Climate Initiatives Finally Hit Economic Reality..It is Over!

Blue States Set To Roll Back Expensive New Climate-Centered Energy Initiative as Rising Costs Start To Bite Taxpayers

New York’s governor, for one, is asking the state legislature to delay deadlines set seven years ago for capping pollution targets by 2030 and fining industries that exceed limits.
Governor Kathy Hochul at the Brooklyn Academy of Music on January 19, 2026.
Governor Kathy Hochul at the Brooklyn Academy of Music on January 19, 2026. Natasha Moustache/Getty Images

SHARON KEHNEMUI
SHARON KEHNEMUI
Published: Mar 23, 2026, 03:55 AM ET
Updated:Mar 23, 2026, 05:42 AM ET
With Iran’s blockade in the Strait of Hormuz capturing headlines about rising oil prices, regulators in a number of states are scaling back climate-related energy regulations, faulting housing costs and the Trump administration’s rollback of funding for clean energy projects for a shortage in fossil fuel alternatives.Even as several states introduce legislation requiring new climate change rules, New York’s governor Kathy Hochul is the latest chief executive to say she wants to put the brakes on clean energy emission mandates.  Instead, she is asking legislators to amend the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act to delay the 2030 deadline for capping certain pollution levels and charging corporations for exceeding emissions limits, and modify other targets set all the way out to 2050. “This is solely out of necessity — to protect New Yorkers’ pocketbooks and economy,” Ms. Hochul wrote in a piece published Friday by Empire Report.  “With energy demand growing and the state having retired far more fossil fuel plants than it’s been able to replace with renewable sources, our electric system operator is projecting potential energy shortages, particularly downstate, that could lead to brownouts and blackouts,” she said. “Put simply, something has to give.”Citing her clean energy record, Ms. Hochul said that during her administration the state and investors have dropped more than $88 billion into wind and solar energy projects, including offshore wind farms that President Trump halted by executive order issued nationwide last year. That stoppage, along with what Ms. Hochul described as “post-Covid inflation and supply chain disruptions,” has put the price of implementing the law’s restrictions too high for most New Yorkers. According to the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, under the new rules, it would cost the average upstate household that uses oil and natural gas to heat their homes $4,000 more per year while New York City residents would be forced to pay $2,300 more per year on average. Gas prices at the pump would also increase an additional $2.23 per gallon were the law to go into effect as scheduled.“As Governor, I can’t let that happen,” she wrote. Large corporate groups like trucking and restaurant associations have protested the rules, saying they can’t afford to operate under strict climate-change rules, and several reports show that older residents are increasingly behind on their utility bill payments.  The state’s supreme court had already ruled that New York  must proceed with its climate change targets, hence the request from the governor for the legislature to take action. But environmental activists have called Ms. Hochul’s request a betrayal, and a group of 29 state lawmakers say they “categorically oppose” any effort to pass legislation to halt the rollout. They argue that the Energy Research and Development Authority affordability paper cited by the governor uses a flawed cap and investment program design without “price guardrails.” New York’s clean energy problems are not isolated. Despite attorneys general from several Democratic-led states challenging the Environmental Protection Agency’s recent rollback of greenhouse gas emissions rules, with major housing shortages and rising manufacturing costs for clean-energy appliances, states that would normally champion energy efficiency regulations are grappling with unmanageable mandates. In California, where refineries are bailing, the state’s Air Resources Board has delayed until May issuing its final greenhouse gas disclosure rules by corporations doing more than $1 billion in business, including home builders, following a wave of public comment. After a Ninth Circuit Court injunction, the board announced it will not fine violators of a January 1, 2026, deadline to report climate risks emerging from doing business in the state.In Vermont, legislators last month effectively killed the state’s Clean Heat Standard by not overriding a veto by Governor Phil Scott to a 2024 bill that would have created a credit marketplace for homeowners to buy clean fuel. That led regulators to end rulemaking and close the initiative. Massachusetts delayed a similar requirement until at least 2028, citing the need to evaluate access to clean fuels and affordability of new heat pumps by homeowners.A February report by think tank E2  Energy+Environment found that for every dollar of new investment in clean energy in 2025, companies killed three dollars’ worth of projects, valued at roughly $34.8 billion, and 38,000 projects. Most are in Republican-led states, which voluntarily abandoned clean energy goals following the Trump administration’s elimination of federal requirements.Nonetheless, the Trump administration has shown support for some alternative energy investments, including geothermal, with the Department of Energy last month announcing $171 million in new funding for field tests on public lands. A white paper from an independent think tank, Center for Public Enterprise, says new permitting rules could reduce production times for getting geothermal sources online by up to 75 percent.As states grapple with the housing shortage and a strain on utility grids from growing demand, particularly by AI data centers, some localities are pushing forward with rules to reduce emissions that could further strain the housing market. The county council in Thurston County, Washington, for example, approved a rule last week that would require homeowners to obtain a “home energy score” — at a cost to the homeowner of up to $350 — before putting their properties on the market.

More from the New York Sun

Views: 11

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Willem Post 2 hours ago

NEW YORK STATE DYSFUNCTIONAL ENERGY POLICY

https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/new-york-state-dysfunctional-energy-policy

By Willem Post

.

People are brainwashed to love wind and solar. They do not know by how much they screw themselves by voting for the woke folks who push them onto everyone. Their ignorance is exploited by the woke folks
.

If owned/controlled by European governments and companies, would be a serious disadvantage for the US regarding environmental impact, national security, economic competitiveness, and sovereignty 

.
Western countries cajoling Third World countries into Wind/Solar and loaning them high-interest money to do so, will forever re-establish a colonial-style bondage on those recently free countries.

 

What is generally not known, the more weather-dependent W/S systems, the less efficient the traditional generators, as they inefficiently (more CO2/kWh) counteract the increasingly larger ups and downs of W/S output. See URL

https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/fuel-and-co2-reductions-due-to-wind-energy-less-than-claimed

.

W/S systems add great cost to the overall delivery of electricity to users; the more W/S systems, the higher the cost/kWh, as proven by the UK and Germany, with the highest electricity rates in Europe, and near-zero, real-growth GDP.

.

At about 30% W/S, the entire system hits an increasingly thicker concrete wall, operationally and cost wise.

The UK and Germany are hitting the wall, more and more hours each day.
The cost of electricity delivered to users increased with each additional W/S/B system

.

Nuclear, gas, coal and reservoir hydro plants are the only rational way forward.

Ignore CO2, because greater CO2 ppm in atmosphere is essential for: 1) increased green flora to increase fauna all over the world, and 2) increased crop yields to better feed 8 billion people.

.
Net-zero by 2050 to-reduce CO2 is a super-expensive suicide pact, to:

1) increase command/control by governments, and

2) enable the moneyed elites to become more powerful and richer, at the expense of all others, by using the foghorn of the government-subsidized/controlled Corporate Media to spread scare-mongering slogans and brainwash people, already for at least 50 years, extremely biased CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, NBC ABC, CBS come to mind.

.

Empire Wind

.

Owned by Norway, 810 MW; turnkey capital cost $5 Billion; Bank loans $3 Billion; Investors stake $2 Billion; Cost/kW = $5 Billion/810 MW = $6170/kW

 

New York State Utilities will pay foreign Owners 15.5 c/kWh for 20 to 25 years

New York State Utilities will mark this up before averaging it into their cost of purchased electricity.

Ratepayers and taxpayers are being screwed

.

Per various laws, the federal and state government will pay enough subsidies, so the foreign Owners can sell for 15.5 c/kWh, for 20 to 25 years, instead of 31 c/kWh, without any subsidies, such as:

.

1) Federal and state tax credits, up to 50% (Community tax credit of up to 10% – Federal tax credit of 30% - State tax credit and other incentives of up to 10%),

2) 5-y Accelerated Depreciation write off the entire project,

3) Loan interest deduction to reduce any taxable profits from whatever source.

Subsidies shift costs from project Owners to ratepayers, taxpayers, government debt

In general, utilities are forced to pay at least:

15 c/kWh, wholesale, after 50% subsidies, for electricity from fixed offshore wind systems

18 c/kWh, wholesale, after 50% subsidies, for electricity from floating offshore wind

.

Excluded costs, at a future 30% W/S annual penetration on the grid, based on UK and German experience: 

- Onshore grid expansion/reinforcement to connect far-flung W/S systems, about 2 c/kWh

- A fleet of traditional power plants to quickly counteract W/S variable output, on a less than minute-by-minute basis, 24/7/365, which means more Btu/kWh, more CO2/kWh, more cost of about 2 c/kWh

- A fleet of traditional power plants to provide electricity during 1) low-wind periods, 2) high-wind periods, when rotors are locked in place, and 3) low solar periods during mornings, evenings, at night, snow/ice on panels, which means more Btu/kWh, more CO2/kWh, more cost of about 2 c/kWh

- Pay W/S system Owners for electricity they could have produced, if not curtailed, about 1 c/kWh

- Importing electricity at high prices, when W/S output is low, 1 c/kWh

- Exporting electricity at low prices, when W/S output is high, 1 c/kWh

- Disassembly on land and at sea, reprocessing and storing at hazardous waste sites, about 2 c/kWh

Total ADDER 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 = 11 c/kWh

Some of these values exponentially increase as more W/S systems are added to the grid

.

Offshore wind full cost of electricity FCOE = 30 c/kWh + 11 c/kWh = 41 c/kWh, no subsidies

Offshore wind full cost of electricity FCOE = 15 c/kWh + 11 c/kWh = 26 c/kWh, 50% subsidies

The 11 c/kWh is for various measures required by wind and solar. Power plant to landfill cost basis.

This compares with 7 c/kWh + 3 c/kWh = 10 c/kWh from gas, coal, nuclear, large reservoir hydro plants.
.
The economic/financial insanity and environmental damage of it all is off the charts.
No wonder Europe’s near-zero, real-growth economy is in de-growth mode.

That economy has been tied into knots by inane people.

YOUR tax dollars are building these projects so YOU will have much higher electric bills.

Remove YOUR tax dollars using your vote, and none of these projects would be built, and YOUR electric bills would be lower.

Comment by Willem Post 3 hours ago

New York State Socialist, leftist, Democrat, woke, entrenched bureaucrats are finally forced to throw in the towel, because they ran out of other people’s money for their inanely expensive wind, solar, battery idiocies.

Utilities would be forced to buy from foreign owners at 15.5 c/kWh, for 20 years, after their Offshore wind projects receive 50% government subsidies, plus about 11 c/kWh for other a to z costs, that would be passed onto users in the form of hidden charges.

California will be next.

This whole “climate” mania is collapsing like a deck of cards

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain 3 hours ago

White House AI Framework Pushes Age Verification ID Mandate

The only tools platforms have are identity-based checks, government IDs, biometric scans, credit card data, and third-party verification services, or biometric estimation. 

There’s also the chilling effect that age verification creates before anyone’s data leaks. Anonymous and pseudonymous speech has always been part of how people participate in political life online.

Many of the world’s internet users live in countries where people have been arrested or imprisoned for posting content about political or social issues

https://www.infowars.com/posts/white-house-ai-framework-pushes-age-...

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2026   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service