Maine DEP Public Meeting On Proposed First Wind Hancock Wind Project - THURSDAY 6PM-9PM

Maine Government News

Back to current news.

Maine Department of Environmental Protection To Hold Second Public Meeting On Proposed 18-Turbine Hancock Wind Project

May 31, 2013
Environmental Protection

Chris Swain, Maine DEP Director of Innovation and Assistance, 207-287-7831

-The meeting is the second of two DEP is hosting to inform the public and invite comment on an 18-turbine wind farm being proposed in Hancock County by First Wind-

AURORA – The Maine Department of Environmental Protection will host a public meeting on Thursday, June 6 to get feedback on its draft analysis regarding an 18-turbine wind farm proposed in Hancock County.

The meeting on First Wind’s Hancock Wind proposal will be held from 6 to 9 p.m. at the Airline Community School at 26 Great Pond Road in Aurora. Several DEP representatives will attend, including Commissioner Patricia Aho, project manager Maria Eggett, as well as DEP’s noise and visual consultants involved with the agency’s review of the project’s Site Law and Natural Resources Protection Act permit applications.

While this is the second public meeting on the project, it’s the second time the DEP has held two public meetings on an application to the agency as part of an internal review process established by Commissioner Aho in 2011 that requires two public meetings be held on all proposed grid scale wind power projects in Maine.

Developed to ensure adequate opportunity for public comment and a transparent, inclusive review of often controversial wind power projects, the new process also requires the presence of the DEP’s Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner at that second meeting to hear the public’s comments on DEP’s draft analysis, which for the Hancock proposal is available at http://www.maine.gov/dep/land/sitelaw/selected-developments/index.html

DEP will take the comments voiced at the second public meeting into consideration as its review moves forward before a final decision is issued this summer.

First Wind is proposing to begin construction this year on the 54-megawatt wind power generation facility on Schoppe Ridge in T22 MD and an unnamed ridge in T16 MD with an operations and maintenance building in Aurora. In addition to the 512-foot tall turbines, the project includes up to five 344-foot meteorological towers.

The power generated would flow to an expanded substation at the company’s nearby 19-turbine Bull Hill Wind Project.

For more information about the proposed Hancock Wind project and DEP’s review, please contact DEP project manager Maria Eggett at hancockwindproject.dep@maine.gov or go to http://www.maine.gov/dep/ftp/WindPowerProjectFiles/HancockWind/ to view the application and related documents.

http://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/index.php?topic=Portal+News&...

Views: 571

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Donna Amrita Davidge on June 7, 2013 at 10:52am

when you listen to a journalist like this Brit on this site really scarey way of thinking..at least one project is not going ahead in Scotland but plenty of other pristine places like Maine there are being ruined as well..this is global and economists have only one thing in their head .. money signs..

http://www.rechargenews.com/wind/europe_africa/article1329397.ece

Comment by Donna Amrita Davidge on June 7, 2013 at 10:38am

Gary- glad you are there to respond..you are such an excellent resource for someone like Darren, who sounds as savvy and informed as you- the wind companies lie globally and definitely do not care about people..or I would say about global warming either..http://globalwindenergyimpact.com

Comment by Gary Campbell on June 7, 2013 at 10:23am

Remember when, during the Bull Hill LURC hearing when First Wind accidentally leaked that Bull Hill is only Phase One of a two-phase project? First Wind's attorney stated repeatedly under oath that First Wind had no plans for a  Phase II. Well surprise! When Hancock project was first announced even First Wind referred to it as Bull Hill Phase II. Then they quickly changed the name to Hancock.

WAKE UP MAINE! You are being played as a patsy! Why was there no letter campaign demanding a hearing on Hancock? Three keys to fighting these projects are 1) advance notice and no procrastination, 2) demand a hearing and 2) if you get a hearing, become an Intervenor.

Comment by alice mckay barnett on June 7, 2013 at 9:51am

DEP getting feed back?   Commissioner Aho is the first DEP member to listen to us.   Do the meets mean anything?  Probably, when you have hundreds show up like in Passadumkeag.  These small towns are poor and bribes probably will work.  Sometimes we feel so all alone.

Comment by Donna Amrita Davidge on June 7, 2013 at 8:48am

Dear Darren: I am so sorry when there are so many opposing First Wind that none of us were able to be there to support you- I had a similar experience at the Oakfield TIF meeting tho David and Gary and Mike showed up to support us..80 of the 100 people attending voted it in based on money along- they are wolves in sheeps clothing and you are the one on the right side- the Bowers Project had more opposing than for in their 2 days of public hearings as you may know tho it was close- it sounds like you have done your homework- going forward what can wind warriors, if anything, do for you?

Comment by Martha thacker on June 7, 2013 at 7:06am

Darren,

I am so sorry that you had to experience being in a room full of wolves.Wish you could have some sort of cleansing like the Native Americans do. By the time we had meetings for Stetson Mt windfarm, there were  a few in our area who knew how deceptive First Wind reps. were. Some came from Mars Hill..and of course now they have been paid off and are not allowed to tell the truth. Maine govt. should be aware of that . The economy is the only thing that will stop the destruction. Bribery is the only way they can sway Mainers in our govt. When the money runs out for that, there will be no reason for the useless monstrocities called wind farms. And the baldaci gang will say, we had no idea.

Comment by Darren Lord on June 6, 2013 at 9:00pm

I was a little disappointed that I was the only one who showed up at the meeting to challenge First Wind for the Hancock Wind Project.  Everyone at the meeting was pro First Wind because they stand to gain financially from the project.  I was in a room full of wolves who were in full support of the wind project.  I could have used some help from the membership and yet no one showed up.  Simply posting articles isn't going to stop these projects.  You actually have to show up and challenge them at these public meetings. 

Darren

Comment by Martha thacker on June 5, 2013 at 9:45am

Darren

The sale of Stetson Mt windfarm is old news. At the time, years ago, right after Stetson was built, it was said that Credit Suisse bought Stetson. I think ..no facts included..just my idea ..is that first wind was broke, could not make their payments..and Stetson was offered. As far as I know there were no takers. Credit Suisse must have held the note. You can google sale of Stetson to Credit Suisse. I only got one link. Others , I am sure , know more about it.Could try Stetson Mt foreclosure etc. , I have to plant my garden today.

Comment by Mike DiCenso on June 4, 2013 at 8:22pm

I am sending in written comments in protest. SRSNS deserve protection. If the state doesn't save these places, why save anything else?  I suspect if these accursed wind companies fill the expedited areas of the state they will move on to the North Woods and state parks next. They do not care that they are ruining the quality of place here in Maine. 

Comment by Darren Lord on June 3, 2013 at 8:01pm

If you find out that the Stetson Mt. Project is up for sale, I would be more than happy to raise it to the DEP's attention at the meeting on Thursday as another reason to send First Wind back to Boston where they belong.

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service