Maine BEP wrestles with fees for solar, wind impacts

By Kate Cough
November 1, 2024

Northern and downeast Maine should be excluded from aspects of rules intended to protect large undeveloped tracts of land from the development of solar, wind and high-impact transmission lines, members of the Board of Environmental Protection recommended at a meeting earlier this month.

The rules are part of new fee programs being developed by the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry that would require certain large-scale energy projects to pay for impacts to high-value habitat or large swaths of undeveloped land in an effort to direct development away from those areas.

“I’m not sure we gain anything by defining large, undeveloped habitat blocks — for this purpose, for the purpose of renewable energy — when the likelihood of, you know, tens of miles of transmission lines going into some of these places seems very remote to me,” said board member Robert Marvinney.

“I’m more concerned about how we approach this in southern and central Maine, where more of the pressure is for this kind of development.”

In directing DEP staff to remove northern and downeast Maine from part of the proposal, board members also reasoned that the state already has mechanisms in place to compensate for impacts, such as for alteration to wetlands under its in-lieu fee compensation program.

Central Maine Power paid more than $2.5 million under that program as part of its development of the New England Clean Energy Connect project; large solar projects have paid fees in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to state data.

A number of large landowners and renewable energy developers have pushed back against the changes proposed by DEP. Solar developers argued that the additional fees could make developing utility-scale solar in Maine “almost impossible” while large landowners say they were blindsided by the proposal and that the changes penalize forest owners who have been responsibly maintaining their lands.

“When we account for the compounding effect of the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry’s (“DACF”) parallel rulemaking, it is hard to see a future for utility-scale solar in Maine,” wrote Robert Cleaves of Dirigo Solar in comments to the board.

Most new utility-scale projects will be large enough to require compensation under the new rules, Cleaves wrote, and the fees “are likely prohibitive to solar projects.” The protected areas account for nearly 80 percent of the forested land in Maine, Cleaves wrote.

“Ultimately, identifying feasible sites near remaining interconnection capacity that do not impact these areas will be very challenging, if not impossible.”

York County landowner Nathaniel Sewell said the proposal penalizes landowners who manage forestland “for the generations of hard work and sacrifice that have gone into preserving and adding to their land.”

Continue reading at https://themainemonitor.org/bep-impact-fees/

************************************ 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views: 28

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Willem Post on November 4, 2024 at 7:34am

To screw the people to feather its nest, and disperse Bennie’s to get votes, as needed, although cheating is a lot less costly.

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on November 3, 2024 at 6:33pm

Pentagon Blasted for Failing to Send Absentee Ballots to Active Military Service Members in Time For Election
https://www.infowars.com/posts/republican-lawmakers-blast-pentagon-...

Comment by Dan McKay on November 3, 2024 at 7:48am

The government had to tweak their formula for proving their stupidity from President Reagan's observation " If it moves, tax it, if it keeps moving, regulate it, and if it stops moving, subsidize it" to "If subsidizing moves it, regulate it, and if it keeps moving, tax it."

No matter the sequence of actions, government always proves it will screw the people.   

Comment by Willem Post on November 3, 2024 at 6:50am

More than 50% of the cost per kWh is paid by federal and state subsidies, grants, and various taxation rules specially tailored for tax shelters, per Wall Street standard practice.

The solar systems should be located close to where the electricity is used, and where grid is already in place.

Trees remove CO2, and cool earth surfaces, therefore they should be protected, not be clear cut for solar and wind and grid development.

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service