Electric Vehicles: Not a Panacea for the Gas Crunch

The elitists have ordained that we shall all drive EV's. But did anybody ask us? How much do you think our corrupt green politicians have spent on EV and renewable energy personal investments? Why do they wage war on fossil fuel but approve that we tear up the earth looking for the rare metals required to be "green"?

By Walter Myers III March 9, 2022 

Former Mayor of South Bend, Indiana, and current Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg recently argued that electric vehicles were an affordable solution to the now record gas prices. But he didn’t specifically say how.  It turns out that if one considers the real costs and practicalities of owning and operating an electric vehicle, his statement is false. 

While the prices of electric vehicles are indeed coming down, the average electric vehicle still costs more than $50,000, which is vastly more than most Americans can afford. And sadly, it is those who can least afford electric vehicles that are being hurt the most by the massive inflation brought about in large part by the Biden administration’s over year-long war on fossil fuel production—which are now going to be exacerbated by sanctions on Russian oil due to the war with Ukraine. 

Just last week, former Michigan governor and current Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm reiterated that the country is currently in an energy transition off oil and gas, seeming oblivious to the financial pain the Biden administration is causing families across America. 

Do the benefits of electric vehicles offset this pain? Let’s look at the numbers. In 2021, 14.9 million light vehicles were sold in America, of which about 3% were electric vehicles. The average price of a new gas-powered light vehicle in 2020 was $38,960.  So the purchaser of an electric vehicle would need to be able to make up the difference in fuel costs to justify an electric vehicle purchase. It costs less to fuel an electric vehicle, but since the costs vary wildly based on where and when you charge, it’s hard to make a meaningful comparison.    

But let’s consider some real-world initial operating costs and practical issues.  Charging at home, late at night, is the least costly option.  But charging on standard household current (called Level 1 charging) can take up to three days depending on battery capacity. Installing a 240-volt circuit allows for charging overnight (called Level 2 charging), but purchasing the charger and having it installed can cost as much as $1500

Then there are the annual costs. A 2020 Tesla Model 3 needs about 24 kWh to drive 100 miles. In Southern California, electric vehicle owners qualify for a “Time-of-Use” (TOU) rate plan, which during the winter months is 21 cents/kWh off-peak (between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m.). Given the average miles driven per year (14,300 miles per the Federal Highway Administration), the driver would need 3,432 kWh of charge per year, which at 21 cents/kWh costs $720.72. This is roughly one-half the annual cost to fuel an average gasoline-powered vehicle, which according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics was $1,568 in 2020. 

Given that an average electric vehicle costs about $11,000 more than a gasoline powered vehicle, it would take 14 years on average to break even in terms of fuel costs, not factoring in the cost of installing a 240-volt charger. In short, while the numbers are increasing year over year, particularly as gas prices increase, the lower costs to fuel an electric vehicle over the life of a vehicle is nowhere near making up for the increased expense of purchasing an electric vehicle. 

Furthermore, if it’s impractical for a homeowner to charge at home, or if the electric vehicle owner lives in an apartment, then the owner will have no choice but to leverage fast DC charging pay stations, which are more costly.  Some automobile manufacturers provide free fast DC charging, covering a set dollar amount or a period of time (some up to three years). After that, the owner pays. 

As an example, in California, Electrify America fast DC charging stations charge 43 cents/kWh without a membership plan, but for a small monthly fee will only charge 31 cents/kWh on their Pass+ monthly plan. Clearly, the membership plan makes more sense, but it is still 50% more than charging at home late at night. And again, a fast charger would most likely be the only practical option for an apartment dweller. All these factors make the electric vehicle even less attractive in terms of the cost. 

So far, I have only discussed the costs of owning an electric vehicle. What I have not covered, as the owner of an Audi e-tron electric vehicle (who also happens to have solar that helps lower my electricity costs), are the downsides of owning an electric vehicle. I personally love mine. But they are simply not for everyone, and you should not be gaslighted into believing you need to own one.  In short, electric vehicles are highly inconvenient, unless you live in a house and charge at night with a Level 2 charger. They are even more of an inconvenience on longer trips since you will have to plan around battery capacity. 

First, anyone who purchases an electric vehicle should know that current batteries degrade over time—they generally have a useful life of eight to ten years at best. And degradation can be greatly accelerated if an electric vehicle owner regularly charges to 100% with fast DC chargers. That is why virtually all manufacturers strongly suggest that on a regular basis to not charge an electric vehicle above 80%, and to not allow the battery to discharge to below 20%. And by no means should an owner ever allow the battery to discharge close to 0%. 

It’s okay to charge to 100% for the occasional long trip, but it is your responsibility to protect the life of your battery, particularly if you are purchasing the car and not leasing. Not doing so can be very costly for you at trade-in time if your battery only has 70% of its original capacity after four to five years of use. 

Second, most electric vehicles have a lower range relative to gasoline-powered vehicles. Tesla is among the highest, making it the most practical based on the requirement for normal operation within the 20-80% state of charge (SoC). But if you own an electric vehicle with the typical range of between 240 to 300 miles, then the SoC for the lower range would yield about 144 drivable miles, while on the higher range, a full SoC would yield about 180 miles. If you lack the convenience of Level 2 charging at home, this will mean charging twice a week at fast DC chargers in both cases, presuming an average mileage of 275 miles per week (14,300 miles divided by 52 weeks). 

Third, it typically takes about 30-40 minutes to charge a car from 20% to 80% at a fast DC charger, depending on the capacity, which is typically in the range of 150 kW to 350 kW (charger capacity can be much lower at retail locations, making them less suitable for receiving a full charge). One also must locate an available fast DC charger – usually by searching the web or with a smartphone app. 

Fourth, as more and more people drive electric vehicles, invariably there will be charging bottlenecks. Since it takes so long to charge, owners will typically leave their car to get a coffee or do some quick shopping while they’re charging.  So you must always be prepared to wait even after the charger you are waiting for has completed charging. 

Fifth, if you’re not a good planner, don’t bother with an electric vehicle. You will often find yourself in a situation where you don’t have enough range to safely drive your vehicle to your destination. In that case, you will have to find a fast DC charger and wait, a situation I have found myself in numerous times. Again, do not drive your car down anything close to 0%, under any circumstances. 

Finally, don’t buy into the myth that electric vehicles are “zero-emission.” Electric vehicles are built using fossil fuels, and manufacturing batteries is an especially dirty business.  Only 20% of the electric power source is from renewable energy sources (but again, remember it takes fossil fuels to construct renewable sources of energy).  The remaining 80% of the power is generated by natural gas, coal, or nuclear.  Natural gas and nuclear are actually among the cleanest sources of energy, which you will never hear from the Biden administration. 

The full article is at the following weblink:

https://www.discovery.org/a/electric-vehicles-not-a-panacea-for-the...

Biden Energy Secretary Claims Higher Gas Prices Will Allow for ‘Transition’ From Fossil Fuels
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/biden-energy-secretary-claims-higher-...

 

Fast Lane Inflation: Used Cars Up 41.2%, New Cars Up 12.4%
https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2022/03/10/auto-industry-prices-s...

  

Why Did the World Economic Forum Just Remove the Cyber Polygon Page From Their Website?
The World Economic Forum isn't known for being shy about their initiatives and ambitions. What is it about their cyber-pandemic brainchild that suddenly made them erase history?
https://noqreport.com/2022/03/10/why-did-the-world-economic-forum-j...

 

Project Veritas: NY Times Reporter: Jan. 6 Media Coverage Over-the-Top: “There Were a Ton of FBI Informants Amongst the People who Attacked the Capitol” (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/project-veritas-ny-times-r...

 

The Gas Crisis Plays An Essential Role In The Great Reset Agenda
https://www.infowars.com/posts/the-gas-crisis-plays-an-essential-ro...

 

Colorado Clerk Tina Peters Indicted One Week After She Releases Findings on Dominion Voting Machines in the State
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/colorado-clerk-tina-peters...

 

Oliver Stone's "Ukraine on Fire" (FREE)
https://rumble.com/embed/vubrga/

Biden Nat’l Economic Council Head Deese: ‘No Amount of Domestic Production We Can Do to Reduce’ Gas Prices
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/03/09/biden-natl-economic-coun...

 

REPORT: Democrats Met With Oil Execs Last Year And Pressured Them To Decrease Output Over Climate Change
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/03/report-democrats-met-oil-e...

 

Inflation Reaches New High as Consumer Prices Jump 7.9%, Highest in Four Decades
Inflation climbed to another four-decade high in February with prices expected to push even higher on the back of soaring energy prices following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2022/03/10/inflation-february/

 

Glenn Greenwald Slays 'Fact Checkers' After Nuland's Ukraine Biolab Bombshell
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/greenwald-slays-fact-checkers-a...


A graduate of the University of Alaska Fairbanks, Schuler had a unique introduction to the World Trade Center evidence when he learned that researchers at his alma mater had produced a major report on Building 7.
https://www.ae911truth.org/news/823-engineer-john-schuler-on-educat...

Views: 162

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Willem Post on March 11, 2022 at 12:35pm

Tungsten, a major component in batteries, costs $100,000/ metric ton

Model 3 and Y prices just increased by another $1000.

This is entirely due to idiot bureaucrats in  Brussels telling EU countries not to sign long-term gas supply contracts with Russia, because it sends the message THE EU IS NOT GREEN

Russia supplies gas only to those countries who have long-term contracts.

Countries that do not, have to buy on the spot market at 5 to 15 times the long-term price

Idiot bureaucrats did not foresee the increase in spot prices.

It gets worse, because wind and solar had been under performing for many months compared to prior years, so storage had been drawn down to dangerous levels….

Russia has no contractual obligation to fill below and above ground gas storage reservoirs 
Russia has no contractural obligation to supply gas to lower gas spot prices

Impoverished Ukraine will do anything to make a buck. The US is taking advantage of that

Ukraine has between 11 and 23, US-financed, bio labs that do RESEARCH.

Russia and China have the insider documents regarding the research 

Nuland testified to that a few days ago

Of course, bio lab research has to come before bio WEAPONS, which are specifically forbidden.

So, the US Department of Defense can have hundreds of bio labs all over the world, but not use the knowledge gained to make weapons. That seems odd to me 

Of course, to go from research takes many years, to weapons takes just a few months,

Who is kidding whom? 

Comment by Tom Harris on March 10, 2022 at 4:42pm

Thanks for your article on EVs. Here is mine just published: https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2022/03/09/joe_bidens_elec.... I hope people can share far and wide!

Tom Harris

Ottawa, Canada

Comment by Kenneth Capron on March 10, 2022 at 4:26pm

I hope everyone caught the segment on WGAN with Craig Peterson when he talked about
the need for commercial grade neon for EV batteries? And guess where neon comes from?
Begins with 'U' and ends with 'e' - Ukraine!! 90% of U.S. supply of neon comes from Ukraine.

 
This will have a huge impact on EV’s – EV batteries require neon – neon comes 90% from the Ukraine.  @1:25
45% of world palladium from Russia
Comment by arthur qwenk on March 10, 2022 at 1:27pm

I wish November 8, 2022 was tomorrow.

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service