LURC members favor rejection of wind farm

Posted Oct. 20, 2011, at 9:01 p.m.
Last modified Oct. 20, 2011, at 9:53 p.m.
Print this   E-mail this    Facebook this   Tweet this 

Critics of Maine’s fast-growing commercial wind power sector were claiming victory on Thursday, one day after state regulators took a first step toward denying an application for a 27-turbine wind farm northwest of Grand Lake Stream.

The latest project from Massachusetts-based First Wind, the Bowers Mountain wind farm is proposed for a rural, sparsely populated area east of Springfield on the border of Penobscot and Washington counties.

But the project has run afoul with some registered Maine Guides, sporting camp owners and residents concerned about how the large turbines would affect views from the lakes, ponds and streams that draw fishermen, hunters and tourists to the region.

On Wednesday, members of the Land Use Regulation Commission directed its staff to write an order denying First Wind’s application because of the project’s potential for “unreasonable adverse impacts on scenic resources” in the area. The commission is expected to review and vote on the order in December.

Catherine Carroll, LURC’s staff director, said the project met the commission’s other criteria for approval of wind energy projects. But Carroll pointed out that it only takes one failed criterion to reject a project.

Project opponents cheered the commission’s vote, even if it was only preliminary.

“By denying this permit, LURC will send a strong message to wind developers that while former Governor Baldacci’s flawed wind [energy] law provides them with an expedited permitting process, it does not guarantee approval,” Kevin Gurall, president of the 200-plus member Partnership for the Preservation of the Downeast Lakes Watershed, said in a statement.

“There are sites within the expedited wind permitting area that are simply not appropriate for industrial wind development and the Downeast Lakes region is one of them,” Gurall said.

First Wind officials and project supporters, meanwhile, said rejection of the Bowers Mountain wind farm would rob the region of a $136 million project that would create much-needed construction jobs and return money to local communities. And a representative also indicated that the company was not giving up on the project.

“We think this is a good project and the benefits are clear,” said First Wind’s Matt Kearns. “I think there will be a lot of disappointment if this project did not go forward, so we are focused on re-evaluating our options with this project.”

Plans for the Bowers Mountain project call for 19 turbines to be constructed in Carroll Plantation and eight in Kossuth Township. The turbines — standing up to 428 feet tall from base to blade tip — could generate up to 69 megawatts of energy if operating at maximum capacity.

The facility would be built on commercial timberland and would use existing access roads, although additional road construction would be required.

Anita Duerr, who has served as Carroll Plantation’s assessor for more than 30 years, said her community stood to receive $92,000 a year for the next 20 years under the “tangible benefits” package negotiated with First Wind. Additionally, the company projected that the plantation’s mill rate would drop from roughly 14 mills to 2 mills initially and then go to 6 mills the next year.

Duerr said in all of LURC’s discussion about scenic impacts on Wednesday, no one considered how a denial would affect the rural communities hoping to benefit from the project.

“Our mill rate would drop considerably, the tangible benefits package was very generous and we, as a small plantation, have struggled just to maintain what we have here,” Duerr said.

The Bowers Mountain project has received far less attention than some of Maine’s other proposed wind farms, including several others sought by First Wind. But the project’s location within eight miles of at least eight lakes and ponds — some considered “outstanding” natural resources by the state — complicated matters for regulators.

Commissioners had less latitude to consider the proposed wind farm’s impacts on the landscape from a scenic standpoint because the project site is located within an “expedited permitting area,” a zone predetermined by the Legislature to be appropriate for wind power development.

But the expedited permitting law still allows the commission to consider scenic impacts on resources “of state or national significance” as well as how the wind farm could affect public use of a lake, pond or area.

In a statement, the organization Friends of Maine’s Mountains, which is sharply critical of commercial wind power development, said Wednesday’s vote suggested that efforts by its group and others appear to be paying off.

But earlier this month, First Wind received unanimous approval from LURC for a 19-turbine wind energy facility proposed for Township 16 MD near Eastbrook in rural Hancock County.

And despite Wednesday’s unanimous vote, the Bowers Mountain project did have some support on the commission. At least two of seven commissioners — Toby Hammond and Sally Farrand — indicated they favored the overall project but ultimately voted with the will of the majority.

Further complicating matters, the term of one commissioner who voted to deny the Bowers Mountain application — Rebecca Kurtz — will expire before the December meeting. Neither of the two new members were on the commission during the detailed public hearings and work sessions and one already has recused himself from the deliberations.

State statutes would require at least four affirmative votes to approve the permit.

 

http://bangordailynews.com/2011/10/20/news/penobscot/lurc-members-f...

******************************* 

Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

Views: 79

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Gary Campbell on October 21, 2011 at 11:13am

Does anyone have figures for what other towns were able to negotiate with FW? I hear that $4842 per turbine per year is unusually low. I suspect Carrol Plt got bamboozled.

"Anita Duerr, who has served as Carroll Plantation’s assessor for more than 30 years, said her community stood to receive $92,000 a year for the next 20 years under the “tangible benefits” package negotiated with First Wind."

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT (excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010  http://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?"  http://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” http://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

© 2014   Created by Eben Thurston.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service