public hearings and work sessions on three bills that would advance nuclear power in Maine: L.D. 342, L.D. 343 and L.D. 601.
During the discussion, advocates touted nuclear as a consistent, efficient, carbon-free source of electricity with a small geographic footprint. Opponents worried about cost overruns, waste disposal and the potential for accidents.
Much of the conversation centered around to what extent the state should be investing in emerging technologies.
The first bill, L.D. 342, “An Act to Include Nuclear Power in the State’s Renewable Portfolio Standard,” would be the most impactful were it to pass, and would allow nuclear reactors built after Jan. 1, 2025 to be considered renewable energy in Maine. The legislation would allow such reactors to count toward the state’s goal of getting to 80 percent renewable energy by 2030 and 100 percent by 2050 and to be eligible for the state’s renewable energy credits.
As written, the bill would not apply to the region’s two existing nuclear power plants, in New Hampshire and Connecticut, which generated 23 percent of New England’s power as of January, according to ISO-New England.
The second bill, L.D. 343, “An Act to Direct the Public Utilities Commission to Seek Informational Bids Regarding Small Modular Nuclear Reactors in the State,” directs the Maine PUC to solicit annual informational bids for the establishment of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) under 350 megawatts.
SMRs are an emerging technology that proponents say...........................................
Continue reading at https://themainemonitor.org/maine-new-nuclear-energy/
*************************************
Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Comment
Rep. Reagan Paul (R-Winterport), the bill’s sponsor, argued that “wind and solar have been heavily subsidized for years,” and that the state needs to consider whether it should keep “propping up technologies that can’t provide reliable baseload power.”
My comment: Why the hell are we still subsidizing wind and solar with RECs. There are some projects that have sucked off the ratepayers for 15 years. Ridiculous.
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine