‘Eliminate Him’: A look at the violent rhetoric against Donald Trump

‘Eliminate Him’: A look at the violent rhetoric against Donald Trump

https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/eliminate-him-a-look-a...

Before he was shot at a campaign rally, the former US President faced a barrage of threats from the Left 

.
‘Eliminate Him’: A look at the violent rhetoric against Donald Trump

While the attempted assassination of Donald Trump has been roundly condemned by his political opponents, liberal politicians and pundits have – implicitly and explicitly – called for his death before. 

Trump narrowly avoided death at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on Saturday, when an assassin’s bullet apparently clipped his ear as it whizzed past his head.

The shooter – named by the FBI as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks – killed one spectator at the rally and seriously wounded two others, before he was shot dead by Secret Service agents.

.

US President Joe Biden decried the attempt on Trump’s life, declaring that “there’s no place for this kind of violence in America.”

Ever since Trump won the 2016 election, however, he has faced a steady stream of threats from members of Biden’s party and their allies in the media.

.


Off with his head

Hollywood celebrities reacted with outrage to Trump’s shock defeat of Hillary Clinton in 2016.

80s pop icon Madonna spoke of wanting to “blow up the White House;”

Actor and activist Peter Fonda called for the president’s youngest son, Barron, to be “put in a cage with pedophiles;” and

Comedienne Kathy Griffin grabbed headlines when she posed for a photoshoot holding a mockup of Trump’s bloodied and severed head.

.

Addressing the audience at Britain’s Glastonbury Festival in 2018, Johnny Depp wondered “when was the last time an actor assassinated a president?,” adding “maybe it’s time.”

This reference to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln was echoed by Broadway star Carole Cook several months later, when she asked a photographer “where’s John Wilkes Booth when you need him?”


.

Take him out

.

Speaking to MSNBC after Trump formally announced his presidential campaign last year, Representative Dan Goldman declared that his fellow New Yorker cannot be allowed to “see public office again.”

“He is not only unfit, he is destructive to our democracy, and he has to be, he has to be eliminated,” Goldman proclaimed. 

.

While Goldman later apologized for his choice of words, he is not the only Democrat lawmaker to apparently threaten Trump’s life.

Michigan State Representative Cynthia Johnson was stripped of her committee assignments in 2020 when she warned Trump and his “trumpers” to “walk lightly,” or else her “soldiers” would “make them pay.”

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi used similar rhetoric last week when she declared that the upcoming presidential election “is not a normal election,” and that Trump “must be stopped. He cannot be president.”

Two weeks before the shooting, BBC reporter David Aaronovitch wrote on X that if he were President “Biden, I’d hurry up and have Trump murdered on the basis that he is a threat to America’s security.”

On Sunday morning, Aaronovitch said that he had deleted the tweet, claiming that his words were “clearly satirical.”


.

A threat to democracy

.

Biden’s response to Saturday’s shooting was one of unequivocal condemnation. The US president, who will face off against Trump in this November’s election, said that he was “praying for” his political opponent, and that “we must unite as one nation to condemn”political violence. Biden wanted to look "Presidential"

In a post on social media less than a month earlier, however, Biden’s team described Trump as “a genuine threat to this nation.”

During a recent fundraiser in California, Biden said  “I have one job, and that’s to beat Donald Trump… So, we’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”
.

“He’s a threat to our freedom. He’s a threat to our democracy. He’s literally a threat to everything America stands for,” his managing cabal posted on the president’s social media accounts.

While Biden has never explicitly wished physical harm on his opponent, at least one would-be assassin has used similar words to justify his plans to kill Trump.

77-year-old Thomas Welnicki was arrested for phoning US Capitol Police in 2020 threatening to “take down”then-President Trump.

His lawyer later told prosecutors in New York,  Welnicki was distraught at “the threats to our democracy posed by former President Trump.”

.

Stripped of secret service protection

.

Had Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson, Chairman of the Jan 6 Committee, gotten his way, Trump would have had no Secret Service protection at Saturday’s rally.

Earlier this year, Thompson proposed legislation that would strip this protection from former presidents who were convicted of felonies, as Trump was in May.

The act was explicitly tailored to target Trump, Thompson’s office said, explaining that the former president’s criminal charges “have created a new exigency that Congress must address.”

.
Immediately following Saturday’s shooting, one of Thompson’s staffers wrote on Facebook that the shooter should “get some shooting lessons so you don’t miss next time.”

She deleted the post – which Mississippi Republicans called “despicable” – shortly afterwards.

White House Condemns Proposed Bill Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Register to Vote

“That’s How They Get an Incapacitated Moron like Joe Biden Elected” —

Trump Calls on GOP Lawyers to Sue to Stop Illegals from Voting and Democrats From Cheating in Another Presidential Election

President Donald Trump:

Republicans must pass the Save Act, or go home and cry yourself to sleep.

Non citizen Illegal Migrants are getting the right to vote, being pushed by crooked Democrat Politicians who are not being stopped by an equally dishonest Justice Department.

Our whole voting system is under siege.

Harmeet and David, go to court and get this stopped, NOW.

The Dems can’t win on their policies, the only way they can win is to CHEAT.

They do it at every level of government, and they do it well.

That’s how they get an incapacitated moron like Joe Biden elected.

Get tough RNC (Michael W!), Speaker Johnson, and all State and Local Republican politicians.

The Justice Department is CORRUPT and won’t do a thing to help.

They have no shame!

All I can say is that if I’m elected President, we will pursue Election Fraudsters at levels never seen before, and they will be sent to prison for long periods of time.

We already know who you are. DON’T DO IT! ZUCKERBUCKS, be careful!.

COMMENT

Don’t underestimate the widespread, systematic, built-in cheating, such as with corrupt voter registration rolls.

The voting rules of Democrat states are designed to enable and facilitate massive cheating, such as early voting, mail in ballots, and drop boxes.

Instead of "Election Day" counting of ballots (as in most European countries), it becomes "Election Weeks counting of dubious ballots appeared from wherever, to achieve desired outcomes."

The US Constitution explicitly declares you have to a US citizen to vote in a Presidential Election, in fact, that requirement applies to any election for federal office, such as House and Senate Representatives of the US people.

Those enforceable, Constititional requirements are not just optional suggestions

The Department of Injustice arbitrarily decided, after pushing by the Biden cabal, it would be a "burden" to show proof of citizenship, so therefore states are not required to ask, and in some states election workers are FORBIDDEN BY LAW to ask, such as Vermont, the impoverished SOCIALIST state.

Such rules have consequences. The rules are incitements to chaos, frustration and violence, make the US look like a banana republic, the world's laughing stock.

The US Supreme Court should immediately rule each voter is required to show proof of citizenship, to ensure the US Constitution is upheld BEFORE any voting and counting of ballots.

Regarding unbridled, unconstitutional law-fare,

Garland, the Department of Injustice arbitrarily decided to appoint a Special Prosecutor, named Brown, who raided Trump's home in Florida to search for government documents.

Are many months, Federal Judge Cannon ruled the appointment and the search unconstitutional, because Garland has the authority to PROPOSE A NAME for a Special Prosecutor, but the US Congress has the sole authority, per the US Constitution, to actually appoint and empower such a Special Prosecutor. 

The U.S. House of Representatives passed the “Safe Act” last week, that requires a person has to be an American citizen to vote in a federal election.

President Biden has vowed to veto the law if it comes to his desk.

Democrats are not democratic.

They are power-hungry authoritarians.

Democrats want their systemic, voting/ballot-counting structure to remain intact, to maintain/increase their total command/control of the federal government.

They are willing to vilify, lawfare, put in jail, bullseye, and assassinate to protect their structure from challengers

It takes just a minor cynic to believe, the Deep State aided/abetted the assassination attempt on Trump, by recruiting a weak, impressionable mind to do the dirty work, then snuff him out immediately after he fired about 9 shots. 

Why was that roof, 130 yards from Trump, with a clear line of sight of the podium, available to an assassin with an AR-22 rifle, and not occupied by police?

Why did police and Secret Service ignore a warning by a spectator, who told them someone was climbing on that roof with a rifle?

Investigators, including of the Secret Service, will undertake to investigate the assassination attempt.

These same investigators have moved heaven and earth to harass Trump legally and politically for much of the last eight years. 

Is there any evidence, Merritt Garland’s US Justice Department has been fair and impartial about anything, especially regarding Trump?

As always, the investigators will double-dog dare anyone to question their integrity.

The lapdog Media will be enlisted to help out. 

Should Trump Have a Private Security, Instead of the Secret Service

By Dr Joseph Sansone

.

On Saturday, July 13th, 2024, President Trump was shot at a rally in Butler Pennsylvania by a sniper on a roof top, approximately 150 feet away. The bullet pierced his ear, but apparently did not do any serious or life threatening damage.

Trump’s courageous response attempting to go back to the microphone telling people to fight with blood coming from his ear sealed his general election victory in the 2024 Presidential election race.

Cheating on the computer vote and mail in vote will be too risky.

Trump’s statement that he put out Sunday morning indicates that he will not be intimidated:

Thank you to everyone for your thoughts and prayers yesterday, as it was God alone who prevented the unthinkable from happening.

We will FEAR NOT, but instead remain resilient in our Faith and Defiant in the face of Wickedness.

Our love goes out to the other victims and their families.

We pray for the recovery of those who were wounded, and hold in our hearts the memory of the citizen who was so horribly killed.

In this moment, it is more important than ever that we stand United, and show our True Character as Americans, remaining Strong and Determined, and not allowing Evil to Win.

I truly love our Country, and love you all, and look forward to speaking to our Great Nation this week from Wisconsin.

Information continues to come out on the shooting.

Revolver News has raised some serious questions in this article.

For starters, why weren’t all the nearby roof tops secured? There were only a few.

In the video embedded in the article you can see the secret service agent pointing his rifle at the sniper on the roof. Yet he did not fire at the sniper until AFTER NINE shots were fired.

Even more disturbing is the video interview of an eyewitness in the parking lot where the sniper was shooting from.

The witness said that he notified the police about the man on the roof, and nobody did anything.

His questions were pertinent.

Why didn’t they get Trump out of there before the shooting, if they were told there was a sniper on the roof.

In the time it took to get the secret service sniper on the roof, it would have been wise to also get Trump off the stage.     

The FBI will investigate the attempted assassination. The odds that the FBI is going to report that this was an inside job or a set up is highly remote.

However, when the police are being told there is a sniper on the roof and nobody does anything, that lends itself to this being an inside job.

During the COVID lockdowns there weren’t mass shootings? Why is that?

To varying degrees, people were caged up like animals. Forced to wear masks, follow lines on the floor, stand six feet apart, threatened to lose their jobs if they did not get a bioweapon injection, and so on.

I remember walking in the grocery store for 4 months being the only normal person without a mask.

Why weren’t there mass shootings all over the place?

That should have driven people over the edge to commit such acts everywhere. Yet they didn’t happen.

This points to a few simple explanations.

Overwhelmingly these public shootings are the product of government mind control, brain washing, or simply enabling someone that already has mal intent.

We must consider that these assassins are also the product of government mind control, brain washing, or simply enablement?

Historically, any major figure that attempts to buck the system or shadow government too hard, regardless of ideology gets shot.

Teddy Roosevelt on the Bull Moose Ticket, Huey Long, JFK, RFK, MLK, George Wallace, Reagan, Trump. I am probably missing a few names in this list.

Reagan’s presidency was a shadow of its promise after he survived an assassination attempt.

In the aftermath of this shooting, Trump’s choice of a VP will indicate whether he is caving to intimidation or not. If he picks a neocon, then it would appear that he was in fact wavering.

It appears that the U.S. government or elements within the U.S. government attempted to assassinate President Trump.

Since the 2024 presidential election is already won, it means the government, or these elements may try to assassinate him again.

It means President Trump needs to reevaluate his security detail.

It has been reported that the Trump campaign has been requesting more enhanced security and that this security has been routinely denied.

Given the incompetence, or collaboration and involvement of the secret service, should Trump consider a private security detail.

Biden’s comments to big donors about putting Trump in the bullseye may have been rhetoric.

Still, it has long been said, the Secret Service’s guns point in both directions.

It would cost a fortune, but Trump should consider using private security for the rest of the campaign and even after he gets elected.

Since the election now appears to be a formality, it is likely the shadow government may strike again.

If Trump doesn’t employ a private security detail, he sure needs to hand select his Secret Service…

My self, I’d go with the private security.

Views: 22

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2025   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service