Germany's "Skills Shortage" Scam: Open Borders, Job Losses, and Economic Collapse
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/germany-s-skills-short...
By Thomas Kolbe
.
The ideology of open external borders has become a core element of Brussels policymaking. When Angela Merkel extended her 2015 invitation to millions of mostly poor, unskilled Syrians, it merely confirmed a Brussels policy embedded for years. The claim that this had anything to do with combating the “skills shortage” was fiction.
Germany’s economy is now in free fall. Three years of negative growth.
Years of overregulation, crushing fiscal burdens, and a self-inflicted energy crisis have scarred the labor market deeply. Since 2019, roughly 700,000 jobs have vanished in the private sector.
During the same period, the government itself added 500,000 public sector jobs. That means, by the end of 2024, 700,000 fewer private sector workers have to support 500,000 additional bureaucrats, who justify their existence by issuing and enforcing more damaging rules and regulations. This is the reverse of Making Germany Great Again
In 2025, another 100,000 private sector job cuts are looming—an alarming verdict on Berlin’s socialist-style, centrally planned economic course.
It is also the logical result of believing, a subsidy-driven “Green Transition/ENERGIEWENDE” (wind/solar/heat pumps, EVs) can substitute for a private economy shaped by capital markets, competition, and innovation.
.
This decline is structural. Since 2018, productivity has been sliding, year after year.
The German growth model has broken.
In 2024, €64.5 billion in net direct investment left the country, much of it flowing to the United States, where re-industrialization, deregulation, and energy abundance make the business climate much more attractive. Germany, once the world’s export engine, is bleeding capital and know-how.
Investment inside Germany has stalled.
According to official data, the number of job openings in July 2025 fell by almost 11 percent compared to a year before, to just 628,000.
Facing those positions are millions of unemployed, both Germans and migrants.
Two causes stand out: 1) state-run education systematically produces graduates misaligned with the needs of business, and 2) a lavish welfare state discourages individuals from adapting and seeking productive work.
.
The true scale of unemployment is obscured. Hundreds of thousands are hidden in short-time work schemes, “training” programs, or statistical loopholes designed to minimize the numbers. The workers exist. And yet, media and politics never tire of repeating the warning of an acute shortage of skilled labor.
.
Virtually no corporate speech or think-tank study avoids the cliché of missing workers.
The Cologne-based Institute for the German Economy warns of a shortage of over 530,000 skilled workers, claiming competitiveness is “dramatically endangered.”
The state-owned KfW bank calls it “Germany’s biggest economic risk” and predicts “decades of weak growth” without reform.
The official “solution” offered is always the same: open the borders wider, in the hope that somewhere in the tidal wave of migration some suitable candidates might be found.
But the practical recruitment of skilled personnel has always been a core responsibility of management.
No successful company relies on the state to provide qualified applicants.
Instead, they create attractive conditions: competitive salaries, promotion prospects, and opportunities for development.
They scout for talent worldwide, targeting the actual pools of expertise.
They invest in integration and retention, knowing that skilled workers are in global demand.
Proactive firms go to international trade fairs, use specialized recruiters, and place ads in technical media.
They recruit at schools and universities to secure their pipeline.
None of this relies on state-run job agencies, symbolic/expensive/useless “initiatives,” or the influx of unqualified economic migrants.
That German companies remain largely silent about the failures of open-border policy, just as they remain silent about the absurdities of the "Green Transition/ENERGIEWENDE", reveals a malaise in corporatist spirit.
The narrative of “demographics” and “skills shortage” is sustained by two camps.
The first are the naïve idealists, clinging to the belief that Germany’s collapsing demographics can be offset by inflows from Third World impoverished regions.
They remain blind to the cultural consequences of mass Islamization, ignore the reality of social fragmentation, and cite the United States as a model—ignoring that U.S. immigration in the 19th century was overwhelmingly European, culturally compatible, and easily assimilated, due to the absence of a welfare state.
For those idealists, Frontex—the EU’s border guard—is little more than a fig leaf for the abandoned external borders of the Union.
.
The second camp follows a more calculated political strategy.
As in the U.S., mass immigration from impoverished, unstable regions translates into higher vote shares for the Left.
They, too, invoke “demographic collapse” and “skills shortages” as justification, and never mention the voter gain.
With compliant Corporate Media support, they have succeeded in stigmatizing any criticism of open-border policy as fascist or reactionary.
While the United States, under Donald Trump, executed the most radical immigration reversal imaginable—zero tolerance, mass deportations, and enforcements—the European Union drifts toward chaos.
The rise of right-wing parties such as AfD in Germany, Fidesz in Hungary, Fratelli d’Italia under Giorgia Meloni, and Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National in France signals public resistance.
But despite the surge, there is still no credible reversal in EU migration policy, because of election "management" that aims to preserve the disastrous status quo.
.
As long as symbolic gestures—such as a single deportation flight or a brief border check—are enough to calm the press and stabilize polling for the Left (and its so-called “conservative” allies), Brussels bureaucrats keep a tight grip on policy.
.
Meanwhile, the real solutions are being pursued not by governments but by companies: Mittelstand firms, retailers, industrial champions, and family-owned businesses.
They recruit abroad, invest in training, cooperate with schools and universities, and build the pipelines the state has destroyed with its failed education system.
Germany’s labor market is being salvaged not by open-border politics, but by the initiative of the very private sector that politicians continue to undermine.
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine