Wisconsin Electors and 16 Other States Election Results WERE Fraudulent -Felonies Committed-2020 Election Was Fraudulent!

On just one issue alone, that of Voting Machine Integrity, J. Alex Halderman Report( Professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Michigan-), Proof Exists of Illegal Vote Active Fraud!

Halderman Report was Suppressed ! 

Just Tell other State AGs to GET THE REPORT!

Then there are SO many more  illegalities in the Supreme Court Complaint...READ IT PLEASE .Spread the Word!

See the Supreme Court Complaint!

Write your State Attorney General to join it.


Full Report Downloadable here and at http://www.Frankspeech.com

BOMBSHELL DOMINION REPORT SUPPRESSED — Professor J Alex Halderman’s 25,000 Word Dominion Hacking Report Hidden Under Seal in GA

see states-v-us-and-states-compl-2021-11-23.pdf


Share some truth!

GEORGIA 10/7/21 — GA Lawyer Kurt Olsen joined Bannon’s War Room today to discuss the massive election hacking report that is being suppressed by a GA judge. Shortly after the 2016 election in 2017, Computer Science and Engineering Professor, J. Alex Halderman, made a presentation to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence about the woefully inadequate cyber security of our elections. He has recently submitted a 25 thousand word report in an ongoing GA lawsuit, Donna Curling vs. Brad Raffensperger, regarding the 2020 election. Judge Amy Totenberg, who previously ruled the Dominion machines wer..., has put the report under seal. The professor has asked the judge to release the report to CISA for national security especially because it shows how Dominion may be hacked switch votes remotely. This report likely confirms the types of hacking that Mike Lindell has been working to expose ever since the first reports of Dominion electronic voting machine issues in M....

“Our highly computerized election infrastructure is vulnerable to sabotage and even to cyber attacks that can change votes. These realities risk making our election results more difficult for the American People to trust. I know America’s voting machines are vulnerable, because my colleagues and I have hacked them, repeatedly, as part of a decade of research studying the technology that operates elections and learning how to make it stronger.

We’ve created attacks that can spread from machine to machine like a computer virus and silently change election outcomes. We’ve studied touch screen and optical scan systems, and in every single case we found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. These capabilities are certainly within reach for America’s enemies.

As you know states choose their own voting technology, and while some states are doing well with security, others are alarmingly vulnerable. This puts the entire nation at risk. In close elections an attacker can probe the most important swing states with swing counties. Find areas with the weakest protections and strike there. In a close election year changing a few votes in key localities could be enough to tip national results. The key lesson from 2016 is that these threats are real.”

Senator Jim Risch: “If you were sitting in Russia right now and wanted to do the same thing that you had done, would that ability be dependent upon the machines, or whatever system is used, being connected to the Internet?”

“That ability would depend on whether pieces of election IT equipment, IT offices where the election programming is prepared, are ever connected to the Internet. The machines themselves don’t have to be directly connected to the Internet for a remote attacker to target them.”

Professor J. Alex Halderman senate testimony on Bannon’s War Room

Professor J Alex Halderman’s Expert Rebuttal Declaration

“In my report—a 25,000-word document that is the product of twelve weeks of intensive testing of the Dominion equipment provided by Fulton County—I find that Georgia’s BMDs contains multiple severe security flaws. Attackers could exploit these flaws to install malicious software, either with temporary physical access (such as that of voters in the polling place) or remotely from election management systems. I explain in detail how such malware, once installed, could alter voters’ votes while subverting all the procedural protections practiced by the State, including acceptance testing, hash validation, logic and accuracy testing, external firmware validation, and risk-limiting audits (RLAs). Finally, I describe working proof-of-concept malware that I am prepared to demonstrate in court.”

“My report concludes, inter alia, that Georgia’s BMDs are not sufficiently secured against technical compromise to withstand vote-altering attacks by bad actors who are likely to target future elections in the state; that the BMDs’ vulnerabilities compromise the auditability of Georgia’s paper ballots; that the BMDs can be compromised to the same extent as or more easily than the DREs they replaced; and that using these vulnerable BMDs for all in-person voters, as Georgia does, greatly magnifies the level of security risk compared to using hand-marked paper ballots and providing BMDs to voters who need or request them.”

Professor J Alex Halderman’s Expert Rebuttal Declaration

Judge Seals Report on Voting Machine Vulnerability


A judge in a Georgia election security lawsuit is working to tamp down voting machine conspiracy theories. But sealing a court file could stoke the controversy even more.

Views: 194


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Penny Gray on December 1, 2021 at 5:11pm

Is it legal to require poll workers to be fully vaccinated but not require all voters to be fully vaccinated?

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on December 1, 2021 at 10:37am

HUGE: Election Poll Worker Turnout for Republicans in Dane County Wisconsin Up from 41 Last Election to 318 For Next Election


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."


© 2022   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service