US SUPREME COURT RULING ON ARIZONA VOTING LAW REVISIONS

“The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a recent Arizona voting law that placed restrictions on absentee voting and ballot harvesting.”
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-1257_g204.pdf

The court, in a 6-3 opinion, written by Justice Samuel Alito, ruled:

1) Arizona’s revised election law was on solid ground to disallow votes cast in the wrong precinct, i.e., the revised Arizona election law required people to vote ONLY IN THEIR PRECINCT.

Arizona law generally makes it very easy to vote. Voters may cast their ballots on election day,

1) In person at a traditional precinct, or
2) At a “voting center” in their county of residence

Arizonans also may cast:

1) An “early ballot” by mail up to 27 days before an election, and
2) A vote in person at an early voting location in each county

Arizonans, who vote in person on election day in a county that uses the precinct system, must vote in the precinct to which they are assigned, based on their VALID PHYSICAL address, i.e., not a PO Box, a warehouse, a parking lot, etc.

If a voter votes in the wrong precinct, the vote is not counted.

2) Arizona’s revised election law was on solid legal ground in enforcing rules that prohibit THIRD PARTIES from collecting mail-in ballots, aka BALLOT HARVESTING.

For Arizonans, who vote early by mail, it a crime to knowingly collect an early ballot— either before or after it has been completed, by any person, other than:

1) A postal worker
2) An election official
3) A voter’s caregiver
4) Family member
5) Household member

NOTE: Vermont election law, ENCOURAGES/ALLOWS ballot harvesting by THIRD PARTIES, such as the VPIRG. That law has become unconstitutional, per US Supreme Court ruling.

I agree with the very reasonable/prudent SCOTUS opinion.

NOTE:


I wonder how SCOTUS would prevent LARGE-SCALE fraudulent operations, such as:

– Completion of 288,000 ballots in envelopes in New York State for use in Pennsylvania
– Transport of those ballots from New York to Pennsylvania, several weeks before the Election of 2020, i.e., across state lines.
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/preperation-of-288-000...

Views: 82

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2022   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service