HEAT PUMPS OVERSOLD BY EFFICIENCY VERMONT AND EV-APPROVED CONTRACTORS

Matt Cota, executive director of the Vermont Fuel Dealers Association testified: “Cold-climate heat pumps are inadequate during the colder days in winter. Many households with heat pumps found they could not adequately heat their houses. They had to turn off the heat pumps, which are very inefficient in cold weather, and turn on their oil and propane stoves or their wood stoves.”

 

Since about 2010, Efficiency Vermont and VPIRG have been extolling the virtues of cold-climate heat pumps, mostly made in Japan. By end 2017, about 18000 were installed at a turnkey average cost of about $4500. Most houses need two units.

 

Based on an average life of 15 years, the annual cost is 2 x 4700/15 = $627/y (simple payback basis), neglecting any interest or returns on invested funds and subsidies. The Vermont target is to have 200,000 installed by 2050. Vermont has about 330,000 households.

Heat Pump Example in Valley News Article of March 30, 2018

 

An engineer had installed one cold-climate heat pump at $4655 in 2013, which underperforms during colder weather. Because it is likely the engineer had an average insulated/sealed house, he had to switch to his existing fuel oil system at about 15 F, because his cost of operating the heat pumps would have been greater than using fuel oil. The heat pumps became less efficient at lower temperatures and did not deliver enough heat to his house.

 

Now he has two heating systems:

1) One heat pump at $4655, or 388/y (12-y simple payback), doing the light-duty work, mostly during spring and fall, and

2) An existing fuel oil system at $10,000, doing the heavy-duty work at all other times, when it is colder than 15 F.

 

His average energy saving, due to electricity partially displacing oil, was $400/y (2013- 2016). The heat pump has maintenance, replacements and service contract costs. He is barely breaking even. All this means, only the most energy-efficient houses are candidates for heat pumps.

 

NOTE: The coefficient of performance, COP = (Btu/h extracted from the outdoors)/(Btu/h to heat pump system, as electricity). The COP decreases as outdoor temperatures decrease. Would you like to electrically heat your house, when the COP is about 1.2 at minus 5 F?

 

Installing Heat Pumps

 

It would be foolish to claim to have an energy-efficient house, call an EV-approved contractor to get the subsidies, and say please install heat pumps. Some verifying and testing is required, as otherwise one may be in for a frigid surprise on cold days.

 

Energy-efficient houses could be candidates for heat pumps, after successful results from:

 

1) Blower door test to determine existing leakage rate, ft3/h, based on existing conditions.

2) Analysis of three years of heating bills to determine the effectiveness of existing insulation and sealing.

3) Calculated heating demand reduction from sealing, additional insulation, and from replacement of windows and doors.

4) Blower door test to determine new leakage rate, ft3/h, after sealing upgrades.

The Vermont Heat Pump Promotion Troika

 

GMP: Kristin Carlson, GMP's vice president for strategic and external affairs, said in an email that the utility has now installed 1,125 heat pumps. GMP arranges for the installation with a contractor. The heat pump brand and model is chosen by the contractor; installed brands include Daikin, Fujitsu, and Mitsubishi, with outputs ranging from 9,000 Btu/h to 18,000 Btu/h. Loan interest rate is 10.74%/y Usury rate?

 

1) GMP says that payments will range from $49 to $81 per month, depending on the model of heat pump that's installed. At $49 a month, a homeowner would end up paying $8,820 for a single-head minisplit over the 180-month payback period; at $81, a homeowner would pay a total of $14,580. That doesn't include the electricity required to run the unit.

 

Should a homeowner sell the house before the loan is repaid, GMP says it can offer a buy-out price for the heat pump, or the new owner could pick up the payments.

http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/green-building-news/...

 

2) Efficiency Vermont: According to a fact sheet at Efficiency Vermont, a homeowner would save $1,842/y by shifting 80% of the heating load away from electric resistance heat to a cold-climate heat pump. Propane users would save $1,268/y, and those with oil heat would save $865/y. The fact sheet at Efficiency Vermont is no longer accessible!
http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/green-building-news/...

 

3) VPIRG: VPIRG, a lobby organization and booster of renewable energy, mostly financed by Vermont RE businesses, estimated the annual savings at $1000 to $1500 per year on a $3000 household heating bill.

 

People Complaining About Less than Promised Savings: It is likely many heat pumps were installed in houses with average insulation and sealing. It is likely people complained about less than promised savings. As a result the VT-DPS made a survey and wrote a report. From the VT-DPS report:

  1. Overall dollar savings are impacted by the efficiency of the back‐up fossil fuel system. The higher the efficiency of the back-up system, the smaller the amount of fuel is being displaced by the heat pump.
  2. Houses with poor insulation levels and air leaks will not get as much benefit out of a heat pump, as will highly sealed, well- insulated houses.
  3. It is unlikely a heat pump by itself would be sufficient to heat a typical house, without use of a traditional heating system as a backup on cold days.

http://publicservice.vermont.gov/sites/dps/files/documents/Energy_E...

 

For the annual saving to be only $200/y, most of the houses had to have poor insulation and sealing. EV and its approved contractors likely did not properly survey those houses and did not give proper warning to those households. They likely were eager to install as many heat pumps as possible.

 

Vermont has very few highly energy-efficient houses, likely at most 10% of all houses. Only those houses are candidates for heat pumps. The articles in the media describing the benefits of heat pumps in glowing terms usually are regarding those houses.

 

There likely would be another 15% of houses that could be upgraded to be highly energy efficient, at a cost of at least $20,000 each, which likely would make them candidates for heat pumps.

 

The rest of the houses (75%) are “energy hogs” regarding heat pumps, because the heat output of the heat pumps would be insufficient for those houses on cold days, say 20 F and below. It would be too expensive to upgrade those houses for heat pumps.

 

Thus it appears, the above installation targets and the estimated annual savings of the above troika are highly optimistic, i.e., fantasies based on wishful dreaming.

Highly Energy-Efficient Houses

About 10 percent of all houses in Vermont are highly energy-efficient houses. Air-source* heat pumps, if of sufficient capacity (they should be sized for the heating demand for worst conditions, i.e., cold days), can extract enough heat from the cold outdoor air to heat those houses, without having to turn on propane furnaces, oil furnaces, and wood stoves.

* Ground-source heat pumps, use the soil to extract heat. The soil temperature is a near-constant 50 F throughout the year, at about 6 ft below grade, ideal for the highly efficient operation of heat pumps. Such heat pump systems should be installed when an energy-efficient house (very well insulated and sealed) is built. Such a house could have heated floors using 100 F water. It would need a whole-house ventilation system to ensure at least 0.5 air changes per hour to each room.

 

Average Energy-Efficient and Energy-Hog Houses

About 90 percent of all houses in Vermont are average energy-efficient and energy-hog houses. If such houses have air-source heat pumps (turnkey cost about $4000/heat pump), their owners, likely to their surprise and dismay, have to turn on their propane furnaces, oil furnaces, and wood stoves to keep warm during cold days in winter, because air-source heat pumps cannot extract enough heat from the cold outdoor air to heat their houses.

 

These houses are not candidates for heat pumps, unless very significant energy efficiency upgrades are made, which usually are very costly. The uninformed and misinformed owners, who installed air-source heat pumps anyway, likely got caught into the trap of “save the world” mantras, promoted by:

 

1) Efficiency Vermont, a quasi-government entity, spending about $70 million per year. By means of clever PR, glossy reports, etc., EV has managed to convinced lay people, the DPS, PUC, and many legislators, heat pumps will save them money, etc.

 

2) VPIRG, a lobby organization and booster of renewable energy, mostly financed by Vermont RE businesses.

 

2) Installation contractors, approved by Efficiency Vermont. EV does not pay a subsidy to the homeowner, unless EV-approved contractors, who usually charge higher prices than normal, install the heat pumps.

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/efficiency-vermont

Statewide Energy Code for Housing and Other Buildings 

Vermont (and NE) must have a statewide code to require zero energy or energy surplus housing and other buildings. Without such a code, there is no hope of ever reducing CO2 per CEP by 2050.

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/vermont-far-from-meetin...

People do not realize, California has Duck curves because housing and other buildings are so poorly insulated and sealed.

 

Instead of each building storing the excess electricity in batteries or in thermal hot water tanks, it is dumped into the grid. Other generators have to rapidly and inefficiently ramp down as the sun progresses.

 

In the evening, with solar disappearing, these generators have to rapidly and inefficiently ramp up to serve late afternoon/early evening peak demand. 

 

The result is chaos. California has put the brakes on installing new solar.

 

The fact the California Duck curve has been getting worse each year, indicates California has been doing practically nothing regarding buildings.

 

Energy surplus buildings, that store electrical and thermal energy, and have enough electricity left over to charge plug-ins, have to be built by the thousands in Vermont each year, to replace about 75% of buildings that basically are energy hogs.

APPENDIX 1

Requirements for a 2000 sq. ft. House to be “Off-the-Grid”

 

The house envelope must be insulated (roof R-60, walls R-40, basement R-20, windows R-6, doors R-10) and sealed (0.6 air changes per hour, or less, during a blower door test @ 50 pascal, about Passivhaus level), to minimize energy requirements for heating, cooling and electricity. Heating and cooling would be with air-source or geothermal source heat pumps.

- One ACH for a 2000 ft^2 house is 16000 ft^3, excluding the basement.

 

NOTE: Typical NE houses, 10 to 20 years old, have leakage rates of 3 - 5 ACH @ 50 pascal, and would be totally unsuitable for space heating with heat pumps. Yet, installation contractors, approved by Efficiency Vermont, and eager to make a buck, persuade homeowners to install heat pumps anyway. Homeowners have no idea they likely will have inadequately heated houses during colder winter days.

http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/blower-door-...

 

All this adds about 10% to the house envelope capital cost for air-source heat pumps, about 15% for geothermal source heat pumps. Land, sitework, septic, well, etc., are not part of the house envelope. 

 

The appliances must be high-efficiency and programmable to manage the household daily demand curve according to the weather. For example, the washer/dryer would be operated during sunny periods, not during cloudy/rainy/snowy periods; LED lights would go on/off upon entering/leaving a room. Here is a daily demand curve for a typical household.

https://topromotetheprogress.wordpress.com/2014/11/23/smart-meters-...

 

The house would be oriented to solar south and have:

- A roof-mounted solar system, 10 kW; production in Vermont, 12,500 kWh/y; turnkey capital cost $35,000

- 2 Tesla Powerwall 2.0 battery units; AC to AC round-trip efficiency 90%; input 14.74 AC, stored 14 kWh DC, output 13.3 kWh AC; turnkey capital cost $16000.

https://dgit.com/tesla-powerwall-specs-price-battery-10214/

- A propane-fired generator, 3 - 5 kW, to top off batteries, as needed, mostly during winter; turnkey capital cost $1000.

- A well-insulated domestic, domestic hot water storage tank, 300-gallon, with 1) electric resistance heater and 2) propane-fired heater in the basement.

- Centrally located heat pump with air supply/return ducts for each room, 0.5 ACH.

In heating mode, the heat pump receives a mixture of 50% recirculated air and 50% pre-heated, filtered, fresh air and delivers warm air as needed. The preheating allows the heat pump to operate at a higher coefficient of performance, COP.

In cooling mode, the heat pump receives a mixture of 50% recirculated air and 50% pre-cooled, filtered, fresh air and delivers cool air as needed.

- Air-to-air heat recovery unit, efficiency 85%, to preheat incoming fresh air and ventilate stale air to the outdoors, located in air supply duct, upstream of heat pump.

- HEPA filter to reduce pollen, bacteria and spores, located in air supply duct, likely upstream of heat recovery unit.

- A back-up, thermostatically controlled electric heater, about 2 kW, for space heating, located in air supply duct, downstream of heat pump, in case of heat-pump failure.

 

Excess electricity could be used to heat an outdoor Jacuzzi, Sauna, or to top off the charge of a plug-in hybrid or EV, during the Spring, Summer and Fall.

 

APPENDIX 2

The actual stored energy in the Powerwall 2.0 is 14/0.70 = 20 kWh DC, because the unit is maximally charged up to 95% and minimally discharged down to 25%, i.e., 20/0.95 = 21.05 kWh AC enters the battery. The delivered 14 x 0.95 = 13.3 kWh AC depletes the battery by 14 kWh DC. The remaining charge, 20 - 14 = 6 kWh DC, stays in the battery.

 

APPENDIX 3

R = 1/U = delta t/heat flux = delta t/(energy rate/unit area)

R (US units) = F/{(Btu/h)/ft^2} = (F.ft^2)/(Btu/h) = (5/9 x 0.092903)/(1055.0556/3600) = 0.17611 K.m^2/W

RSI (SI units) = K/{(joule/s)/m^2} = K. m^2/(joule/s) = 1 K.m^2/W

RSI = 5.67826 x R

 

F = 5/9 K

ft^2 = 0.092903 m^2

Btu = 1055.0556 joule

W = J/s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-value_(insulation)

APPENDIX 4

Energy-Surplus Buildings and Plug-in Vehicles: Turning around the US building stock to energy-surplus buildings, and the vehicle stock towards plug-ins would take some decades.

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/evs-and-plug-in-hybrids...

 

Ideally, all residential and other buildings should be energy-surplus buildings, with:

 

1) Highly insulated and sealed.

2) Energy efficient systems and lighting.

3) Heat pumps for space heating and cooling and hot water.

4) Battery systems; store PV solar during midday, use in the evening

5) Thermal storage systems; store PV solar, use as needed

6) PV solar systems. 

 

Such buildings would:

 

1) Take a long time to warm up or cool down, i.e., the internal temperature would vary just a few degrees during a day, even though the outside temperature would vary 30 degrees or more.

2) Use minimal energy for heating, cooling and electricity (Btu/ft2/y)

3) Have enough electricity left over to charge plug-in vehicles at night.

 

Such a setup would greatly reduce the daily variation in electrical demand, and thus reduce the need for generating capacity, MW.

 

However, almost all of the building stock is very far from highly insulated and sealed, etc.: they are energy-hog buildings. Placing solar panels on the roofs of such buildings makes for good visuals, but creates grid disturbing duck curves, especially in California.

Views: 86

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

First Prize

NE Book Festival

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT (excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010  http://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?"  http://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” http://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

© 2018   Created by Eben Thurston.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service