Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

In Blow to Climate Activists, New Jersey Lawsuit Against Oil Companies Dismissed With Prejudice

Environmental activists’ strategy of punishing fossil fuel companies at the local level suffers another defeat.

A coal-fired power plant in 2021 at Craig, Colorado. AP/Rick Bowmer, file

BRADLEY CORTRIGHTPublished: Feb. 7, 2025 03:47 AM ETUpdated: Feb. 7, 2025 06:43 AM ET

The attempt to punish fossil fuel companies for what environmental activists say is their role in fueling climate change is facing another setback after a judge in New Jersey dismissed a lawsuit against five fossil fuel companies with prejudice.

New Jersey’s attorney general, Matthew Platkin, filed a lawsuit against Chevron, Exxon Mobil, BP, ConocoPhillips, Shell, as well as the American Petroleum Institute, in 2022 for allegedly “systematically” hiding information that proved their industry had a role in climate change.

However, a state superior judge, Douglas Hurd, dismissed the case with prejudice Wednesday, saying the state could not seek damages for emissions that occurred throughout the country and the world.

“Only federal law can govern Plaintiffs’ interstate and international emissions claims because ‘the basic scheme of the Constitution so demands,’” Judge Hurd wrote. “Therefore, Plaintiffs’ complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim.”

His decision likely means that the case cannot be re-opened unless the state successfully appeals it.

In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Platkin’s office said, “We are disappointed in today’s decision, which allows some of the country’s most powerful companies to escape accountability for hiding the truth and misleading New Jerseyans about the role their products play in causing climate change.

“The trial court’s decision is wrong, and inconsistent with decisions in other states, and we are appealing immediately. We will not let companies get away with putting profit above public safety,” the spokesman added.

The defeat for New Jersey is the latest setback for environmental activists who have been urging state and local governments to take the fossil fuel industry to court in the name of curbing climate change.

The general counsel at the Center for Climate Integrity, Alyssa Johl, told New Jersey Spotlight News that Judge Hurd’s “analysis of this case is flawed.

“This case is about holding Big Oil companies accountable for deceiving the people of New Jersey about the dangers of fossil fuels — it is not seeking to solve global climate change,” she added.

An attorney for Chevron, Theodore Boutros, said in a statement, “The New Jersey Superior Court’s decision joins the growing and nearly unanimous consensus among both federal and state courts across the country.

“These types of claims are precluded and preempted by federal law and must be dismissed,” Mr. Boutros said.

There have been dozens of similar cases filed against the fossil fuel industry at the local level. None have made it to trial.

In January, a circuit court judge in Maryland, Judge Steven Platt, dismissed lawsuits filed by the city of Annapolis and Anne Arundel County against more than two dozen fossil fuel companies.

Judge Platt said he was “persuaded” by the reasoning of a circuit court judge at Baltimore in a previous case that found that “global pollution-based complaints were never intended by Congress to be handled by individual states.”

While New Jersey’s lawsuit has been dismissed, several lawsuits from other states and cities are still pending. A left-wing law firm based in California, Sher Edling, has filed more than 20 similar lawsuits against the fossil fuel industry on behalf of cities and states such as Delaware, Rhode Island, California, and Chicago.

A 2024 congressional report found that the firm has received “substantial assistance” from left-wing “third parties.” It noted, “Left-wing funds’ tax returns indicated that they gave Sher Edling millions of dollars in relation to the climate nuisance cases.”

Although New Jersey is not listed on Sher Edling’s list of cases that it filed, the decision by Judge Hurd is another blow against environmental activists’ strategy of seeking hefty sums in damages from the fossil fuel industry even in traditionally blue states.

BRADLEY CORTRIGHT

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on February 7, 2025 at 11:06am: Musk Says His DOGE Team Uncovered $100 BILLION in Medicare and Medicaid Waste After Gaining Access to the System
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/breaking-musk-exposes-shoc...

Comment by Willem Post on February 7, 2025 at 10:41am: Give them hell, Arthur

RSS

Welcome to
Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Sign Up
or Sign In

U.S. Sen Angus King

THE UNTOLD STORY OF RECORD HILL WIND

The Untold Story of Record Hill Wind, continued

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

-- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

Badges | Report an Issue | Terms of Service