By Murray Carpenter
July 21, 2024
A Maine Monitor analysis finds developers have bundled projects, then sold them to some of the world’s largest corporations and investment firms.
Maine’s community solar program, commonly known as net energy billing, has been wildly successful in incentivizing the development of small-scale solar power projects. They’ve popped up like mushrooms as developers chase the deals codified by state lawmakers, allowing them to sell power at a premium above market rates.
Some critics point out that the situation has also allowed large corporations and private equity firms to pocket Maine ratepayers’ cash. But a Maine Monitor analysis found it’s hard to track this pattern because the ownership is often opaque, and no state entity keeps tabs on it.
Community solar — which includes projects producing less than 5 megawatts of energy — is a bit complicated. Subscribers don’t receive power directly from the projects, but instead get credits for the power that is generated. The credits offset their electricity use, and should lower their electricity bills, while supporting renewable energy.
According to a new solar dashboard developed by the Governor’s Energy Office, the state has 453 projects totaling 630 megawatts of operational solar energy in its net energy billing programs developed since the enabling legislation passed in 2019. (The figure excludes residential rooftop solar.)
Although the Governor’s Energy Office tallies the power generated by the projects, it does not track ownership. The Public Utilities Commission posts reports filed by Central Maine Power and Versant that show the projects participating in net energy billing, but the owners are redacted.
Corporate deals
While it’s hard to get details, corporate press releases offer glimpses into the deals.
In March 2021, Nautilus Solar, owned by Power Corporation of Canada, announced it was buying solar projects in Cumberland, Knox, Oxford and York counties. Nautilus bought two projects in Aroostook County later that year.
In December 2021, Goldman Sachs Asset Management announced it was buying 11 solar projects in the net energy billing program from a Pennsylvania developer, Dynamic Energy. (Goldman Sachs has since spun off its solar holdings into a new corporation called MN8 Energy.)
In January 2022, Distributed Solar Generation, owned by BlackRock, said it was buying net energy billing projects in Rumford and Windham from Mainely Solar.
These corporate deals appear to include projects that are permitted but not yet constructed, so it’s hard to know what percentage they represent of the operational energy in Maine. Two more large corporations account for a significant amount of the energy produced in the net energy billing program.
In December 2022, the Brookfield company Luminace bought net energy billing solar projects in Bristol, Emden and Woolwich, with 21.6 megawatts of capacity, from EDF Renewable. Between Luminance and Standard Solar, Brookfield companies have a capacity of about 113 megawatts of Maine solar.
Nexamp, owned by Mitsubishi, has about two dozen projects totaling 165 megawatts of capacity in the net energy billing program, with more in the pipeline. (Disclosure: This reporter is a Nexamp subscriber).
Unlike the projects developers have bundled and sold, spokesperson Keith Hevenor said Nexamp has an integrated business model. “We own and operate all of our projects for the long term,” he said, “handling everything from development and engineering to construction, operation and customer management in-house.”
Concerns over ownership
Lawmakers and other observers have questioned where the money being poured into community solar programs is ending up.
Rep. Sophie Warren (D-Scarborough) ran for the legislature to take action on climate change. She supports solar energy but takes issue with the structure of the program.
“I really do believe … that a majority of Mainers don’t want to see us paying for projects out of our utility bills to corporations and private equity interests,” Warren said. “I think that’s wholly inappropriate. We’ve got to move beyond just fighting climate change to doing it in a way that is just.”
Warren said she would rather see larger, grid-scale solar projects that can produce power at lower rates. And she feels the current program is regressive because ratepayers bear the cost.
Article continues at https://themainemonitor.org/community-solar-ownership/
*************************************
Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Comment
It would be helpful if the climate alarmists in charge of public policies knew the role of C02 in the atmosphere and natural climate cycles. The government that gives reparations to weather damages, as in FEMA, can take it away in the name of climate change while instituting new taxes. What is really behind this scam? Is government trustworthy? Ask anyone involved in public policy the amount of C02 in the atmosphere in parts per million. Ask them for a historical timeline of the amount of the atmospheric C02. Ask them the parts per million that best promotes vegetative growth. Ask them why they do not consider that natural climate cycles drive the parts per million of C02 balance.
Ban all large scale solar installations on agricultural lands and forest lands. If these politicians really believe that weak and intermittent wind and solar are going to power the planet, including AI and the Cloud and gazillions of electric vehicles, they need to go back to school.
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2024 Created by Webmaster. Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine