Guest Post from the Institute for Energy Research. Less than a month before Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey faces reelection, she has called for an energy emergency, issuing an executive order to temporarily reduce electric bills and expand home heating aid ahead of the winter season. She claims her slate of changes and payouts could save residents tens of millions of dollars in heating costs this winter. She has also asked the Trump administration to expedite approval of a gas pipeline expansion that would save $40 million in annual costs, but she has called for a thorough environmental review first. These actions are occurring despite her frequent statements against natural gas pipelines during her tenure as attorney general. Healey’s Energy Emergency Actions Healey’s current proposal follows her administration’s earlier efforts to overhaul utility buying practices and temporarily suspend the state gas tax. Yet Massachusetts residents pay about twice the national average for electricity and face a winter of high energy bills. The state’s initiatives, approved by Healey and noted below, are projected to cut aggregate heating costs for state residents by tens of millions of dollars.
This collaborative effort with Citizens Energy Corporation, known as the Emergency Winter Warmth Fund, will operate from November 1, 2026, through April 30, 2027. Gas Pipeline Expansion Governor Healey asked the Trump administration to expedite its review of a natural gas pipeline expansion project in New England. She sent a letter to U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, urging federal regulators to move as quickly as possible to assess the Reliable Affordable Resilient Enhancement proposal — known as Project RARE. The project, proposed by Enbridge, involves installing wider pipes along sections of the Algonquin natural gas pipeline that brings natural gas from New Jersey through southern New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and into Massachusetts. Haeley claims the project will lower costs for 600,000 customers, saving customers about $40 million annually by replacing LNG with pipeline gas. Earlier this year, the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities approvedEversource’s plan to purchase gas from the Project RARE expansion for 10 years. New England, and Massachusetts in particular, has some of the country’s most expensive energy prices because of constraints and policies the state government has imposed. The state has fought new natural gas pipelines, so it must rely on imported, higher-priced LNG during periods of high home heating demand. On cold winter days, pipeline constraints force many gas power plants to burn more expensive oil. If federal regulators approve Project RARE, Enbridge would replace about eight miles of existing pipelines with larger-diameter pipes in parts of Massachusetts and Rhode Island and run a secondary pipeline along a segment in Rhode Island. The company would also upgrade a compressor station in Cromwell, Connecticut. The project is planned to be in service in2028. The 1,100-mile Algonquin pipeline is one of three large interstate pipelines that bring gas into Massachusetts, moving more than 3 billion cubic feet of gas per day. The expansion would increase that by about 75 million cubic feet per day, potentially bringing a substantial amount of natural gas into a part of Massachusetts where supply is very tight. The deal is not a cure-all; it cannot solve the region’s energy affordability issue on its own, but it will help meet winter demand from natural gas customers in southeastern Massachusetts and reduce reliance on higher-cost, foreign LNG. Reducing utilities’ reliance on LNG should save ratepayers money and reduce emissions since pipeline gas has a lower carbon footprint than LNG. Healey’s actions, however, do not align with state policy, as Massachusetts has legally binding requirements to cut carbon dioxide emissions—targets that require reducing the use of natural gas. In 2015, Healey’s office released a study that she said showed the state did not need more gas pipeline capacity to keep its power grid reliable. As attorney general, Healey sued ExxonMobil in October 2019, accusing the company of deceiving Massachusetts consumers and investors about climate change. Her dilemma is that high energy prices concern residents. About half of New England’s power comes from natural gas, and Massachusetts residents pay about twice the national average for electricity, despite being close to huge deposits in Pennsylvania. About a decade ago, when Healey was attorney general, she opposed two proposed pipeline expansion projects in the state. The state was more comfortable importing LNG from foreign sources, including Russia, than allowing pipelines. More recently, Healey is trying to justify her actions by saying her “all-of-the-above” approach to energy—which includes support for Project RARE—is not an about-face, but consistent with her position that she supports projects that save ratepayers money and opposes those that do not. Healey urged the federal government to move quickly.“ Moving quickly does not mean cutting corners” on any environmental review or community engagement efforts, she said. “Thorough and timely review are not competing goals,” she wrote. Project Beacon Enbridge has proposed a second pipeline expansion project on the Algonquin pipeline. Like Project RARE, Project Beacon would involve building alongside existing pipelines and adding larger diameter pipes. Enbridge estimates it would increase pipeline capacity by about 10%, much more than RARE, with service possibly starting in 2030. Project Beacon is still early in development, and Enbridge has not submitted a proposal for federal review. A study recently released by the Fiscal Alliance Foundation, a nonprofit affiliated with the conservative Mass Fiscal Alliance, found that Project Beacon could save utility gas customers in the state about $76 each winter. Healey has not yet said whether she supports this project. But in her letter to the energy secretary, she wrote that “on several occasions” the two have discussed their “mutual desire to get more U.S. gas into New England.” She went on to mention Project Beacon, noting, “there may be more opportunities ahead,” as she is looking to advance gas expansion projects when they can lower energy bills. In an email, Maria Hardiman, a spokeswoman for the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, said the administration has urged power plant owners in the state to explore contracts that could advance Project Beacon. “In order for Project Beacon to move forward, the utilities and power generators need to sign contracts with the pipeline developer,” Hardiman said. Conclusion Massachusetts Governor Healey issued an energy emergency due to high power and heating costs across the state—much of which is driven by state policies. Massachusetts residents pay very high energy costs because the state has limited energy production and is unwilling to site energy infrastructure. Healey issued an executive order that includes payouts and temporarily removes a surcharge on electric bills to support solar development across the state. She has also asked the Trump administration to expedite approval for a natural gas pipeline expansion project, Project RARE, while ensuring a thorough environmental review. Project RARE is estimated to save consumers $40 million annually and is expected to be in service by 2028. That project may be followed by another pipeline expansion project, Project Beacon, with a projected in-service date of 2030. Healey is pursuing natural gas pipeline projects despite blocking gas pipeline projects when she was Attorney General, indicating then that they were not needed. |
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2026 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine