Examples of Where Maine Environmental Groups Get Some of Their Funding

Whereas the groups of Mainers fighting wind power's destruction of the state's rural areas are but loosely knit ragtag groups of concerned citizens using their own scarce money and time to do battle, the environmental groups are a different story. These are highly organized groups with large staffs of salaried employees who are paid to fight those opposing wind. While certainly these groups receive contributions from well intentioned small donors, some of these groups may receive funding from larger organizations which seem to bundle money from other organizations. It can be very hard to follow.

One reason it's hard to follow the money is that when one looks at an organization's IRS Form 990 (officially, the "Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax"), often times it is not possible to learn who gave the organization money. As noted by the IRS an exempt organization, other than a private foundation, need not disclose the name and address of any contributor. However, it appears that there may be more stringent requirements for disclosing whom the organization gave money to. By looking at the 990's of these larger organizations, one may be able to see how the money flows downstream.

For example, looking at 990's, one learns that the Sea Change Foundation gave considerable money to the Energy Foundation. See:

Sea%20Change%20Foundation%20Form%20990%202015%20-%20Copy.pdf

Sea%20Change%20Foundation%20Form%20990%202014%20-%20Copy.pdf

Sea%20Change%20Foundation%20Form%20990%202013%20-%20Copy.pdf

Then, looking downstream at 990's for the Energy Foundation, one sees that they gave money to some groups familiar to Mainers opposing wind power such as Acadia Center, American Lung Assoc, Audubon, Conservation Law Foundation, Environment America, League of Conservation Voters, NRCM and Sierra Club Foundation. In many cases the 990 indicates that "the purpose of the grant or assistance" was to PROMOTE CLEAN ENERGY. Can we conclude that an organization way downstream in Maine who received money from the Energy Foundation effectively received Sea Change funds because Sea Change gave to the Energy Foundation? I don't know the answer to this, for I suppose it's always possible certain grants come with restrictions as to who the money can be given to. My suggestion would be to ask the Maine environmental groups. After all, these are the same folks who are able to tell you that an electron produced by the Stetson wind project and put into the grid somehow finds its way to Harvard University. Amazing stuff.

This sources and ultimate sources of funding are significant. For when you read an editorial written by the American Lung Association in a Maine newspaper calling for more wind power in Maine, it must be kept in mind that the organization has been paid to promote clean energy. This does not mean that the writer is not a true believer but it has to cause any reasonable person to question whether the piece would have been written at all had the organization not accepted money to push "clean energy". It should make a legislator on the EUT question whether environmental group pro-wind testimony is rendered because the testifier has a ludicrous belief that a wind turbine in Maine will stop the planet from burning or simply because wind money pays the bills.

Energy%20Foundation_2016_2016-943126848-0e9c1ee8-9%20-%20Copy.pdf

Energy%20Foundation%202015_2015-943126848-0d21cbda-9%20-%20Copy.pdf

Energy%20Foundation_Form990_2014%20-%20Copy.pdf

Some MAINE screenshot examples from Energy Foundation 990's. These are funds received from the Energy Foundation.

If a group had a name like "The Society to Push Wind", that would be OK. But when organizations use their reputations as protectors of Maine, at one time earned for valuable work, to testify for wind and are being paid to do this, it just doesn't feel quite right. It is in fact these groups who should be queried about their funding and ultimate funding sources, not the ragtag groups of citizens reaching into their own pockets and time.

Views: 208

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Stephen Littlefield on July 29, 2019 at 2:13pm

Take a look and see why the wind is a fraud buying "environmental" groups to get their support! Audubon should be trashed for their bought support, allowing birds of prey to be hacked to death by turbines and say nothing!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

© 2019   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service