Constellation Energy plans to retire a Massachusetts gas power plant at the end of May

Constellation Energy plans to retire a Massachusetts gas power plant at the end of May, which will eliminate the biggest user of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) that is imported through the company’s Everett Marine Terminal. Constellation is trying to line up new gas buyers to keep the terminal running. If it cannot, it will likely close the import facility. New England utilities rely on imported LNG supplies for heating during the winter when demand peaks. National Grid, which has more than two million gas customers in Massachusetts and New York, obtains gas from the Everett terminal that it pipes around Boston and trucks to storage tanks across the region ahead of each winter. Without it, severe cold could leave their customers without gas to heat their homes. Despite the United States being awash with natural gas, Massachusetts relies on imported LNG because the state has opposed pipelines to get natural gas from nearby Pennsylvania production wells—gas that would be significantly cheaper than imported LNG. New England residents paid about 31 percent more for natural gas in the fourth quarter of 2023 than the U.S. average, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Constellation is planning to close the 1.4 gigawatt Mystic Generating Station at the May 31 expiration of a deal with regulators–a two-year agreement intended to bolster the region’s energy supplies. A big issue for keeping the nearby LNG terminal open is how to cover the terminal’s overhead, most of which is currently recouped through New England electricity bills tied to the nearby power plant. It could cost about $60 million a year to cover the terminal’s fixed operating costs, plus the price of the LNG, which could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

According to regulators, a December 2022 winter storm serves as an example of why utilities need quick access to reserves of natural gas. The winter storm caused demand to surge and gas wells in Appalachia to freeze with pressure dropping dangerously low on the Consolidated Edison’s pipeline system around New York City. The utility was able to tap its own LNG reserves to stave off damage that could have knocked out service and taken months to repair. Everett LNG was and is the insurance against the lights and heat going out during extremely cold stretches.

New England’s Need for Everett

The Everett LNG Terminal is needed because of the difficulty of building energy infrastructure in the Northeast. Pipeline projects have been blocked that would deliver gas from shale-gas fields in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia. For example, in 2016, Massachusetts and New Hampshire blocked financing for the $3 billion Access Northeast Pipeline, which would have lowered prices and eliminated the reliance on LNG. Since 1971, the Everett Marine Terminal has been providing gas to New England and is one of the few remaining import terminals in the United States. When the shale gas renaissance made the United States the largest producer of natural gas in the world, most of the U.S. import LNG facilities were retooled to become export terminals. Last year the United States became the world’s largest exporter of LNG.

The tankers filled with U.S. LNG, however, are not allowed to deliver the fuel to Everett or anywhere else in the United States due to the Jones Act–a 1920 law that restricts domestic shipping routes to U.S.-built and American-crewed vessels. Despite New England being served by a pair of interstate pipelines and Canadian gas, it has had to obtain additional supplies from more expensive imports from overseas, usually from Trinidad and Tobago, but also from Russia before sanctions stopped those imports due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

New England Faces Challenges to Its Grid Due to Plant Closures

Both the power plant and the LNG facility’s shutdown underscores the challenges facing the American grid as the transition to green energy and Biden’s climate agenda accelerates. While Mystic may ultimately be replaced by intermittent wind farms and solar projects, it is not clear whether those facilities and the expensive battery storage needed to back up their unreliable power will be built quickly enough to prevent power shortfalls.

Renewable-power projects have met resistance in the Northeast. For example, in 2021, Maine voters scotched a transmission line that would carry hydropower from the Canadian border toward Boston. A transmission line being laid along the bottom of the Hudson River to carry hydropower from Quebec’s remote forests to New York City took 15 years to clear permitting and other hurdles before work began last year. Some New York offshore wind projects have been canceled or are in limbo after regulators rejected developers’ requests to charge higher power rates to account for their rising costs. In New Jersey, a European wind-power company canceled plans for two wind farms despite state financial incentives.

“Ensuring reliability and affordability could become challenging in the face of a significant winter event,” FERC Chairman Willie Phillips and NERC Chief Executive Officer James Robb said in a joint statement in November. According to the New England grid operator, it would be prudent to keep Everett operating for now. The number of LNG import facilities in the region is limited, new infrastructure could face delays and there’s uncertainty about how much winter power demand will grow as homes and businesses convert to electricity from gas.

Conclusion

The Mystic Power Plant and the Everett LNG terminal may close at the end of May if regulators do not keep it open and/or if the LNG import terminal cannot find enough customers to cover its costs. This puts the region in jeopardy during cold New England winters with possibly insufficient fuel to keep furnaces going and the lights on. Many see the Everett LNG import terminal as insurance against demand spikes and freezing weather that could make existing infrastructure inoperative. Biden’s rush to push green energy in the form of intermittent and unreliable wind and solar power on Americans is putting the electric grid in jeopardy and New England may be the first to experience the damage. The Biden Administration seems to be ignoring this growing problem, preferring to focus on its “climate change” agenda which includes ending all fossil fuels, including natural gas.

Views: 39

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Willem Post on January 26, 2024 at 11:10am

Doubling down on Offshore to lose more money on projects, and to increase household electric rates to astronomical levels during an election year, and achieve NO reduction in CO2 or in atmospheric temperature?

These offshore wind projects benefit only the large wind conglomerates in Europe.

These wind turbines and supporting electrical systems are made in Europe, then shipped to the US, and are financed by European pension funds.

Eastern States get all the ugliness, and a higher cost of electricity, and the taxpayers have to pay for 50% subsidies, and the workers in Eastern states have to be soooo grateful to do some of the maintenance, with very expensive replacement parts coming from Europe

Biden and Mill of Maine and Murphy of New Jersey are royally screwing the US people for the benefit of Europeans.

Vote Trump in with a landslide, so he can wipe out all the Biden idiocy off the map

WORLD’s LARGEST OFFSHORE WIND SYSTEM DEVELOPER ABANDONS TWO MAJOR US PROJECTS AS WIND BUST CONTINUES  

https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/world-s-largest-offsho...

EXCTRACT:

New York State had signed contracts with EU big wind companies for four offshore wind projects

Sometime later, the companies were trying to coerce an additional $25.35 billion (per Wind Watch) from New York ratepayers and taxpayers over at least 20 years, because they had bid at lower prices than they should have.

New York State denied the request on October 12, 2023; “a deal is a deal”, said the Commissioner 

 

Owners want a return on investment of at least 10%/y, if bank loans for risky projects are 6.5%/y, and project cost inflation and uncertainties are high 

The about 3.5% is a minimum for all the years of hassles of designing, building, erecting, and paperwork of a project

The project prices, with no subsidies, would be about two times the agreed contract price, paid by Utilities to owners.

The reduction is due to US subsidies provided, per various US laws

All contractors had bid too low. When they realized there would be huge losses, they asked for higher contract prices.

It looks like the contract prices will need to be at least $150/MWh, for contractors to make money. Those contract prices would be at least 60% higher than in 2021

Oersted, Denmark, Sunrise wind, contract price $110.37/MWh, contractor needs $139.99/MWh, a 27% increase

Equinor, Norway, Empire 1 wind, contract price $118.38/MWh, contractor needs $159.64/MWh, a 35% increase

Equinor, Norway, Empire 2 wind, contract price $107.50/MWh, contractor needs $177.84/MWh, a 66% increase

Equinor, Norway, Beacon Wind, contract price $118.00/MWh, contractor needs $190.82/MWh, a 62% increase

https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/liars-lies-exposed-as-...

NOTE: Empire Wind 2, 1260 MW, near Long- Island, was cancelled.

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/equinor-bp-cancel-contract-...

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service