Connecticut Moving Towards Large Hydro as a Renewable?

State energy bill passes Senate, moves to House

Updated 10:53 pm, Wednesday, May 1, 2013

HARTFORD -- The Senate on Wednesday easily passed legislation that the Gov. Dannel P. Malloy administration says would foster renewable sources of energy and lower state electric costs.

But consumer and environmental activists oppose the bill, saying it is tailored for Northeast Utilities to cut a major deal with Canadian hydropower at the expense of Connecticut's budding solar- and wind-power industries.

The legislation, which for the first time would consider large-scale hydropower a state renewable resource, passed the Senate 26-6 and next moves to the House.

State Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, co-chairman of the legislative Energy and Technology Committee, said the bill would allow the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection to establish contracts for as long as 15 years, giving potential power suppliers a stable market in which to develop new technologies.

"What we're trying to do here is get more cheaper, cleaner renewable energy," Duff said. "The cost of doing nothing will raise rates. This is why this bill is so important. We're trying to think big."

Sen. Michael A. McLachlan, R-Danbury, said he was worried about the potential length of the deals.

"I'm very uncomfortable with long-term contracts," he said during the floor debate. "I think the energy business is too volatile for a long-term contract."

The center of the bill is the state's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which requires the state to use 20 percent renewable-energy sources by the year 2020. A number of different benchmarks would have to be met before large-scale hydropower is used, Duff said.

Tom Swan, executive director of the nonprofit Connecticut Citizen Action Group, who joined environmental groups in lobbying against the bill, said it's a victory for the power industry and "climate change deniers," while weakening the state's portfolio of renewable energy.

"It would be a disincentive to create the kind of wind and solar we're going to need in the future," Swan said in a phone interview.

Please continue reading at:

http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/State-energy-bill-passes-Senate...

Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views: 193

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Penny Melko on May 4, 2013 at 3:06am
Just curious how a cold state like Connecticut can move toward industrial solar and wind energy??? Lots of sun is needed for solar and the wind must blow for wind energy. I know why hydro is "appealing" if the word can be used in this context. Here is an article on hydro and why it's used in conjunction with wind power. You might want to visualize what is done to a mountain top using pumped storage hydro in your beautiful forests. http://www.hydroworld.com/industry-news/pumped-storage-hydro.2.left...
Comment by Long Islander on May 3, 2013 at 1:28pm

This is not the first time that Connecticut is questioning the absurdity of it all. See:

Connecticut Bill Would Cut Renewable Energy Targets from 2010, where it was written:

"Large scale renewables are not going to be built in this state. And if that's the case, how can I justify spending $300 million a year of rate payer dollars?" said Rep. Elizabeth H. Etsy, D-Cheshire. "We are putting a lot of money from our small state into this."

Fonfara said the alternative, subsidizing purchase of energy-efficient products by consumers, will keep the money in the state and provide easy financing for residents to reduce their energy consumption. He said the proposed bill would provide loans that would be paid through a customer's utility bill over the expected life of the product purchased.

"This is good for the environment and taxpayers. I have no interest in spending their money by supporting a power plant in upstate Maine," he said.

Comment by Art Brigades on May 3, 2013 at 11:42am

This is good news for Maine because if they actually do it, it will mean less demand for wind power...and we all know there will never be much wind power sited in Connecticut.  Maine legislators still have LD 646 under consideration in the Energy & Utility Committee. 

Comment by alice mckay barnett on May 3, 2013 at 8:24am

hydro is renewable how can it weaken the state's portfolio?

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service