Maine Guide F. Lee Corrigan Stands up for the Maine Woods as Slick Portland Lawyer Stumbles

 

 


VIDEO

Impact on wildlife focus of LURC’s hearing on Bowers Mountain wind project

By , BDN Staff

Posted July 06, 2011, at 1:29 p.m.
Last modified July 06, 2011, at 9:40 p.m.
MUST SEE VIDEO:
James Palmer, Ph.D., of Scenic Quality Consultants of Burlington, Vermont, listens to the line of questioning presented by attorney Juliet T. Browne, who is representing Champlain Wind LLC, during the Bowers Wind Power Project Hearing on Wednesday, July 6, 2011, at the Spectacular Event Center in Bangor. The hearing is part of a series of public forums held by Maine's Land Use Regulation Commission to allow both the public and the applicant opportunities to present testimony for and against the wind power development.
James Palmer, Ph.D., of Scenic Quality Consultants of Burlington, Vermont, listens to the line of questioning presented by attorney Juliet T. Browne, who is representing Champlain Wind LLC, during the Bowers Wind Power Project Hearing on Wednesday, July 6, 2011, at the Spectacular Event Center in Bangor. The hearing is part of a series of public forums held by Maine's Land Use Regulation Commission to allow both the public and the applicant opportunities to present testimony for and against the wind power development. Buy Photo

View Bowers Mountain in a larger map

BANGOR, Maine — With his long beard and hair and brown flannel shirt, David Corrigan looks much more like the professional guide he is than a member of the bar, but the 33-year-old Concord Township man had a few F. Lee Bailey-ish moments on Wednesday.

Speaking during a Land Use Regulation Commission hearing at the Spectacular Event Center, Corrigan sharply questioned a scenic consultant and state wildlife officials about the impact of Champlain Wind’s proposed $136 million industrial wind site on 700 acres of eastern Maine’s Bowers Mountain.

Under Corrigan’s brisk cross-examination, Mark A. Caron, a regional biologist for the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, said that state surveys of migration patterns of the Canada lynx, which federal officials list as a threatened species, were somewhat lacking in the project’s proposed area.

But it was a cross-examination by attorney Juliet T. Browne, who represents Champlain, a subsidiary of Massachusetts-based First Wind, that might have helped Corrigan’s case against the project when her questions led to an admission from scenic consultant James Palmer that wildlife guides might lose customers if the project goes forward.

The guides, which could number as many as 50, might depend on customers for whom windmills pose more of a disruption to pristine woodlands than they do for most people, Palmer said.

“In that respect, I have to agree with Mr. Corrigan that they have more experience with their customers than I do,” said Palmer, who was hired to advise LURC on the project’s impact on the mountain area. “I don’t have any real knowledge of that particular gentleman user and whether he is shrinking rapidly [in numbers due to the presence of turbines] or static or whatever.”

“That would be information that would be nice to have, but we don’t,” Palmer added.

The 27-turbine project, on top of the 1,127-foot Bowers Mountain, would cover 700 acres and have a maximum energy output of 57 megawatts. The proposed project is about 10 miles east of Lee in Carroll Plantation in Penobscot County and Kossuth Township in Washington County and is within the area designated by Maine for expedited permitting.

The wind project is the latest of several operating, under construction or proposed in Maine. An industry group, Wind Power for Maine, says 195 turbines have been constructed or are under contract in Maine.

Groups opposed to large-scale wind projects argue that the projects disrupt wildlife and have adverse effects upon residents and the natural settings in which they are built. They typically generate too small a fraction of their capacity and require too much federal and state funding to be worth building, the critics contend.

Proponents argue that wind projects are ecofriendly producers of pollution-free electricity that aid their local economies with the electricity and jobs they generate while helping in a small way to offset the national dependence upon foreign oil.

Wednesday’s hearing provided grist for both positions. Corrigan noted that he and dozens of other professional guides told LURC at a public hearing in Lincoln on June 27 that they would lose a substantial portion of their business if the project is approved.

Browne drew out of Palmer survey information which showed that people who use the lakes in the mountain area felt the project would have a negligible impact on them. Studies on other wind turbine areas showed no indication of the collapse of recreational use within them — that the visibility of turbines was irrelevant to the areas’ use, Palmer said.

Caron conceded to Corrigan that DIF&W had concentrated its surveys of Canada lynx activity well north of the proposed site and on the possibility that lynx are crossing through the area to get to lands south. Caron found little relevance in that, however.

“I don’t see where this project would be a barrier to the movements of a terrestrial animal that is capable of movements of hundreds of miles,” Caron said.

After the hearing, he said that his agency has limited resources and concentrates its surveys in areas where Canada lynx are more numerous and scientists are more likely to learn from them.

LURC’s review of the project continues.

************************************* 
Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views: 126

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by alice mckay barnett on July 9, 2011 at 11:03am
Thank You again David

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

© 2019   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service