IF GERMANY HAD KEPT ITS NUCLEAR POWER, IT WOULD HAVE SAVED $600 BILLION AND REDUCED EMISSIONS BY 73%

.

Germany already had nuclear power in 2002, if they just kept it and didn’t build all the wind and solar plants, they wouldn’t have had to spend $800 BILLION on subsidies, and would have cut their emissions by 73% more.

.

If ever there is a statistic that says there is something rotten in the State of Climate Panic, this is surely it.

I mean, does CO2 matter or doesn’t it?

Do the Greens care at all, or even a bit?

If there was a climate emergency and The Greens were worried about CO2, they might have protested that the Energiewende was a reckless experiment.

But, if the Greens were tools for communists, foreign states, or banker-investors, then they might keep choosing options that benefit other countries, help Bankers or just make Big Government bigger.

Either the German Greens have utterly failed at the very task they set out to do, or they were really aiming at something else.

Ross Pomery writes at RealClearScience and  WattsUpWithThat

.

In 2002, Germany launched an ambitious plan to transition to renewable energy.

“Die Energiewende” initiated a massive expansion of solar and wind power, resulting in a commendable 25 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2022…

In 2002, nuclear power supplied about 20% of Germany’s electricity.

In 2023, it supplied none.

A layperson might think that cheap wind and solar could simply fill the gap, but it isn’t so simple.

.

Jan Emblemsvåg, a Professor of Civil Engineering at Norway’s NTNU just published a study comparing the ambitious German Energiewende renewable program with nuclear power:

“what if Germany had spent their money on nuclear power and not followed their policy from 2002 through 2022 (20 years); would Germany have achieved more emission reductions and lower expenses?”

Even German bureaucrats admit Energiewende “poses a threat to the German economy”

.

German Federal Accounting Office (Bundesrechnungshof) writes about the German policy dubbed ‘Die Energiewende’ in German, and it concludes:

‘The Bundesrechnungshof warns,  the energy, transition in its current form, poses a threat to the German economy and overburdens the financial capacity of electricity-consuming companies and households’ (Bundesrechnungshof Citation2021a).

A whole lot of wind (green) and solar (orange) power were added to the German grid and it was worse than useless:

.

Given these results, there can be no doubt whatsoever, if Germany had invested in Nuclear Power Plants, instead of wind and solar, Germany would have decarbonized more, with far less expenditures.

The short conclusion: Germany would have reached its climate goals with a substantial margin at HALF the expenditures of Energiewende.

The Germans have done this experiment so we don’t have to

NOTE: Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York State, etc., should immediately abandon wind and solar and build nuclear plants

.

.

These costs do not include:

1) The added burden of expensive electricity on the well-being of businesses and homes,

2) The opportunity costs of money that could have been spent more productively elsewhere,

3) The loss of talent, brains and industry to other countries.

Building new nuclear plants was still cheaper than wind and solar

.

The paper goes through another scenario, where more nuclear plants were built with careful estimations of the costs and long times to construct plants and still concludes that the Germans would have saved $400 BILLION

.

.

Impact on Germany's Business

.

Not coincidentally, in 2024, Germany has some of the most expensive electricity in Europe, business confidence is low  

VOLKSWAGEN have just announced that after 87 years in production, they might have to close their German factories.

Volkswagen, founded in 1937, said on Monday, it could no longer rule out unprecedented plant closures in Germany as it seeks ways to save several $billion.

Chief executive Oliver Blume said: “The economic environment has become even tougher and new players are pushing into Europe. Germany as a business location is falling further behind in terms of competitiveness.”

Volkswagen employs around 650,000 workers globally, almost 300,000 of whom, MOSTLY HIGH-PAYING, HIGH-TECH JOBS, are in Germany, and the threat of factory closures sparked an immediate fierce backlash …

REFERENCE

Emblemsvåg, J. (2024). What if Germany had invested in nuclear power? A comparison between the German energy policy the last 20 years and an alternative policy of investing in nuclear power. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2024.2355642