High-stakes pipeline talks could send Maine natural gas prices soaring
by Billy Kobin
September 4, 2024
Three interstate natural gas pipelines serving Maine are seeking rate increases that could lead to higher energy prices in the state.
The pending requests are months away from either getting approved or denied but come as regulators and lawmakers grapple with helping Mainers facing the nation’s 10th highest average electricity prices and newer fees from solar subsidies.
Though Maine’s climate goals seek 80 percent renewable energy generation by 2030, natural gas remains a key source for the state and generates more than half of New England’s power. Maine, with nearly 1.4 million residents, uses less energy and natural gas than most states but has the country’s 12th-highest average residential natural gas prices at $21.63 per thousand cubic feet, per federal data.
Three interstate pipelines — Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, Algonquin Gas Transmission and Granite State Gas Transmission — that serve companies in Maine and large electricity generators in New England want to increase rates. If federal regulators approve the requests, then retail electric and natural gas prices will also rise, according to Maine Public Advocate William Harwood’s office, which is participating in the complicated negotiations.............................
Article continues at https://www.bangordailynews.com/2024/09/04/politics/state-politics/...
*************************************
Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Views: 25
Comment
-
Comment by Dan McKay on September 7, 2024 at 7:28am
-
The big story is Massachusetts is attempting to ban natural gas and Massachusetts controls ISO-NE.
Massachusetts Just Took a Big Step Away from Natural Gas. Which States Might Follow?
A first-in-the-country ruling sets Massachusetts on a path toward electrification of heating, and could lead regulators in other states to follow suit.
Natural gas may be on the way out in Massachusetts.
State utility regulators on Wednesday issued a sweeping ruling that sets a framework for reducing the use of gas for heating as part of a larger strategy to address climate change.
The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities rejected arguments from utilities and the gas industry that had urged the use of “renewable natural gas” and hydrogen as lower-carbon alternatives to natural gas. Instead, the department ruled that the state should encourage a transition to using electricity for heating and other functions gas currently serves.
Massachusetts is the first state to take such a clear step to phase out natural gas, but it likely won’t be the last. At least 11 other states (California, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island and Washington) as well as Washington, D.C., have ongoing regulatory cases that are exploring the future of natural gas.
Explore the latest news about what’s at stake for the climate during this election season.
Environmental and clean energy advocates view the ruling as a victory and, they hope, the beginning of a broader shift away from gas. For gas utilities and their industry groups, the decision is a major defeat.
“As far as I know this is the first time a utility has been required to decarbonize,” said Matt Rusteika, director of market transformation for the Building Decarbonization Coalition, a group that includes clean energy companies and unions, among others. “So it’s a big deal. To take a step so clear and so deliberate is truly a first.”
One thing all sides agreed about is that a shift away from natural gas will have costs that could disproportionately affect low-income consumers who are unable to pay to convert their homes to electric heat or other alternatives. The ruling acknowledges the potential harm and has said the department will begin a separate proceeding to monitor and reduce the energy cost burden.
Natural gas is the heating fuel for 1.4 million, or 51 percent, of Massachusetts households, according to the Census Bureau, so a transition away from it is a significant change. The other leading fuel sources are kerosene or fuel oil, heating 24 percent of households, and electricity, which fuels 18 percent of homes. The state now says that it will encourage a shift to electricity, while also implementing energy conservation measures.
Under the ruling, gas utilities will need to submit climate compliance plans every five years starting in 2025, outlining how they intend to make a transition to clean energy.
The ruling says gas utilities are required to consider non-gas alternatives to gas expansion projects. Companies will no longer be able to make consumers pay for programs that promote the use of natural gas.
The alternatives could include electrification, geothermal heat and programs that reduce energy use.
The larger goal is for Massachusetts to be on track to meet its previously adopted goal of net-zero emissions by 2050.
Clean Energy Advocates Celebrate
The decision is a victory for clean energy advocacy groups that had recommended an approach similar to what the department is now requiring.
Caitlin Peale Sloan, Massachusetts vice president at the Conservation Law Foundation, said the department’s actions show an embrace of the reality of what’s needed and a rejection of options put forth by the gas industry that were not practical.
She credits Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, a Democrat who took office this year whose appointees to the Department of Public Utilities steered the process.
Healey’s willingness to embrace electrification is in contrast to her predecessor, Charlie Baker, a Republican, who was much more cautious about making changes that would affect home heating.
“It really is a matter of the times changing, the climate science becoming clearer and now a governor appointing commissioners with a reality-based lens,” Sloan said.
The decision “has the potential to be one of the most transformative decisions in Massachusetts climate history,” said a statement from Kyle Murray, director of state program implementation at Acadia Center, a Maine-based environmental advocacy group.
A Bad Day for the Gas Industry
Companies involved in the natural gas economy had urged the department to allow for the use of alternatives such as hydrogen and renewable natural gas, a form of methane made from feedstocks that include waste from landfills and livestock manure.
“Our industry stands ready to deploy renewable gas technologies which will reduce methane emissions, displace fossil fuel supply, improve organic waste management, produce useful soil amendments, and ultimately sequester carbon in Massachusetts,” said an Oct. 14 filing from the Renewable Natural Gas Coalition, a California-based trade group.
A spokesman for the coalition said the ruling “ignores emissions data and climate strategies upholding RNG’s importance as a gas decarbonization tool.” He added that a diverse portfolio of resources will be needed and “the future is not electric versus renewable gas.”
Eversource, a utility company with subsidiaries that provide electricity and gas in Massachusetts, proposed a plan with a series of initiatives to reduce emissions from gas. The throughline was a continuing use of the gas distribution system, with various projects to explore alternatives that would include hydrogen, renewable natural gas, geothermal energy and the deployment of hybrid systems that could run on electricity and natural gas.
Critics of Eversource’s plan argued that renewable natural gas and hydrogen may be important resources for reducing emissions in heavy industry and other parts of the economy, but are not well-suited to replacing gas for home heating.
“Reliance on these alternative gasses is illogical and counterproductive, and the analysis supporting them in this docket is inconsistent with reality,” said Ezra Hausman, who runs an energy policy consultancy in the Boston area, in testimony submitted in October. (He specified that he was speaking on his own behalf as a scientist, and not for a client.)
He said gas companies are engaging in “magical thinking” when they say that renewable natural gas and hydrogen can replace natural gas.
The department rejected most of the utilities’ suggestions, with some of the only agreement coming on the idea that the companies should explore greater use of geothermal energy.
Asked for a response to the department’s decision, an Eversource spokesman sent this statement: “We are working every day to help the commonwealth achieve its nation-leading decarbonization goals and we remain fully engaged with other utilities and stakeholders to define a practical path forward to reach them. We are currently reviewing the order and are thankful to the Department of Public Utilities for bringing together all stakeholders in an open and transparent process.”
This story is funded by readers like you.
Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.
Donate NowConsumer Costs to Be Scrutinized
As Massachusetts moves away from gas, some customers won’t be able to afford to switch to other fuels.
Testimony in the case acknowledged this concern, but the ruling doesn’t offer a solution other than a commitment to open an additional case to explore the issue.
The National Consumer Law Center participated in the case, and its attorney, Jenifer Bosco, said she is pleased that the department is taking the cost concerns seriously.
“Low-income consumers already experience high energy burdens, paying a higher percentage of their household income for home energy costs than their neighbors pay,” she said in an email. “Without a focus on affordability, low-income consumers could be left stranded on an increasingly unaffordable gas system, bearing more than their share of the cost to keep the system operating.”
Her group was critical of utility proposals for hydrogen because of the potential for high costs that consumers would be forced to pay.
Will Other States Follow?
For clean energy advocates, one of the most exciting aspects of the Massachusetts ruling is the possibility that regulators in other states may follow suit.
Illinois was the most recent state to initiate a probe into the future of gas, which the Illinois Commerce Commission did alongside a ruling in November that rejected a rate increase for the gas utility Ameren.
“As the state embarks on a journey toward a 100 percent clean energy economy, the gas system’s operations will not continue to exist in its current form,” said Doug Scott, the commission chairman, in a statement. “Identifying how our gas and electric systems can adapt to meet these goals, and what specific actions should be taken to achieve them, will be an important task for the commission moving forward.”
The Building Decarbonization Coalition is tracking the cases across the country, and provided the list of states earlier in this story. Rusteika said his hope is that other states take a close look at how Massachusetts reviewed the evidence and came to its conclusions.
“This order sets a strong precedent that (regulators are) going to stop skirting the science and start asking the hard questions,” he said.
But he emphasized that the Massachusetts ruling was just one step, and that implementing it will be a long and complex process.
“We paused just enough time to high five, but we’re back in it today,” he said.
-
-
Carbon Allowances are a direct tax on natural gas plant production and become a part of production prices in the wholesale market and carry over into retail prices. Notice how these prices per allowance are increasing dramatically. Auctions are held every three months.
-
-
Fracking bans are not necessary because natural gas will be banned and/or made extraordinary expensive. The "Dark Ages" are about to return as insanity grows in America
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2024 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine