BDN: Massachusetts regulators OK key contracts for proposed CMP hydropower project

By Lori Valigra, BDN Staff • June 26, 2019 1:34 pm
Updated: June 26, 2019 1:55 pm

The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities has approved power purchase agreements that are key to the proposed $1 billion hydropower transmission line through western Maine.

Hydro-Quebec, which is a partner with Central Maine Power on the proposed line, said Wednesday that the regulator had approved the agreements signed between Hydro-Quebec and Massachusetts electric distribution companies for the proposed New England Clean Energy Connect hydropower project.

The approval comes about one year after CMP, Hydro-Quebec and the distribution companies signed long-term contracts. The regulators’ approval was required after that.

The electric distribution companies transmit and deliver electricity to homes or businesses.

“Approval of the contracts by Massachusetts is an important step toward a clean energy future in the Northeast,” Eric Martel, Hydro-Quebec’s CEO, said in a prepared statement. “We will continue to work closely with our partner Central Maine Power to secure the remaining permits necessary for the transmission line that’s needed to deliver that energy, both in Maine and in Quebec.”

CMP received a key permit from the Maine Public Utilities Commission in April. It is awaiting other regulatory approvals, including from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, and which are expected this fall. The project also has received a permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Committee, according to Hydro-Quebec.

In its Wednesday announcement, Hydro-Quebec said the Massachusetts regulatory agency in its decision underscored that “the energy delivered under the [power purchase agreements] will create steady greenhouse gas emissions reductions benefits to Massachusetts.”

Continue reading here:

Despite emissions concerns, Hydro-Quebec contracts OK’d by Mass DPU

DPU rejects criticism from Healey, enviros, power generators

THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES on Tuesday approved massive hydro-electricity contracts between the state’s three utilities and Hydro-Quebec, rejecting arguments from a broad range of skeptics questioning the environmental benefits of the deal.

The hydro-electricity will be produced in Quebec and shipped across the border into Maine, where a transmission line built by Central Maine Power will carry it to Lewiston, Maine, where it will feed into the New England power grid.

The power is firm (meaning it will run reliably and constantly all year long), large (the equivalent of 1,000 megawatts of capacity), and relatively cheap (5.9 cents a kilowatt hour versus the Vineyard Wind offshore wind contract price of 6.5 cents a kilowatt hour). The project is a perfect replacement for the many power plants retiring over the next few years across the region. Pilgrim Station in Plymouth, which closed at the end of May, had a generating capacity of 690 megawatts.

But the decision to approve the contracts was not without controversy. A wide spectrum of diverse critics, from Attorney General Maura Healey to the New England Power Generators Association, criticized the contracts for not guaranteeing that the hydro-electricity delivered into New England will represent net new power delivering an actual reduction in greenhouse gas emissions across the region.

Critics said the power being delivered by Hydro-Quebec will come from dams that are already operating, so the deal with the Massachusetts utilities won’t actually result in a net reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Much of the DPU’s 153-page decision focused on how to measure whether Hydro-Quebec is upping hydro-electricity production or just shipping electricity in a new direction.

Healey claimed that contracts negotiated by Eversource Energy and Unitil could allow Hydro-Quebec to decrease its overall electricity imports into New England relative to the historical average and still comply with the terms of the deal.

“The order entirely side-steps the requirement that this contract be incremental to historical deliveries by Hydro Quebec into New England,” said Dan Dolan, the president of the New England Power Generators Association. “That means that any hopes that this would help reduce greenhouse gas emissions will be little more than an accounting trick.”

Baker administration officials steered clear of the broader emissions debate, and focused on the procurement of clean energy that will techni

Continue reading here:


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views: 164


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Barbara Durkin on June 26, 2019 at 11:57pm
>>>Vineyard Wind offshore wind contract price of 6.5 cents a kilowatt hour

Neither transmission, batteries, ports’ upgrades nor special purpose vessels are included.
The piece meal method & OPM are the only reasons why this project has advanced.

It’s pretty foolish to expect CMP’(Avangrid partner of Vineyard Wind) to improve their attitude in the marine environment.

It’s also foolish to ignore the 100% cable failure rate of DeepWater Wind.

Moratorium Needed.
Comment by Willem Post on June 26, 2019 at 10:10pm

Offshore wind at 6.5 c/kWh is for the first year, and will escalate at 2.5%/y for 20 years.

It requires huge subsidies to be able to offer such prices.

Without the subsidies, the price would be about 40 to 50 percent higher.

This is for variable, intermittent electricity, not dispatchable, not on demand.

The other generators have to do babysitting, i.e., inefficiently ramp up and down and inefficiently make more frequent starts and stops to accommodate wind, a freebie not charged to wind owners.

Major grid modifications would be required, another freebie not charged to wind owners.

HQ hydro at 5.9 c/kWh is firm for TWENTY YEARS, no escalation!!!

It is on demand, not variable, not intermittent 

It does not require babysitting.

It does not require subsidies 

The two are apples and oranges.

The two are absolutely not comparable 


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.”

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service