Wind is Dead -Offshore Projects Cancelled

Two Offshore Wind Projects Agree to End Leases, Invest in Fossil Fuels

The projects’ owners agree not to invest in any new U.S. offshore wind projects in the future.
Two Offshore Wind Projects Agree to End Leases, Invest in Fossil Fuels

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum testifies during a Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Department of Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies hearing on the proposed budget for fiscal year 2027 on Capitol Hill in Washington, on April 22, 2026. Mariam Zuhaib/AP Photo


4/27/2026|Updated: 4/27/2026

Two offshore wind developers have pulled plans to build offshore wind farms and will instead invest in domestic energy projects in an agreement announced by the U.S. Department of the Interior April 27.

Bluepoint Wind project, planned off the coast of New York, and Golden State Wind project, to be installed off the California coast, have ended their federal leases for projects that the Trump administration said would have been costly for taxpayers.

“The companies that bid for these offshore wind leases were basically sold a product in 2022 that was only viable when propped up by massive taxpayer subsidies,” Interior Secretary Doug Bergum said in a statement. “Now that hardworking Americans are no longer footing the bill for expensive, unreliable, intermittent energy projects, companies are once again investing in affordable, reliable, secure energy infrastructure.”

Story continues below advertisement

The agreements also “resolve the unaddressed national security concerns at both projects,” Bergum said.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called the cancellation of the wind farms “despicable.”

“Another attack on New York offshore wind by Trump,” Schumer said in a post on Facebook. “These projects would have delivered desperately needed cheaper, cleaner energy to our homes and small businesses. All this does is kill good-paying union jobs and send energy prices even higher. Despicable.”

The U.S. paused offshore wind projects under construction in December 2025 to address emerging national security risks identified by the Department of War. The concerns included the creation of radar interference called “clutter” caused by the massive turbine blades that Burgum said could cause actual targets to be missed.

Offshore wind projects emit vibrations, electromagnetic fields, and acoustic signals that can travel long distances and possibly interfere with underwater threat detection, and introduce new vulnerabilities to the electrical grid, according to the Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Bluepoint Wind project was in the early development stages and was expected to power over 1 million homes. It was promoted as a way to help New York and New Jersey meet their carbon emissions reduction goals by 2030.

Global Infrastructure Partners, a part of BlackRock, has now committed to invest up to $765 million, the bid amount for Bluepoint Wind, in a U.S.-based liquified natural gas (LNG) facility.

The Department of Interior will cancel the lease and reimburse the bid payment in the amount invested in the LNG project, according to the department.

Bluepoint Wind has also decided not to invest in any new offshore wind projects in the United States, according to the agreement.

The Golden State Wind project was planned for the Morro Bay Wind Energy Area off of California’s central coast. By voluntarily ending its offshore wind lease, the project will be eligible to recover about $120 million in lease fees after its owners invest an equal amount in the development of U.S. oil and gas assets, energy infrastructure, or LNG projects along the Gulf Coast.

Wind turbines generate electricity at the Block Island Wind Farm near Block Island, R.I., on July 7, 2022. (John Moore/Getty Images)
Wind turbines generate electricity at the Block Island Wind Farm near Block Island, R.I., on July 7, 2022. John Moore/Getty Images


The California project’s owners decided not to pursue any new offshore wind project in the United States, according to the Department of Interior.

“Our priority remains [in] disciplined capital allocation and delivering reliable energy solutions that create long-term value for ratepayers, partners, and shareholders,” Michael Brown, CEO of Ocean Winds North America, a 50 percent owner of Bluepoint Wind and Golden State Wind, said in a stateme


Views: 1

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2026   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service