Expose UN Agenda 21 --Wind Turbines , part of that plan.

“One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole,” said Edenhofer, who co-chaired the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change working group on Mitigation of Climate Change from 2008 to 2015.

So what is the goal of environmental policy?

“We redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy,” said Omar Edenhofer.

Mr. Edenhofer is a UN Climate Official.

Indeed, this is the UN  "Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform", Agenda 21

Setting the stage, remember, the Soviet Union and the Berlin  Wall had fallen; now the world was to improve with the new agenda of "peaceful " central planning as a core,  Agenda 21. As it had been  with the ending  of   all major  wars in the 20th century, post  Cold War  UN action was to be no different. For the good of the world, the wealth of the successful  (winner) nations would be spread to those that were less fortunate(redistributed) to stabilize and   make the world safer and more  peaceful.Consider  NAFTA.

"Fortunate" developing nations would play a key role with NAFTA and Agenda 21. How better to do it than to inflict "guilt " on the successful, and  impose  "Green"  and CO2  as the brainwash modality. Who in their right mind would be against sustainable development and saving the earth for the  less fortunate, and preventing it from literally , going to Hell's  Climate Oven. Elitists could jump on board early and make  literally billions, from Agenda 21. Reduce capitalism and fair markets ,kill fossil fuel influence that produced economic miracles,  increase redistribution ,select energy  Winners from central control authority with a plan...Agenda 21.

Please read and contemplate the place of renewable power  initiatives in central planning from the UN ,Agenda 21.  Contemplate and decide for yourself. Research Agenda 21.

Please think about the "ALGOREithm". There are many sources to chose from. Just a taste of one is below.



The Green Unreality Show

Politicians from 175 countries agree to keep doing whatever they intended to do anyway.


Business World Columnist Holman Jenkins Jr. analyzes the cost and environmental impact of the U.N.’s latest climate-change agreement. Photo credit: Getty Images.

The climate deal negotiated in Paris and signed in New York Friday is not a treaty. It is not enforceable against the U.S. or anybody else. It waves vaguely at the idea of a $100 billion adjustment fund for poorer countries, to be filled in later by somebody else, maybe.

Like all such international agreements, it’s a giant PR exercise designed to put a global imprimatur on what domestic politicians want to do anyway. In China and India, that’s grow their energy output any way they can. In President Obama’s case, it’s continue to dish out green mandates and subsidies that please his entourage.

Economist Bruce Yandle coined the term bootleggers and Baptists for political coalitions of true believers and their more self-interested fellow travelers. The climate movement is the ultimate example.

Having ginned up a climate “crisis” in the first place, it’s almost as if the movement has ginned up a fake victory to keep the game going. This week’s signing was preceded by an outpouring of fishy studies in the press about how renewable energy is on the verge of solving the problem.

The most paradoxical claim, regularly aired in the New York Times, is that the fate of the planet depends on how you vote in the U.S. presidential race because solar power is falling rapidly in cost and is now competitive with fossil fuels.

Well, then it doesn’t matter how you vote. Cheaper solar energy will displace fossil energy for purely economic reasons.

The fragment of truth here is that the cost of solar collectors has come down thanks to Chinese production, but this represents a small fraction of the actual cost of integrating solar into the power system.

Solar is free; the sun does not send us a bill. But solar is only competitive to the extent that fossil-fuel plants remain on hand to provide backup power when the sun is not shining. Unfortunately, fossil-fuel plant economics deteriorate rapidly when plants must stop and start to make up for fluctuating wind and solar.

This is why, for instance, Germany managed to increase its use of renewables and its output of carbon dioxide at the same time—because it resorted to cheap coal to keep the lights on at a price its people could afford.

This is why states like Iowa and Texas, which brag about their wind production, have more stubborn emissions output than do states that simply followed market signals to switch to gas from coal.

A giddy media is full of traps for the unwary. Widely touted earlier this month was a study by United Nations Environment Program claiming that renewables now represent 10% of global electricity production—never mind that more authoritative sources like the International Energy Agency and the U.S. Energy Information Administration put the figure at 7%.

UNEP also claimed that $286 billion was invested in renewables last year, more than twice the investment in new coal and gas plants. This is the Soviet habit of measuring inputs rather than outputs. Consumers get far less power per dollar of renewable investment than they get from fossil-fuel investment.

In truth, the cost of backup power not only caps solar and wind growth, renewables may already have overshot. The International Renewable Energy Agency, in a discordantly sober report, predicts that wind and solar will start shrinking their share in the fast-growing developing economies in coming years.

Now you, dear reader, are properly backgrounded on a fight going on in many U.S. states. The fight concerns the exorbitant costs imposed on other ratepayers to subsidize backup power for solar adopters.

Nevada has been a recent ground zero. A battle there enlisted utility owner Warren Buffett and solar promoter Elon Musk on opposing sides. Eventually utility regulators trimmed back generous prices paid to solar-panel owners who sell excess power back to the local utility.

Curiously, solar fans didn’t applaud. When they can’t sell their excess back to the power company at inflated prices, solar adopters would have greater incentive to invest in a battery to store it for their own use. They no longer would need backup from coal or gas. Solar would become a real competitor with the grid, not just a sinkhole for handouts. And obviated would be any nasty political arguments over how much to pillage innocent ratepayers to make solar viable.

Of course, solar promoters don’t see it this way. They care about their stock prices, not the planet.

The good news is that battery technology will continue to improve, thanks to the proliferation of portable devices in our lives, and so will the economics of grid independence. True climate worrywarts should be grateful for small favors. Whatever the truth of man’s impact on global warming, the outcome will be shaped more by the unregulated evolution of technology than by any master plan from the bureaucracy. Meanwhile, the ecstatic burble accompanying the Paris deal is just another layer of fraudulence of the kind that has become too much mixed in with the climate cause.


Views: 446


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Kenneth Capron on August 8, 2021 at 1:10am



Here's some olden goldies from the vault under my monument buried deep in the stones of Atlantis.
OK. Its a filing cabinet but ... Many may be rusted and decomposing after many long years.
(You will need to eliminate the space in the links so they will work again.)

Wikipedia: Agenda 21
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda 21

UN Agenda 21 - Official Website


UN Environmental Programme Outline - Agenda 21
http://www. unep.org/Documents. MultiIingnal/Default.asp?DocumentID=52

Agenda 21 for Dummies - Video

Wikipedia: Club of Rome
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Club of Rome

Club of Rome (CoR) - Official Website

Agenda 21 & The Club of Rome - Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4aD3 tJNsc

Local Agenda 21 - The UN Plan for Your "Sustainable" Community
http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/Ia21 198.html

Wikipedia: ICLEI

I*C*L*E*I - 'International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives'.
Local Governments for Sustainability

Wikipedia: Maurice Strong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JVlaurice Strong

Maurice Strong - Official Website

Maurice Strong: Many Articles
http://www.earstohear.net/Archives/maurice strong.html

Wikipedia: UNESCO

UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

World Heritage Centre - UNESCO

Anti Communitarian League — The Historical Evolution of Communitarian Thinking

Websites for Freedom
Freedom Advocates/Formerly Freedom 21 Santa Cruz
Michael Shaw

American Policy Center

Tom DeWeese

Sovereignty International
Michael Coffman
http://www.sovereign ty.net/p/clim/

Ed Watch - American Heritage Research
Michael Chapman


Henry Lamb - The Rise of Global Governance
Chairman of Sovereignty International
Founder of Environmental Conservation Organization (ECO) and Freedom21, Inc.
http://www. sovereignty, net/p/clim/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TanftYACLmA&feature=piayer embedded#

Wikipedia: Beverly Eakman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beverly Eakman

Beverly Eakman - Official Website

Education for the New World Order - The Role of Behavioral Psychology
Bev Eakman
http://www.sntp.net/education/behavioral manual.htm

Group Manipulation Video - Beverly Eakman
http://www.freedomadvocates.org/video/watch/13beveakmanongroupmanip... /


The Maine Connection
Sustainable Development Comes to Maine
By Bob Voight - Maine Conservations Rights Institute

Maine Development Foundation

Center for Economic Policy (MECEP)

CEI - Coastal Enterprises Inc.

Western Mountains Alliance

Downeast LNG - Sustainable Economic Development Plan
Washington County

Center for Rural Sustainable Development

Maine Audubon
http://www.maineaudubon.org/conserve/legis/river bond facts.shtml

Sustainable Measures - Maine Development Foundation


Environmental Sustainability Project
http://www.umaine.edu/sustainability/Program Content/sustainable%20conimunities.htm

Catalog of Climate Change Investment Opportunities:
Programs and Projects in Maine

Comment by Kenneth Capron on August 8, 2021 at 12:13am

That site doesn't have its copy of AGENDA-21 anymore.
Anyone got another link?


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."


© 2023   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service