It's time to dig this up again. Watch my right hand - - - there is nothing to see in my left!

It is really not important that this is a political issue and whether you support Biden or Trump . . . . It is an issue of real science vs. pseudo-science developed by international economists to control the economic imbalance of the world. It is a New World Order plan to transfer wealth, not improve the climate or save the world from "Climate Change" which is an undefinable quantity. They knew this when it was developed and have continued to deny their own facts with the help of a complicit media and phony scientists. This has been admitted to by the founders of the IPCC several times but has never been taken up by the main stream media and the NWO leaders that are traditionally on the left, but included The Bush's. We have had four decades of brainwashing and fear that our world was going to come to an end and the only way out was to cripple the USA and fossil fuel energy.

Here are a few quotes from the top.

  1. "The former co-chair of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015, Ottmar Edenhofer let slip that, “One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole. We redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy.”"

From Wikipedia:

Edenhofer completed his Diploma in Economics at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich. Edenhofer says that his interest in philosophy and economics was influenced by his readings of the works of Henry GeorgeKarl MarxMax WeberLudwig Wittgenstein, and John Dewey, all Marxist, Socialist or Progressive economists and philosophers, NOT climate scientists.

  1. At a news conference in Brussels in 2015, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism. She is an Anthropologist and Diplomat, not a climate scientist. Her Husband was former head of the World Bank’s sustainable development unit.

"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reining for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution," she said.
Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: "This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history."

The only economic model in the last 150 years that has ever worked at all is capitalism. The evidence is prima facie: From a feudal order that lasted a thousand years, produced zero growth and kept workdays long and lifespans short, the countries that have embraced free-market capitalism have enjoyed a system in which output has increased 70-fold, work days have been halved and lifespans doubled.
Figueres is perhaps the perfect person for the job of transforming "the economic development model" because she's really never seen it work. "If you look at Ms. Figueres' Wikipedia page," notes Cato economist Dan Mitchell: Making the world look at their right hand while they choke developed economies with their left.

They have denounced the best energy, nuclear, even though it is probably the cheapest and safest. They have denounced the next safest and cheapest, hydro, as being detrimental to the environment. They have taken out "Fracking" as being dangerous in spite of the fact that it is 15,000 feet below any known water table. They have pronounced that vehicles can be propelled cleanly by electricity neglecting to tell you that they cannot travel long distances, would have to be charged from an electric grid that is already overstressed, and would be more so without nuclear, hydro, gas and coal.

This is NOT a political fight but a fight for the viability of our future both economically and physically. The only leaders that can make this happen are NOT those proposing some fantasy of "The Green New Deal" or climate change. The climate has been changing for 4½ BILLION years and has been a LOT warmer and a LOT colder than it is now. All you have to do is look at the predictions they have made since the 70's where they first called for a new "Ice Age" then when they realized that was a loser to move to "Global Warming" and when that failed moved to "Climate Change", an amorphic label that really can NOT be proved. 

We finally have had some "politicians" that have pushed back on this and have withdrawn from the NWO. They realize the phoniness of the fabricated data and are willing to explore new roads to energy success. We only have to wait for rates to increase for electricity, heating fuel, gasoline, diesel fuel, transportation, etc, to be able to fight back and get to where we have been for the last four years.   


Views: 276


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Jim Lutz on January 28, 2021 at 11:31am

Sherwin . . . as I said, ice cores are a snapshot of history, a history of millions of years. Of course for most of those years there was no evidence of things we contend with today, but in those days we lived in caves. at least I have no intention of returning to the stone age nor do most of those others I know.

Comment by Jim Lutz on January 28, 2021 at 11:12am

Sherwin . . . you are a scientist . . . ice cores are a snapshot of the past, not a full history. We are talking about CO2 here. CO2 is at roughly 400 parts per MILLION of our atmosphere. When this whole "Global Warming" thing started it was about 320 parts per MILLION. During the history of the world it has been as high as 2000 parts per million and as low as 100 parts per million. This is a MINUSCULE portion of our atmosphere and the increase we have seen, or WILL see is even MORE minuscule. While your ilk has convinced our children that CO2 is POISON and will kill us, it is a NECESSARY ingredient in our existence, and small increases are actually helpful to the environment, making plants grow better and faster. This use of CO2 as a foil for the climate change crew was chosen because it can not be proven one way or the other. You are a scientist. Climate Change is a theory and has to be tested, analyzed, tested, analyzed, over and over. It has NOT been. There is data on both sides yet the IPCC and political drivers of "Climate Change" ignore any other research and marginalize it. That is NOT science.  

Comment by Sherwin Start on January 28, 2021 at 10:39am

To finish my comment- THe results of our CORE samples that we took of the LAYERED Ice Sheets- shows unequivelly- THAT there has NOT Been and  POLLUTION of the type that man has & is producing for at least 10-25 thousand years!

ALL NATIONS- WORLDWIDE  MUST GET ON THE PROVERBIAL  BANDWAGON and do whatever it takes to stop the MAN-MADE Pollution of our Land, Water & AIR !!

Sherwin Start PhD.

Comment by Sherwin Start on January 28, 2021 at 10:33am

Very Good Jim - But I might add-  It does not make one iota difference if you belong to the NWO or any other Order- THE FACT REMAINS - MAN IS DESTROYING this EARTHS ECOSYSTEM By pumping out trillions of tons of  POLLUTANTS every year! Yes, I have I worked many Geo-Physical Scientists all over the World. This PLANET has indeed gone thru  MANY  Heating & cooling cycles over the millions of years- BUT 

The Geologists I have worked hand to hand with  HAVE NEVER  found ANY Pollutants in ANY Of the  Stratified Layers of this Earths Crust- NEVER! I Have worked with Glaciologists All over North America

Comment by Penny Gray on January 28, 2021 at 10:28am

If for some reason real science and common sense do not prevail, we're looking at "Soylent Green" and "Agenda 21".  Not comforting.  As energy prices soar and the repercussions from the global shutdown drag on, the economic strain might swing the pendulum toward energy success.  It's either that or starvation.  The business failures and unemployment numbers are no joke.


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.”

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service